Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Direct Assessment of Functional Status

  • Kelli Williams GaryEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1932




The DAFS is a standardized observation-based checklist designed to assess functional capabilities of adults with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and schizophrenia. It can be used for evaluation and reevaluation to assess any decline and effect on function of pharmacological intervention. Intended for use in outpatient settings, the DAFS requires approximately 30–35 min to administer. The examiner needs the evaluation form, pen or pencil, and ADL materials for testing. Simulated daily tasks are observed in the seven following areas: time orientation (score range 0–8), communication (score range 0–9), transportation (score range 0–13), finance (score range 0–7), shopping (score range 0–6), grooming (score range 0–13), and eating (score range 0–10; Loewenstein et al. 1989). Possible total composite scores range from 0 to 106, with higher scores indicating better functioning.

Current Knowledge

In 1989, a new scale for assessment of functional status for patients...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Barrett, J. J., Hart, K. J., Schmerler, J. T., Willmarth, K., Carey, J. A., & Mohammed, S. (2009). Criterion validity of the financial skills subscale of the direct assessment of functional status scale. Psychiatry Research, 166(2–3), 148–157.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Klapow, J. C., Evans, J., Patterson, T. L., Heaton, R. K., Koch, W. L., & Jeste, D. V. (1997). Direct assessment of functional status in older patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(7), 1022–1024.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Loewenstein, D. A., Amigo, E., Duara, R., et al. (1989). A new scale for the assessment of functional status in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. Journal of Gerontology, 44(4), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McDougall, G. J., Becker, H., Vaughan, P. W., Acee, T. W., & Delville, C. L. (2010). The revised direct assessment of functional status for independent older adults. The Gerontologist, 50, 363–370.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Pereira, F. S., Yassuda, M. S., Oliveira, A. M., & Forlenza, O. V. (2008). Executive dysfunction correlates with impaired functional status in older adults with varying degrees of cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 20(6), 1104–1115.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Zanetti, O., Frisoni, G. B., Rozzini, L., Bianchetti, A., & Trabucchi, M. (1998). Validity of direct assessment of functional status as a tool for measuring Alzheimer’s disease severity. Age and Ageing, 27, 615–622.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational TherapyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA