Advertisement

Illumina HumanMethylation BeadChip for Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling: Advantages and Limitations

  • Kazuhiko NakabayashiEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

HumanMethylation BeadChip is an array platform for highly multiplexed measurement of DNA methylation at individual CpG locus in the human genome based on Illumina’s bead technology. It measures the DNA methylation level of individual CpG site by quantitative genotyping of C/T polymorphisms generated in bisulfite-converted and amplified genomic DNA. The current version, HumanMethylationEPIC, measures the DNA methylation level of >850,000 CpG sites, while the previous versions, HumanMethylation450 (HM450) and HumanMethylation27 (HM27), measured that of >480,000 and >27,000 CpG sites, respectively. HumanMethylation BeadChip requires only 4 days to produce methylome profiles of human samples using 250–500 ng of genomic DNA as a starting material. Because of its time and cost efficiency, high sample output, and overall quantitative accuracy and reproducibility, HM450 has become the most widely used means of large-scale methylation profiling of human samples in recent years. However, it is important to consider potential confounders originating in the technical limitations of HumanMethylation BeadChip such as cross-reactive probes, SNP-affected probes, within-array bias (Infinium I and II bias), and between-array bias (batch effects) especially when subtle methylation differences need to be detected by statistical tests between large numbers of cases and controls. Many integrated analysis packages have been developed by the epigenetics research community as computational solutions for technical and biological confounders associated with HumanMethylation BeadChip data. Considering the substantial increase of the coverage of regulatory regions along with the advantages inherited from HM450, EPIC is expected to maintain its popularity as a platform for epigenome-wide association studies for the foreseeable future.

Keywords

DNA methylation Bisulfite conversion Methylome Infinium assay Array Epigenome-wide association study Genomic imprinting Data normalization Batch effects SNP genotyping 

List of Abbreviations

5-mC

5-methylcytosine

CpG

Cytosine-guanine

ddNTP

Dideoxynucleotide triphosphate

DNP

Dinitrophenol

EWAS

Epigenome-wide association study

NGS

Next-generation sequencing

nt

Nucleotide

SNP

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

UTR

Untranslated region

References

  1. Akulenko R, Merl M, Helms V (2016) BEclear: batch effect detection and adjustment in DNA methylation data. PLoS One 11:e0159921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida D, Skov I, Lund J et al (2016) Jllumina - a comprehensive java-based API for statistical Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 and MethylationEPIC data processing. J Integr Bioinform 13:294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida D, Skov I, Silva A et al (2017) Efficient detection of differentially methylated regions using DiMmeR. Bioinformatics 33:549–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bibikova M, Le J, Barnes B et al (2009) Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium® assay. Epigenomics. 1:177–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C et al (2011) High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 98:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carless MA (2015) Determination of DNA methylation levels using Illumina human methylation BeadChips. In: Chellappan SP (ed) Chromatin protocols, Methods in molecular biology, vol 1288. Springer, New York, pp 143–192Google Scholar
  7. Chen YA, Lemire M, Choufani S et al (2013) Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cotton AM, Price EM, Jones MJ et al (2015) Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation. Hum Mol Genet 24:1528–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Court F, Tayama C, Romanelli V et al (2014) Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment. Genome Res 24:554–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Bizet M et al (2014) A comprehensive overview of Infinium HumanMethylation450 data processing. Brief Bioinform 15:929–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Calonne E et al (2011) Evaluation of the Infinium methylation 450K technology. Epigenomics 3:771–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Mello VD, Pulkkinen L, Lalli M et al (2014) DNA methylation in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Ann Med 46:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick KJ, Nelson CP, Tsaprouni L et al (2014) DNA methylation and body-mass index: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 383:1990–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckhardt F, Lewin J, Cortese R et al (2006) DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat Genet 38:1378–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan JB, Hu SX, Craumer WC et al (2005) BeadArray-based solutions for enabling the promise of pharmacogenomics. BioTechniques 39:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Florath I, Butterbach K, Müller H et al (2014) Cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in DNA methylation with age: an epigenome-wide analysis revealing over 60 novel age-associated CpG sites. Hum Mol Genet 23:1186–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Florath I, Butterbach K, Heiss J et al (2016) Type 2 diabetes and leucocyte DNA methylation: an epigenome-wide association study in over 1,500 older adults. Diabetologia 59:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunderson KL, Kruglyak S, Graige MS et al (2004) Decoding randomly ordered DNA arrays. Genome Res 14:870–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gu J, Stevens M, Xing X et al (2016) Mapping of variable DNA methylation across multiple cell types defines a dynamic regulatory landscape of the human genome. G3 (Bethesda) 6:973–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayatsu H (2008) Discovery of bisulfite-mediated cytosine conversion to uracil, the key reaction for DNA methylation analysis – a personal account. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 84:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaffe AE, Irizarry RA (2014) Accounting for cellular heterogeneity is critical in epigenome-wide association studies. Genome Biol 15:R31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelly TK, De Carvalho DD, Jones PA (2010) Epigenetic modifications as therapeutic targets. Nat Biotechnol 28:1069–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS et al (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12:996–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC et al (2010) Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 11:733–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu J, Siegmund KD (2016) An evaluation of processing methods for HumanMethylation450 BeadChip data. BMC Genomics 17:469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y, Aryee MJ, Padyukov L et al (2013) Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Biotechnol 31:142–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miyata K, Miyata T, Nakabayashi K et al (2015) DNA methylation analysis of human myoblasts during in vitro myogenic differentiation: de novo methylation of promoters of muscle-related genes and its involvement in transcriptional down-regulation. Hum Mol Genet 24:410–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morris TJ, Beck S (2015) Analysis pipelines and packages for Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450k) data. Methods 72:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maksimovic J, Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Speed TP et al (2015) Removing unwanted variation in a differential methylation analysis of Illumina HumanMethylation450 array data. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petersen AK, Zeilinger S, Kastenmüller G et al (2014) Epigenetics meets metabolomics: an epigenome-wide association study with blood serum metabolic traits. Hum Mol Genet 23:534–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ et al (2016) Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol 17:208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Price ME, Cotton AM, Lam LL et al (2013) Additional annotation enhances potential for biologically-relevant analysis of the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. Epigenetics Chromatin 6:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rask-Andersen M, Martinsson D, Ahsan M, et al (2016) Epigenome-wide association study reveals differential DNA methylation in individuals with a history of myocardial infarction. Hum Mol Genet (Epub ahead of print) PMID: 27634651Google Scholar
  34. Relton CL, Gaunt T, McArdle W, Ho K, Duggirala A, Shihab H, Woodward G, Lyttleton O, Evans DM, Reik W, Paul YL, Ficz G, Ozanne SE, Wipat A, Flanagan K, Lister A, Heijmans BT, Ring SM, Davey SG (2015) Data resource profile: accessible resource for integrated Epigenomic studies (ARIES). Int J Epidemiol 44:1181–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun Z, Chai HS, Wu Y et al (2011) Batch effect correction for genome-wide methylation data with Illumina Infinium platform. BMC Med Genet 4:84Google Scholar
  36. Shoemaker R, Deng J, Wang W, Zhang K (2010) Allele-specific methylation is prevalent and is contributed by CpG-SNPs in the human genome. Genome Res 20:883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stirzaker C, Taberlay PC, Statham AL, Clark SJ (2014) Mining cancer methylomes: prospects and challenges. Trends Genet 30:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Triche TJ Jr, Weisenberger DJ, Van Den Berg D et al (2013) Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Teschendorff AE, Marabita F, Lechner M et al (2013) A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 29:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wen KX, Miliç J, El-Khodor B et al (2016) The role of DNA methylation and histone modifications in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review. PLoS One 11:e0167201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yousefi P, Huen K, Aguilar Schall R et al (2013) Considerations for normalization of DNA methylation data by Illumina 450K BeadChip assay in population studies. Epigenetics 8:1141–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Z, Zhang R (2015) Epigenetics in autoimmune diseases: pathogenesis and prospects for therapy. Autoimmun Rev 14:854–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou W, Laird PW, Shen H (2017) Comprehensive characterization, annotation and innovative use of Infinium DNA methylation BeadChip probes. Nucleic Acids Res 45:e22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ziller MJ, Gu H, Müller F, Donaghey J, Tsai LT-Y, Kohlbacher O, De Jager PL, Rosen ED, Bennett DA, Bernstein BE, Gnirke A, Meissner A (2013) Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome. Nature 500:477–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Developmental Genomics, Department of Maternal-Fetal BiologyNational Research Institute for Child Health and DevelopmentTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations