Advertisement

Hemorrhoids pp 379-383 | Cite as

Why and When I Do Prefer the Dearterialization of Hemorrhoids and Mucopexy

  • Enrico Merolla
  • Bruno Scotto
  • Micaela Piccoli
Reference work entry
Part of the Coloproctology book series (COLOPROCT, volume 2)

Abstract

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization represents a valid treatment for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Its introduction 20 years ago, followed by many technical adjustments and improvements, brought an important “non-excisional” option to resolve a frequent proctological problem. Starting from the anatomic, physiologic, and physiopathologic knowledges of the hemorrhoidal disease, associated with the evaluation of the encouraging results obtained, many surgeons have been starting to identify this technique as an optimal compromise because of the patient’s satisfaction and the reduction of postoperative pain, associated with acceptable long-term recurrence rate when compared with other “milestones” techniques. An important step to obtain worldwide acceptance has been done when evaluating the efficacy of the technique in selected degrees of hemorrhoids: if at the beginning of the experience the data were obtained regardless of the degree of the disease, then many trials started to select specific patients to obtain more homogenous results to better clarify the efficacy of the technique. The aim of this chapter is to briefly summarize the correct indications for this technique to obtain good outcomes and reduce the failure of the treatment.

References

  1. Arnold S, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Scheyer M (2002) Doppler ultrasound assisted hemorrhoid artery ligation. A new therapy in symptomatic hemorrhoids. Chirurg 73:269–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L (2004) Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Color Dis 19:176–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom P-O, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dal Monte PP, Tagariello C, Giordano P et al (2007) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:333–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A, Mills E, Elahi S (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Color Dis 16:373–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, vol 5. Baillière Tindall, London, pp 98–149Google Scholar
  9. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, THD group of the SICCR (Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery) (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third- degree haemorrhoids. Color Dis 14:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leardi S, Pessia B, Mascio M, Piccione F, Schietroma M, Pietroletti R (2016) Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (DG-THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the treatment of third-degree hemorrhoids: clinical results at short and long-term follow- up. J Gastrointest Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3220-1
  11. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R (1989) The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Color Dis 4:118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 45:826–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 355:810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ratto C (2014) THD Doppler procedure for haemorrhoids: the surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol 18:291–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2010) Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 53:803–811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:191–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D’Agostino E, Pagano C, Cavazzoni E, Brugnano L, Litta F (2015) Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Color Dis 17:910–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Mall H, Arnold S (2006) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am J Surg 191:89–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Weinstein MA (2001) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 182:515–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Trompetto M, Clerico G, Cocorullo GF, Giordano P, Marino F, Martellucci J, Milito G, Mistrangelo M, Ratto C (2015) Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement. Tech Coloproctol 19:567–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zampieri N, Castellani R, Andreoli R, Geccherle R (2012) Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with haemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Am J Surg 204:684–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.General Surgery Emergency Surgery and New TechnologiesOspedale Civile S.Agostino EstenseModenaItaly
  2. 2.General SurgeryAUSL Reggio Emilia - Ospedale Civile di GuastallaGuastallaItaly

Personalised recommendations