Skip to main content

Testifying Expert Versus Fact Witness

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 160 Accesses

Synonyms

Expert witness; Opinion witness

Definition

An expert witness testifies because he or she has knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education and has expertise that may be meaningful to a party in attempting to prove its side of the case. The expert is not called to testify because of prior involvement in activities that precipitated the litigation. An expert witness testifies voluntarily by agreement with one of the parties or the court. Unlike a fact witness, an expert is entitled to compensation for participation in the case. A key distinction between a fact witness and an expert witness is that an expert witness may provide an opinion. Fact witnesses must limit their testimony to facts in regard to evidence they may have observed or been involved. They may only provide an opinion when the opinion is either based on an actual perception of the witness or might otherwise be helpful to an understanding of their testimony.

Cross-References

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Reading

  • Brodsky, S. L., & Poythress, N. G. (1985). Expertise on the witness stand: A practitioner’s guide. In C. P. Ewing (Ed.), Psychology, psychiatry and the Law: A clinical and forensic handbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L. (1984). Psychological evaluation and expert testimony. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie DeFabrique .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

DeFabrique, N. (2018). Testifying Expert Versus Fact Witness. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1030

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics