Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Expanded Disability Status Scale

  • Tamara BushnikEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1805

Synonyms

EDSS; Kurtzke expanded disability status scale

Description

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is based upon the original Kurtzke Disability Status Scale (DSS) and Functional Systems (FS) (Kurtzke 1961). There are eight FSs: pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, visual, bowel and bladder, cerebral or mental, and other. Following neurological examination, each FS is rated on a scale of 0-5 (cerebellar and brainstem), 0-1 (other), and 0-6 (all others). These ratings assist in assigning an EDSS score which ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 increments, where 0 indicates a normal neurological examination (but cerebral grade 1 allowed) and 10 corresponds to death due to multiple sclerosis (MS) (see Kurtzke 1983for a full description of the rating scale). In general, EDSS scores ranging from 1.0 to 4.5 quantify the disability/impairment experienced by individuals with MS who are ambulatory, while EDSS scores from 5.0 to 9.5 correspond to disability/impairment of individuals...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Amato, M. P., & Ponziani, G. (1999). Quantification of impairment in MS: Discussion of the scales in use. Multiple Sclerosis, 5(4), 216–219.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Beebe, G. W., Kurtzke, J. F., Kurland, L. T., Auth, T. L., & Nagler, B. (1967). Studies on the natural history of multiple sclerosis. 3. Epidemiologic analysis of the Army experience in World War II. Neurology, 17, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bin Sawad, A., Seoane-Vazquez, E., Rodriguez-Monguio, R., & Turkistani, F. (2016). Evaluation of the expanded disability status scale and the multiple sclerosis functional composite as clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: Quantitative meta-analyses. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 32, 1969–1974.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hobart, J. C., Lamping, D. L., Freeman, J. A., & Thompson, A. J. (1996). Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. European Journal of Neurology, 3(Suppl 4), 13.Google Scholar
  5. Hobart, J., Freeman, J., & Thompson, A. (2000). Kurske scales revisited: The application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition. Brain, 123, 1027–1040.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kurtzke, J. F. (1961). On the evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology, 11, 686–694.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33, 1444–1452.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nagler, B., Beebe, G. W., Kurtzke, J. F., Kurland, L. T., Auth, T. L., & Nefzger, M. D. (1966). Studies on the natural history of multiple sclerosis. 1. Design and diagnosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 42(Suppl 19), 141–156.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharrack, B., Hughes, R. A. C., Soudain, S., & Dunn, G. (1999). The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. Brain, 122, 141–159.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Weinshecker, B. G., Bass, B., Rice, G. P., Noseworthy, J., Carriere, W., Baskerville, J., & Ebers, G. C. (1989). The natural history of multiple sclerosis: A geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain, 112, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inter-Hospital Research and Knowledge TranslationRusk RehabilitationNew YorkUSA