Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Melodic Intonation Therapy

  • Lyn S. TurkstraEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_2224

Definition

Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) is a method for the rehabilitation of persons with nonfluent aphasia who present with severely restricted verbal output. MIT emphasizes the use of rhythm and prosody to elicit verbal output. Stimulus items are high-probability words, phrases, and sentences that are functional and meaningful to the person.

Historical Background

For over 200 years, it has been known that most patients with severe aphasia are capable of singing more fluently than they speak. This idea inspired aphasiologists to use rhythm and music to stimulate language production. Instead of singing popular songs, clinicians recommended using functional words and sentences attached to rhythmic patterns. Formal studies of this approach to aphasia therapy completed in the 1970s (Albert et al. 1973) led to the development of the MIT Technique (Helm-Estabrooks et al. 1989).

Rationale or Underlying Theory

Researchers have hypothesized that language and musical functions associated...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Albert, M. L., Sparks, R. W., & Helm, N. A. (1973). Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 29(2), 130–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Janabi, S., Nickels, L. A., Sowman, P. F., Burianova, H., Merrett, D. L., & Thompson, W. F. (2014). Augmenting melodic intonation therapy with non-invasive brain stimulation to treat impaired left-hemisphere function: two case studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bader, E., & Goldfarb, R. (1979). Espousing melodic intonation therapy in aphasia rehabilitations: A case study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 2(3), 333–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, F. A. (2000). Modifying the melodic intonation therapy program for adults with severe non-fluent aphasia. Music Therapy Perspectives, 18(2), 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belin, P., et al. (1996). Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: A PET study. Neurology, 47(6), 1504–1511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonakdarpour, B., Ashayeri, H., & Eftekjarzadeh, A. (2003). Melodic intonation therapy in Persian aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 17(1), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Naeser, M. A. (1985). CT scan lesion localization and response to melodic intonation therapy with nonfluent aphasia cases. Cortex, 21(2), 203–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Helm-Estabrooks, N., Nicholas, M., & Morgan, A. (1989). Melodic intonation therapy manual. San Antonio: Special Press.Google Scholar
  9. Laughlin, S. A., Naeser, M. A., & Gordon, W. P. (1979). Effects of three syllable durations during the melodic intonation therapy technique. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22(2), 311–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlaug, G., Marchina, S., & Norton, A. (2008). From singing to speaking: Why singing may lead to recovery of expressive language function in patients with Broca’s aphasia. Music Perception, 25(4), 315–323.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Sparks, R. (2001). Chap. 31. Melodic intonation therapy. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 703–717). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  12. Van Der Meulen, I., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M., Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H., Visch-Brink, E. G., & Ribbers, G. M. (2014). The efficacy and timing of melodic intonation therapy in subacute aphasia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28(6), 536–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Der Meulen, I., Van De Sandt-Koenderman, M. W., Heijenbrok, M. H., Visch-Brink, E., & Ribbers, G. M. (2016). Melodic intonation therapy in chronic aphasia: Evidence from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 533.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilson, S. J., Parsons, K., & Reutens, D. C. (2006). Preserved singing in aphasia: A case study of the efficacy of melodic intonation therapy. Music Perception, 24(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zumbansen, A., Peretz, I., & Hebert, S. (2014a). Melodic intonation therapy: Back to basics for future research. Frontiers in Neurology, 5, 7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Zumbansen, A., Peretz, I., & Hebert, S. (2014b). The combination of rhythm and pitch can account for the beneficial effect of melodic intonation therapy on connected speech improvements in Broca’s aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 592.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Rehabilitation ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada