Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Hécaen, Henry (1912–1983)

  • Adam Hudepohl
  • Anthony Y. StringerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_625

Landmark Clinical, Scientific, and Professional Contributions

  • The contemporary identity of neuropsychology was in many ways shaped by the work of Henry Hécaen. While his career was still in its nascent stages, Hécaen moved away from his initial interest in psychiatry, and became increasingly involved in the study of neurology, under the mentorship of Jean Lhermitte. Although the term was not then widely used, Hécaen had been described as a neuropsychologist “from that moment until the end” (Lhermitte et al. 1985). Although the more prestigious routes of the Salpêtrière and Bicêtre were closed to him, due to the rigidity of the French medical establishment (Boller 2006), Hécaen managed to harness the opportunities available to him to become one of the most influential and essential individuals in the establishment of neuropsychology as a distinct discipline.

  • The end of the Second World War and the liberation of France allowed Hécaen to concentrate on the practice of neurology and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Benton, A. (1983). Henry Hécaen (1912–1983). Cortex, 19(4), 425–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, A. (1991). The Hécaen-Zangwill legacy: Hemispheric dominance examined. Neuropsychology Review, 2(4), 267–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benton, A. (1994). Four neuropsychologists. Neuropsychology Review, 4(1), 31–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Boller, F. (2006). Modern neuropsychology in France: Henry Hécaen (1912–1983) and the Sainte-Anne hospital. Cortex, 42(8), 1061–1063.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. de Ajuriaguerra, J., & Hécaen, H. (1949). Le cortex cerebral. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
  6. Galtier, A. (1984). Publications of Henry Hécaen. Neuropsychologia, 22(6), 647–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hécaen, H., Penfield, W., Bertrand, C., & Malmo, R. (1956). The syndrome of apractognosia due to lesions of the minor cerebral hemisphere. AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 75(4), 400–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lhermitte, F., Lecours, A., Poncet, M., Marcie, P., & Whitaker, H. (1985). Memoriam: Henry Hécaen (1912–1983). Brain and Cognition, 4(2), 133–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tzavaras, A. (1986). The evolution of Henry Hécaen’s thoughts: Neuropsychiatry and the theoretical substratum of a neuropsychologist. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2(1), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tzavaras, A., & Albert, M. (2002). Henry Hécaen: Evolution of his thought. In A. Stringer, E. Cooley, & A. Christensen (Eds.), Pathways to prominence in neuropsychology: Reflections of twentieth-century pioneers (pp. 41–47). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Zangwill, O. (1984). Henry Hécaen and the origins of the International Neuropsychological Symposium. Neuropsychologia, 22(6), 813–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA