Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Tachistoscopic Presentation

  • Stephen CorreiaEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1405




A tachistoscope (tə-′kis-tə-,skōp; Greek tachistos, very rapid, and skopein, to view) is a device that presents visual stimuli for a precisely controlled period of time, typically milliseconds. This device provides a fixation point for the subject to focus his or her gaze on. That fixation point is then very briefly (e.g., milliseconds) supplanted by an image chosen by the experimenter. The presentation of the image may be followed by the presentation of a visual mask, followed by the reappearance of the fixation point, and then the next stimulus and so on. Presentation is usually projected, but computer monitors have been used. Projection methods usually involve some form of slide projector with an aperture-timing device such as a camera shutter. Alternatively, timing of stimulus presentation can be computer controlled. Compared to computer monitor methods, projection display methods have the capability of presenting large or life-sized images.


This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Benschop, R. (1998). What is a tachistoscope? Historical explorations of an instrument. Science in Context, 11(1), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, J. F., Colosimo, A., Ellis, J. K., Mangine, R., Bixenmann, B., Hasselfeld, K., Graman, P., Elgendy, H., Myer, G., & Divine, J. (2015). Vision training methods for sports concussion mitigation and management. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 99, e52648.Google Scholar
  3. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(8), 653–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Godnig, E. C. (2003). The tachistoscope: Its history and uses. Journal of Behavioral Optometry, 14(2), 39–42.Google Scholar
  5. Marks-Beale, A., Institute, T. P. L. (2001). Getting up to speed. In 10 days to faster reading (pp. 58–79). New York: The Philip Lief Group (Warner).Google Scholar
  6. Reichow, A. W., & Garchow, K. E. (2011). Do scores on a tachistoscope test correlate with baseball batting averages? Eye & Contact Lens, 37(3), 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith, H. P., & Tate, T. R. (1953). Improvements in reading rate and comprehension of subjects training with the tachistoscope. Journal of Educational Psychology, 44(3), 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sperry, R. W. (1968). Hemisphere deconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist, 23(10), 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Thurgood, C., Whitfield, T. W., & Patterson, J. (2001). Towards a visual recognition threshold: New instrument shows humans identify animals with only 1ms of visual exposure. Vision Research, 51(7), 1966–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Human BehaviorAlpert Medical School, Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA