Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Bicycle Drawing Test

  • Ronald A. CohenEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1345

Definition

As the name suggests, the bicycle drawing test requires patients to draw a picture of a bicycle in freehand using a pencil. It can be a useful measure of visual-spatial and visual-motor impairments and also has been used in the assessment of hemi-neglect syndromes. Typically, the patient is asked to draw a copy of a simple line drawn picture of a bicycle. Many clinicians first ask the patient to draw a bicycle in freehand from their own memory, to assess their constructional ability in the absence of a model.

History and Clinical Evidence

The bicycle drawing test is widely associated with Piaget’s (1955) investigations of cognitive development, though similar tests seem to have been employed earlier (Poppelreuter 1990; Veiders 1934). Neuropsychological investigations of focal unilateral lesions (Hecaen and Assal 1970) have demonstrated differences in performance between patients with left- and right-sided posterior brain lesions. Such comparisons have also suggested...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Angenent, H. L. (1971). The development of thought structure among normal and mentally retarded children. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 26(4), 215–232.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Greenberg, G. D., Rodriguez, N. M., & Sesta, J. J. (1994). Revised scoring, reliability, and validity investigations of Piaget’s bicycle drawing test. Assessment, 1(1), 89–101.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Hecaen, H., & Assal, G. (1970). A comparison of constructive deficits following right and left hemispheric lesions. Neuropsychologia, 8(3), 289–303.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Piaget, J. (1955). Perceptual and cognitive (or operational) structures in the development of the concept of space in the child. Acta Psychologica, 11, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Poppelreuter, W. (1990). Disturbances of lower and higher visual capacities caused by occipital damage: With special reference to the psychopathological, pedagogical, industrial, and social implications. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sandyk, R. (1994). Reversal of a visuoconstructional deficit in Parkinson’s disease by application of external magnetic fields: A report of five cases. International Journal of Neuroscience, 75(3–4), 213–228.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Sandyk, R. (1997a). Progressive cognitive improvement in multiple sclerosis from treatment with electromagnetic fields. International Journal of Neuroscience, 89(1–2), 39–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Sandyk, R. (1997b). Reversal of a visuoconstructional disorder by weak electromagnetic fields in a child with Tourette’s syndrome. International Journal of Neuroscience, 90(3–4), 159–167.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sandyk, R. (1998). Reversal of the bicycle drawing direction in Parkinson’s disease by AC pulsed electromagnetic fields. International Journal of Neuroscience, 95(3–4), 255–269.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Sharma, T. R. (1972). Measuring intelligence through bicycle drawings. Indian Educational Review, 7(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  11. van Sommers, P. (1995). Observational, experimental and neuropsychological studies of drawing. In C. Lange-Küttner & G. V. Thomas (Eds.), Drawing and looking: Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 44–61). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  12. Veiders, E. (1934). Analyse der Fähigkeit zum räumlichen Denken. Analysis of the ability for spatial thinking. Psychotechnisches Zeitschrift, 9, 52–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health ProfessionsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Center for Cognitive Aging and MemoryMcKnight Brain Institute, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA