Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

Living Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1518-2

Definition

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is a set of procedures and processes by which an individual’s communication skills can be maximized for functional and effective communication. AAC approaches supplement or replace natural speech with aided options that incorporate the use of some type of device ranging from simple picture communication systems to complex speech generating devices and/or unaided options that involve only the individual’s body, such as sign language. AAC may be used to augment understanding as well as written or oral expression. A “multimodal” approach that includes both devices and unaided strategies may be most effective in meeting the individual’s communication needs.

Historical Background

Prior to about 1970, AAC was not a widely accepted intervention technique and could even be described as contraindicated in the professional literature. At that time, it was thought that the act of vocal production was a critical building block of human...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. AAC-RERC. (2011). Mobile devices and communication apps: An RERC white paper. Downloaded from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46
  2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Preferred practice patterns for the profession of speech-language pathology [Preferred Practice Patterns]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
  3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Augmentative and alternative communication decisions. Downloaded 2. 23. 2018.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children& adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Beukleman, D., Garrett, K., & Yorkston, K. (2007). Augmentative and alternative communication strategies for adults with acute or chronic medical conditions. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Mineo, B., Ogletree, B. T., Paul, D., Romski, M., Sevcik, R., Siegel, E., Schoonover, J., Snell, M., Sylvester, L., & Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brumberg, J. S., Pitt, K. M., Mantie-Kozlowski, A., & Burnison, J. D. (2018). Brain–computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication: A tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2015). National coverage determination of speech generating devices. Available from https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/medicare-coverage-document-details.aspx?MCDId=26&mcdtypename=National+Benefit+Category+Analyses&MCDIndexType=3&bc=AgAEAAAAAAAAAA%3d%3d&#finalGoogle Scholar
  10. Fourcin, A. J. (1975). Language development in the absence of expressive speech. In E. H. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Foundations of language development (Vol. II). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Fried-Oken, M., & Bersani, H. (2000). Speaking up and spelling it out: Personal essays on augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Glennen, S. L., & DeCoste, D. C. (1997). Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, K., Kovacs, T., & Shin, S. (2015). Critical issues using brain-computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(3), S8–S15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1990). A comparison of intelligibility among the natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons With Severe Disabilities. (1992). Guidelines for meeting the communication needs of persons with severe disabilities [Guidelines]. Available from www.asha.org/policy or www.asha.org/njc.
  16. Schlosser, R. W. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shane, H., & Bashir, A. S. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Preliminary considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Silverman, F. (1980). Communication for the speechless. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Vanderheiden, G. C. (1978). Non-vocal communication resource book. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  21. Vanderheiden, G. C., & Grilley, K. (1976). Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  22. Vaughn, B., & Horner, R. (1995). Effects of concrete versus verbal choice systems on problem behavior. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Venkatagiri, H. S. (1993). Efficiency of lexical prediction as a communication acceleration technique. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: A historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association of Assistive Technology Act ProgramsSpringfieldUSA