Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Disability Assessment for Dementia

  • Jessica FishEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1800

Synonyms

DAD

Description

The disability assessment for dementia (DAD) is an informant-rated questionnaire or structured interview consisting of 40 items regarding the subject’s involvement in activities of daily living (ADLs). Seventeen items address basic ADLs (hygiene, dressing, continence, and eating), and 23 items relate to Instrumental ADLs (meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, and leisure and housework). Items can be categorized as part of initiation, planning and organization, and effective performance subscales, though a total score is used most frequently. Non-applicable items (e.g., those that a patient did not participate in even before the onset of their illness) are excluded from scoring, with the final scores being converted to a percentage. Scores thus have a potential range from 0% to 100%, with higher percentage scores representing greater competence in ADLs. The assessment is designed to be conducted by a trained...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Bahia, V. S., Carthery-Goulart, M. T., Novelli, M. M., Kato-Narita, E. M., Areza-Fegyveres, R., Caramelli, P., & Nitrini, R. (2010). Functional disability in Alzheimer disease: A validation study of the Brazilian version of the disability assessment for dementia (DAD-Br). Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 24, 291–295.Google Scholar
  2. De Vreese, L. P., Caffarra, P., Savarè, R., Cerutti, R., Franceschi, M., Grossi, E., & Multicentre Study Group. (2008). Functional disability in early Alzheimer’s disease – A validation study of the Italian version of the disability assessment for dementia scale. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 25(2), 186–194.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Feldman, H., Sauter, A., Donald, A., Gélinas, I., Gauthier, S., Torfs, K., et al. (2001). The disability assessment for dementia scale: A 12-month study of functional ability in mild to moderate severity Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer’s Disease and Associated Disorders, 15(2), 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gélinas, I., Gauthier, L., McIntyre, M., & Gauthier, S. (1999). Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: The disability assessment for dementia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 471–481.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kipps, C. M., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J. R. (2009). Emotion, social functioning and activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase, 15, 182–189.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mioshi, E., Kipps, C. M., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Graham, A., & Hodges, J. R. (2007). Activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 68, 2077–2084.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Mok, C. C., Siu, A. M., Chan, W. C., Yeung, K. M., Pan, P. C., & Li, S. W. (2005). Functional disabilities profile of Chinese elderly people with Alzheimer’s disease – A validation study on the Chinese version of the disability assessment for dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 20, 112–119.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Olin, J., & Schneider, L. (2002). Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD001747.Google Scholar
  9. Sanchez-Perez, A., Lopez-Roig, S., Perez, A. P., Gomez, P. P., Pastor, M. A., & Pomares, M. H. (2015). Validation study of the Spanish version of the disability assessment for dementia scale. Medicine, 94, e1925.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sikkes, S. A. M., de Lange-de Klerk, E. S. M., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Scheltens, P., & Uitdehaag, B. M. J. (2009). A systematic review of instrumental activities of daily living scales in dementia: Room for improvement. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 80, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tozlu, M., Cankurtaran, M., Yavuz, B. B., Cankurtaran, E. S., Kutluer, I., Erkek, B. M., Halil, M., Ulger, Z., Cosgun, E., & Ariogul, S. (2014). Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 27, 237–246.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences UnitCambridgeUK