MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools
MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR); MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment (MacCAT-T); MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA); MacArthur competence assessment tool-fitness to plead (MacCAT-FP); MacArthur Judgment Evaluation (MacJEN)
The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT) consist of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR), and the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA). Each of these tools measures a different form of decisional capacity; separate instruments have been developed based on the premise that the capacity to make decisions is situation-specific. All three instruments are commercially available through Professional Resource Press (www.prpress.com). The MacArthur Judgment Evaluation (MacJEN) and MacArthur competence assessment...
References and Readings
- American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging – American Psychological Association. (2008). Assessment of older adults with diminished capacity: A handbook for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (2001). MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR). Sarasota: Professional Resource.Google Scholar
- Demakis, G. J. (2012). Civil capacities in clinical neuropsychology: Research findings and practical applications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
- Grisso, T. (2005). Evaluating juveniles adjudicative competence: A guide for clinical practice. Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.Google Scholar
- Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998a). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998b). MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment (MacCAT-T). Sarasota: Professional Resource.Google Scholar
- Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Broersma, A., de Vries, M. C., Daams, J. G., & Lindauer, R. J. L. (2015). Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children’s decision-making competence? BMC Medical Ethics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-16-1.
- Larrabee, G. J. (2011). Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Marcopulos, B., Morgan, J., & Denney, R. L. (2008). Neuropsychological evaluation of competency to proceed. In R. L. Denney & J. P. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting (pp. 176–203). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Poythress, N., Nicholson, R., Otto, R., Eden, J., Bonnie, R., Monahan, J., et al. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool – Criminal adjudication: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial – Revised professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar