Teaching as a Design Science: Teachers Building, Testing, and Sharing Pedagogic Ideas

Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Approaching teaching as a design science encourages teacher collaboration, to harness the inquiry that goes on every day in classrooms and channel it into shared knowledge that could benefit the whole community of teachers. This chapter explains what teaching as design science is, why leaders of IT should consider it when implementing IT, and how to put it into practice in their leadership of IT.

Keywords

Teaching as a design science Pedagogy Teacher collaboration Learning design Teacher professional development Blended learning Conversational framework Learning designer Pedagogical content knowledge Design science TPD Online learning Learning technology 

References

  1. Agostinho, S. (2006). The use of a visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas. Paper presented at the 23rd annual Ascilite Conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
  2. ALT. (2014). ALT survey on the effective use of learning technology in education. https://www.alt.ac.uk/sites/alt.ac.uk/files/public/ALTsurveyforETAG2014.pdf.
  3. Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T., & Williams, M. (2010). Professional development 2.0: Transforming teacher education pedagogy with 21st century tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(1), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77–85.Google Scholar
  5. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., & Gerlits, B. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, D. L., & Schnellert, L. (2012). Collaborative inquiry in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1206–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, Y.-L., Wu, S.-C., & Wu, H.-H. (2015). They are learning: Changes through teacher professional development of inquiry in curriculum design and implementation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 178–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobozy, E. (2013). Learning design research: Advancing pedagogies in the digital age. Educational Media International, 50(1), 63–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2013.777181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2).Google Scholar
  12. Ertmer, P. A., & O’ttenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrell, G., & Kelly, J. (2006). Collaborative approaches to the management of e-learning (CAMEL). Paper presented at the 12th international conference of the European university information systems organisation. Tartu: University of Tartu.Google Scholar
  14. Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2015). Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 280–299.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodyear, P., & Yang, D. F. (2009). Patterns and pattern languages in educational design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Vol 1 (pp. 167–187). Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. (2009). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge. ICLS’08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences, 1, 374–381.Google Scholar
  18. Kalaš, I., Laval, E., Laurillard, D., Lim, C. P., Meyer, F., Musgrave, S.,…, & Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (Eds.) (2012). ICT in primary education. Analytical study. Volume 1: Exploring the origins, settings and initiatives. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  19. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research on Learning Technology, 24(ISSN 2156-7077).Google Scholar
  21. Laurillard, D., & Masterman, E. (2009). TPD as online collaborative learning for innovation in teaching. In O. Lindberg & A. D. Olofsson (Eds.), Online learning communities and teaching professional development: Methods for improved educational delivery (pp. 230–246). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Laurillard, D., Charlton, P., Craft, B., Dimakopoulos, D., Ljubojevic, D., Magoulas, G.,…, & Whittlestone, K. (2013). A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00458.x.
  23. Lin, F., Lin, S., & Huang, T. (2008). Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community. Computers & Education, 50, 742–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Makri, K., Papanikolaou, K., Tsakiri, A., & Karkanis, S. (2014). Blending the Community of Inquiry Framework with learning by design: Towards a synthesis for blended learning in teacher training. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 12(2), 183–194.Google Scholar
  25. Masterman, E., Walker, S., & Bower, M. (2013). Computational support for teachers’ design thinking: Its feasibility and acceptability to practitioners and institutions. Educational Media International, 50(1), 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matzat, U. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morris, A., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products : An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Najafi, H., & Clarke, A. (2008). Web-supported communities for professional development: Five cautions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 244–263.Google Scholar
  29. OECD. (2016). Innovating education and educating for innovation: The power of digital technologies and skills. Retrieved from Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Rolando, L. G. R., Salvador, D. F., Souza, A. H. S., & Luz, M. R. M. P. (2014). Learning with their peers: Using a virtual learning community to improve an in-service biology teacher education program in Brazil. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 44–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1).  https://doi.org/10.21432/t2859m.
  32. Schlager, M., Farooq, U., Fusco, J., Schank, P., & Dwyer, N. (2009). Analyzing online teacher networks: Cyber networks require cyber research tools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. USDoE. (2014). The future ready district: Professional learning through online communities. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vavasseur, C., & MacGregor, S. (2008). Extending content-focused professional development through online communities of practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang, J. (2009). Toward a creative social web for learners and teachers. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, Y., & Laurillard, D. (2015). Planning and sharing learning designs: cross-cultural use of a learning design support tool. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sara Dexter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations