Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Rivermead Mobility Index

  • Gavin WilliamsEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1830




The Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) is a hierarchical mobility scale used in neurological rehabilitation. It includes 15 items related to bed mobility, transfers, walking, stair use, and running. The RMI is presented in a questionnaire format with the examiner required to make one observation (standing unsupported >10 s). All items are rated in a yes/no format with positive responses scoring a 1 for a maximal RMI score of 15.

The RMI is a unidimensional mobility scale, meaning that it has minimal cognitive demands, that is, subjects are not required to interpret, remember, or understand complex or multiple instructions. The more challenging RMI items are more difficult because they require greater physical abilities, while cognitive and social capacity has little impact on performance. Since the RMI is unidimensional, it does not measure the community mobility or the community integration aspect of mobility.

The hierarchical nature of the RMI means that the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Antonucci, G., Aprile, T., & Paolucci, S. (2002). Rasch analysis of the Rivermead mobility index: A study using mobility measures of first stroke inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1442–1449.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashford, S., Brown, S., & Turner-Stokes, L. (2015). Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) for functional performance in the lower limb. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(1), 9–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., & Bradshaw, C. M. (1991). The Rivermead mobility index: A further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. International Disability Studies, 13, 50–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lennon, S., & Johnson, L. (2000). The modified Rivermead mobility index: Validity and reliability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 833–839.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lincoln, N., & Leadbitter, D. (1979). Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 65, 48–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Roorda, L. D., Green, J. R., Houwink, A., Bagley, P. J., Smith, J., Molenaar, I. W., & Geurts, A. C. (2012). Item hierarchy–based analysis of the Rivermead mobility index resulted in improved interpretation and enabled faster scoring in patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(6), 1091–1096.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Rossier, P., & Wade, D. T. (2001). Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scrivener, K., Sherrington, C., & Schurr, K. (2013). A systematic review of the responsiveness of lower limb physical performance measures in inpatient care after stroke. BMC Neurology, 13(1), 4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shum, S.-T., Chiu, J. K.-W., Tsang, C. P.-L., Wong, C. H.-P., Tsang, R. C.-C., Ma, S.-L., Ho, Y. L., & Tsang, P. (2014). Predicting walking function of patients one month Poststroke using modified Rivermead mobility index on admission. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 23(8), 2117–2121.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Sommerfeld, D. K., Johansson, H., Jonsson, A. L., Murray, V., Wessari, T., Holmqvist, L. W., & von Arbin, M. (2011). Rivermead mobility index can be used to predict length of stay for elderly persons, 5 days after stroke onset. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy (2001), 34(2), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsang, et al. (2014). The measurement properties of modified Rivermead mobility index and modified functional ambulation classification as outcome measures for Chinese stroke patients. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 30(5), 353–359.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams, G., Greenwood, K., Robertson, V., Goldie, P., & Morris, M. E. (2006). The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT) for measuring the mobility limitations of people with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 437–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Epworth Rehabilitation Centre Epworth HospitalRichmond MelbourneAustralia