Application of Nanofibers in Ophthalmic Tissue Engineering

  • Davood Kharaghani
  • Muhammad Qamar Khan
  • Ick Soo KimEmail author
Reference work entry


This chapter describes recently designed and developed nanofiber scaffolds used for ophthalmic tissue engineering applications. In recent decades, ophthalmic diseases have been a significant health concern throughout the world, and the prevalence is likely to increase, especially in developing countries. Many types of research have focused on ophthalmic disease remedies, as well as corneal transplantation, retinal detachment, and preparation of an appropriate system for regeneration of the cornea and retina by use of scaffolds. Therefore, a necessary property for scaffold materials—in addition to biocompatibility, mechanical strength, and permeability to glucose and other nutrients—is the ability to encourage cell adhesion, which could allow artificial scaffolds to be fixed in place. However, the topography of materials has an significant effect on their applications, particularly in ophthalmic tissue engineering. Recently, nanofibers have attracted attention because of their unique properties for preparation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable scaffolds. Electrospinning is a method used to produce biocompatible scaffolds from nanofibers for the purpose of tissue regeneration. Nanofibers can produce three-dimensional scaffolds for various purposes in ophthalmic applications such as corneal transplantation and retinal regeneration.


Nanofibers in ophthalmology Ophthalmic tissue engineering Scaffold nanofibers 


  1. 1.
    Sommer F, Brandl F, Göpferich A (2006) Ocular tissue engineering. In: Fisher JP (ed) Tissue engineering. Springer, New York, pp 413–429Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karamichos D (2015) Ocular tissue engineering: current and future directions. J Funct Biomater 6:77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akter F (2016) Chapter 5—Ophthalmic tissue engineering. In: Tissue engineering made easy. Academic, Cambridge, pp 43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black CRM, Goriainov V, Gibbs D, Kanczler J, Tare RS, Oreffo ROC (2015) Bone tissue engineering. Curr Mol Biol Rep 1:132–140. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmidt CE, Leach JB (2003) Neural tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 5:293–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhardwaj N, Chouhan D, Mandal BB (2018) 3D functional scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. In: Deng Y, Kuiper J (eds) Functional 3D tissue engineering scaffolds. Woodhead, Waltham, pp 345–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martins A, Reis RL, Neves NM (2018) Micro/nano scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. In: Oliveira JM, Pina S, Reis RL, Roman JS (eds) Osteochondral tissue engineering: nanotechnology, scaffolding-related developments and translation. Springer, Cham, pp 125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Myung D, Duhamel PE, Cochran JR, Noolandi J, Ta CN, Frank CW (2008) Development of hydrogel-based keratoprostheses: a materials perspective. Biotechnol Prog 24:735–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang H, Zuo Y, Zhang L, Li J, Zhang A, Li Y, Yang X (2014) Property-based design: optimization and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel and PVA-matrix composite for artificial cornea. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee H, Kharaghani D, Kim IS (2018) Mechanical force for fabricating nanofiber. In: Lin T (ed) Novel aspects of nanofibers. InTechOpen, Rijeka. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chirila TV et al (1998) Artificial cornea. Prog Polym Sci 23:447–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hao J, Li SK, Kao WW, Liu C-Y (2010) Gene delivery to cornea. Brain Res Bull 81:256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milan Eye Center (2016) Cornea center.
  14. 14.
    Pino M, Stingelin N, Tanner K (2008) Nucleation and growth of apatite on NaOH-treated PEEK, HDPE and UHMWPE for artificial cornea materials. Acta Biomater 4:1827–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Legeais J-M, Renard G (1998) A second generation of artificial cornea (Biokpro II). Biomaterials 19:1517–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sharma S, Mohanty S, Gupta D, Jassal M, Agrawal AK, Tandon R (2011) Cellular response of limbal epithelial cells on electrospun poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibrous scaffolds for ocular surface bioengineering: a preliminary in vitro study. Mol Vis 17:2898Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma S, Gupta D, Mohanty S, Jassal M, Agrawal AK, Tandon R (2014) Surface-modified electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold with improved optical transparency and bioactivity for damaged ocular surface reconstruction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azari P, Luan NS, Gan SN, Yahya R, Wong CS, Chua KH, Pingguan-Murphy B (2015) Electrospun biopolyesters as drug screening platforms for corneal keratocytes. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 64:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bakhshandeh H et al (2011) Poly(ɛ-caprolactone) nanofibrous ring surrounding a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel for the development of a biocompatible two-part artificial cornea. Int J Nanomed 6:1509Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson SL, Wimpenny I, Ahearne M, Rauz S, El Haj AJ, Yang Y (2012) Chemical and topographical effects on cell differentiation and matrix elasticity in a corneal stromal layer model. Adv Funct Mater 22:3641–3649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ortega Í, Ryan AJ, Deshpande P, MacNeil S, Claeyssens F (2013) Combined microfabrication and electrospinning to produce 3-D architectures for corneal repair. Acta Biomater 9:5511–5520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu J, Du Y, Watkins SC, Funderburgh JL, Wagner WR (2012) The engineering of organized human corneal tissue through the spatial guidance of corneal stromal stem cells. Biomaterials 33:1343–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Acun A, Hasirci V (2014) Construction of a collagen-based, split-thickness cornea substitute. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 25:1110–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phu D, Wray LS, Warren RV, Haskell RC, Orwin EJ (2010) Effect of substrate composition and alignment on corneal cell phenotype. Tissue Eng A 17:799–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wray LS, Orwin EJ (2009) Recreating the microenvironment of the native cornea for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng A 15:1463–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Biazar E, Baradaran-Rafii A, Heidari-keshel S, Tavakolifard S (2015) Oriented nanofibrous silk as a natural scaffold for ocular epithelial regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 26:1139–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tonsomboon K, Oyen ML (2013) Composite electrospun gelatin fiber–alginate gel scaffolds for mechanically robust tissue engineered cornea. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 21:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baradaran-Rafii A, Biazar E, Heidari-Keshel S (2015) Cellular response of limbal stem cells on PHBV/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for ocular epithelial regeneration. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 64:879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salehi S, Bahners T, Gutmann J, Gao S-L, Mäder E, Fuchsluger T (2014) Characterization of structural, mechanical and nano-mechanical properties of electrospun PGS/PCL fibers. RSC Adv 4:16951–16957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ye J et al (2014) Chitosan-modified, collagen-based biomimetic nanofibrous membranes as selective cell adhering wound dressings in the treatment of chemically burned corneas. J Mater Chem B 2:4226–4236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yan J et al (2012) Effect of fiber alignment in electrospun scaffolds on keratocytes and corneal epithelial cells behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A 100:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang C, Wen J, Yan J, Kao Y, Ni Z, Cui X, Wang H (2015) In situ growth induction of the corneal stroma cells using uniaxially aligned composite fibrous scaffolds. RSC Adv 5:12123–12130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang J, Gao C, Zhang Y, Wan Y (2010) Preparation and in vitro characterization of BC/PVA hydrogel composite for its potential use as artificial cornea biomaterial. Mater Sci Eng C 30:214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kharaghani D, Meskinfam M, Rezaeikanavi M, Balagholi S, Fazili N (2015) Synthesis and characterization of hybrid nanocomposite via biomimetic method as an artificial cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:5024–5024Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu Z, Kong B, Liu R, Sun W, Mi S (2018) Engineering of corneal tissue through an aligned PVA/collagen composite nanofibrous electrospun scaffold. Nanomaterials 8:124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu K, Li Y, Xu F, Zuo Y, Zhang L, Wang H, Liao J (2009) Graphite/poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel composite as porous ringy skirt for artificial cornea. Mater Sci Eng C 29:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hildebrand GD, Fielder AR (2011) Anatomy and physiology of the retina. In: Reynolds JD, Olitsky SE (eds) Pediatric retina. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 39–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Banerjee S (2006) A review of developments in the management of retinal diseases. J R Soc Med 99:125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ramsden CM, Powner MB, Carr A-JF, Smart MJ, da Cruz L, Coffey PJ (2013) Stem cells in retinal regeneration: past, present and future. Development 140:2576–2585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hunt NC, Hallam D, Karimi A, Mellough CB, Chen J, Steel DH, Lako M (2017) 3D culture of human pluripotent stem cells in RGD–alginate hydrogel improves retinal tissue development. Acta Biomater 49:329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oswald J, Baranov P (2018) Regenerative medicine in the retina: from stem cells to cell replacement therapy. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 10:2515841418774433Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Redenti S et al (2008) Retinal tissue engineering using mouse retinal progenitor cells and a novel biodegradable, thin-film poly(e-caprolactone) nanowire scaffold. J Ocul Biol Dis Infor 1:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Komez A, Baran ET, Erdem U, Hasirci N, Hasirci V (2016) Construction of a patterned hydrogel–fibrous mat bilayer structure to mimic choroid and Bruch’s membrane layers of retina. J Biomed Mater Res A 104:2166–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xiang P, Wu KC, Zhu Y, Xiang L, Li C, Chen DL, Chen F, Xu G, Wang A, Li M, Jin ZB (2014) A novel Bruch’s membrane-mimetic electrospun substrate scaffold for human retinal pigment epithelium cells. Biomaterials 35(37):9777–9788CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davood Kharaghani
    • 1
  • Muhammad Qamar Khan
    • 1
  • Ick Soo Kim
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Nano Fusion Technology Research Group, Division of Frontier FibersInstitute for Fiber Engineering (IFES), Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research (ICCER), Shinshu UniversityUeda, NaganoJapan
  2. 2.Nano Fusion Technology Research Group, Division of Frontier FibersInstitute for Fiber Engineering (IFES), Interdisciplinary Cluster for Cutting Edge Research (ICCER), Shinshu UniversityTokidaJapan

Personalised recommendations