Skip to main content

Capacity Limitations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 11 Accesses

Definition

The constraints on processing of internal and external stimuli that are dependent upon the structure of, and the processes related to, the cognitive system.

Historical Background

Fundamental research in attention emerged in the 1950s with information processing theories. D.E. Broadbent published an influential book in 1958, Perception and Communication, which was in turn influenced by the contemporary work of communication theorists in engineering. Broadbent used the communication system as a metaphor for relationships within the human brain. Each brain system (i.e., sensory, memory, response generation) was conceptualized in terms of a communication system, with an information source, transmission channel(s), and a receiver. The channel by which a message is transmitted has a capacity, which limits the rate by which information can be transmitted. A property of communication systems is that the transmission of information within a system can never exceed the capacity of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1993). The neuropsychology of attention. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovden, M., Backman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 659–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schnieder, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 2. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna MacKay-Brandt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

MacKay-Brandt, A. (2018). Capacity Limitations. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1275

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics