Information and Communication Technology Dispositional Factors and Relationship to Information and Communication Technology Practices

  • Anne T. Ottenbreit-LeftwichEmail author
  • Theodore J. Kopcha
  • Peggy A. Ertmer
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


Teacher dispositions reflect multiple internal factors that contribute to a teacher’s decisions/behaviors in any given situation. There have been many studies focused on which dispositional factors lead to teachers’ use of information and communications technology (ICT). Teachers’ integration of ICT has been assessed in a variety of different ways – as a teacher’s intention to use ICT, as the frequency of ICT use in the classroom, and/or as student-centered teaching practices with ICT. If a teacher’s dispositions (i.e., attitudes, perceptions, values) are reflected through his or her behaviors, then we need to ask an important question about ICT practices: What specific dispositions do teachers need to use ICT in their classrooms? This chapter reviewed empirical studies that examined four primary dispositions associated with teachers’ uses of ICT: self-efficacy, attitudes, pedagogical beliefs, and openness to change. This knowledge provides a robust starting point for answering more challenging and complex questions in the near future, such as: Why does a teacher hold certain dispositions, and how can we capitalize on that information to better support teachers in their actual use of ICT?.


ICT Beliefs Knowledge Attitudes Self-efficacy Teacher practices Technology integration 


  1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(1), 91–100. Scholar
  3. Al-Awidi, H. M., & Alghazo, I. M. (2012). The effect of student teaching experience on preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration in the UAE. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 923–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321–347.Google Scholar
  5. Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519–524. Scholar
  6. Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banas, J. R., & York, C. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influence preservice teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integrate technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414. Scholar
  9. Becta. (2004). Primary schools – ICT and standards. An analysis of national data from Ofsted and QCA by Becta.Google Scholar
  10. Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blau, I., & Peled, Y. (2012). Teachers’ openness to change and attitudes towards ICT: Comparison of laptop per teacher and laptop per student programs. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chai, C. S. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean preservice teachers’ ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, R. J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2016). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). Boston, MA: Springer. Retrieved from
  19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeSantis, J. D. (2013). Exploring the effects of professional development for the interactive whiteboard on teachers’ technology self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 343–362. Retrieved from Scholar
  21. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn, K. E., & Rakes, G. C. (2010). Learner-centeredness and teacher efficacy: Predicting teachers’ consequence concerns regarding the use of technology in the classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 57–81.Google Scholar
  24. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., Haymore, J., & Sandholtz, P. D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4–10.Google Scholar
  25. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59, 423–435. Scholar
  30. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teacher beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st century teaching and learning. In H. R. Fives & M. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs. Erlbaum (pp. 403–418). New York: Taylor & Francis-Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Feather, N. T., & Collins, J. M. (1974). Differences in attitudes and values of students in relation to program of study at a college of advanced education. Australian Journal of Education, 18, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flores, I. M. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through field-based science teaching practice with elementary students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, 19.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, L. (2007). An overview of dispositions in teacher education. In Dispositions in teacher education (pp. 3–29). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Hazzan, O. (2003). Prospective high school mathematics teachers’ attitudes toward integrating computers in their future teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 213–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372. Scholar
  37. Howard, S. K., & Gigliotti, A. (2016). Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1351–1366. Scholar
  38. Hsu, P. S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010a). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154. Scholar
  40. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010b). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. Scholar
  41. Karaca, F., Can, G., & Yildirim, S. (2013). A path model for technology integration into elementary school settings in Turkey. Computers & Education, 68, 353–365. Scholar
  42. Kazu, I. Y., & Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016). Toward a broader understanding of teacher technology integration beliefs and values. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 309–335.Google Scholar
  45. Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 321–331). Boston, MA: Springer. Retrieved from
  46. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kopcha, T. J., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kopcha, T. J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Jung, J., & Baser, D. (2014). Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures. Computers & Education, 78, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting affective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263.Google Scholar
  54. Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48(3), 474–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56, 1012–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mathipa, E. R., & Mukhari, S. (2014). Teacher factors influencing the use of ICT in teaching and learning in South African urban schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1213.Google Scholar
  57. McCrory, R. (2006). Technology and teaching: A new kind of knowledge. In E. A. Ashburn & R. E. Floden (Eds.), Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do (pp. 141–160). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  58. McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Minshew, L., & Anderson, J. (2015). Teacher self-efficacy in 1:1 iPad integration in middle school science and math classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 334–367.Google Scholar
  60. Mouza, C. (2009). Does research-based professional development make a difference? A longitudinal investigation of teacher learning in technology integration. Teachers College Record, 111(5), 1195–1241.Google Scholar
  61. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2006). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Retrieved from
  62. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. Scholar
  63. Overbay, A., Patterson, A., Vasu, E., & Grable, L. (2010). Constructivism and technology use: Findings from the impacting leadership project. Educational Media International, 47(2), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. In Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 3–21). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Pan, S. C., & Franklin, T. (2011). In-service teachers’ self-efficacy, professional development, and web 2.0 tools for integration. New Horizons in Education, 59(3), 28–40.Google Scholar
  66. Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the “will, skill, tool” model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359. Scholar
  67. Prestridge, S. J. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prestridge, S. J. (2014). Reflective blogging as part of ICT professional development to support pedagogical change. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rakes, G. C., Fields, V. S., & Cox, K. E. (2006). The influence of teachers’ technology use on instructional practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schulz-Zander, R., Pfeifer, M., & Voss, A. (2008). Observation measures for determining attitudes and competencies toward technology. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 367–379). New York: Springer US. Scholar
  76. Shifflet, R., & Weilbacher, G. (2015). Teacher beliefs and their influence on technology use: A case study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 368–394.Google Scholar
  77. Shiue, Y. M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494–506. Scholar
  80. Tondeur, J., Devos, G., Houtte, M. V., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2009). Understanding structural and cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: The case of ICT integration. Educational Studies, 35(2), 223–235. Scholar
  81. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development.
  82. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Mason: Atomic Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. Turel, V. (2014). Teachers’ computer self-efficacy and their use of educational technology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(4), 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Future ready learning reimagining the role of technology in education. Retrieved from
  85. van Braak, J., van Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407. Scholar
  86. Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271. Scholar
  87. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wasicsko, M. M. (2007). The perceptual approach to teacher dispositions. In Dispositions in teacher education (p. 53). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  89. Welch, F. C., & Pitts, R. E. (2010). Significant issues in defining and assessing teacher dispositions. The Teacher Educator, 45, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wells, J. (2007). Key design factors in durable instructional technology professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 101–122.Google Scholar
  91. Yagci, M. (2016). Effects of pre-service information technologies (IT) teachers’ thinking styles on their use of information and communication technology (ICT). Educational Research and Reviews, 11(2), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yusop, F. D. (2015). A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions to use web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich
    • 1
    Email author
  • Theodore J. Kopcha
    • 2
  • Peggy A. Ertmer
    • 3
  1. 1.Instructional Systems Technology Department, School of EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Learning, Design, and Technology, Department of Career and Information Studies, School of EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  3. 3.Learning Design and Technology, School of EducationPurdue UniversityLittletonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Gerald Knezek
    • 1
  • Rhonda Christensen
    • 2
  1. 1.University of North TexasDentonUSA
  2. 2.University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations