Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Gage, Phineas (1823–1860)

  • Michelle Ann ProsjeEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_615

Landmark Clinical, Scientific, and Professional Contributions

  • Phineas P. Gage is undoubtedly one of the most renowned patients to have survived severe brain damage (Macmillan 2000). Gage holds a prominent place at the cornerstone of neurological history and is “a fixture in neurological textbooks” (Larner and Leach 2002). Macmillan (2000, 2002) further described Gage as the first reported case to elucidate the relationship between frontal lobe function and personality. Debate regarding the extent of damage caused by Gage’s penetrating injury has ensued due in part to the dearth and unreliability of evidence available from the time of injury and gleaned from postmortem studies. Although there is a lack of consensus in the field, various researchers have theorized about the location and extent of Gage’s brain damage.

  • To gain an appreciation for Gage’s prominence in the early days of neurology, a review of the details surrounding the horrific accident and subsequent sequelae is warranted....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Barker, F. G. (1995). Phineas among the phrenologists: The American crowbar case and nineteenth century theories of cerebral localization. Journal of Neurosurgery, 82, 672–682.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bigelow, H. J. (1850). Dr. Harlow’s case of recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 19, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cobb, S. (1940). Review of neuropsychiatry for 1940. Archives of Internal Medicine, 66, 1341–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb, S. (1943). Borderlands of psychiatry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., & Damasio, A. R. (1994). The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science, 264, 1102–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrier, D. (1878). The Goulstonian lectures on the localization of cerebral diseases. British Medical Journal, 1, 443–447.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harlow, J. M. (1848). Passage of an iron rod through the head. Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 39, 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harlow, J. M. (1868). Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society, 2, 327–347.Google Scholar
  10. Larner, A. J., & Leach, J. P. (2002). Phineas Gage and the beginnings of neuropsychology. Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, 2(3), 26.Google Scholar
  11. Macmillan, M. (1986). A wonderful journey through skull and brains: The travels of Mr. Gage’s tamping iron. Brain and Cognition, 5, 67–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Macmillan, M. (2000). Restoring Phineas Gage: A 150th retrospective. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 9(1), 42–62.Google Scholar
  13. Macmillan, M. (2002). An odd kind of fame: Stories of Phineas Gage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Macmillan, M. (2008). Phineas Gage-unravelling the myth. Psychologist, 21(9), 828–831.Google Scholar
  15. Neylan, T. C. (1999). Frontal lobe function: Mr. Phineas Gage’s famous injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 11(2), 280–283.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Tyler, K. L., & Tyler, H. R. (1982). A “Yankee Invasion”: The celebrated American crowbar case. Neurology, 32, A191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wagar, B. M., & Thagard, P. (2004). Spiking Phineas Gage: A neurocomputational theory of cognitive-affective integration in decision making. Psychological Review, 111(1), 67–79.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NeuroBehavioral Specialists of Jacksonville, Inc.JacksonvilleUSA