Advertisement

Hemorrhoids pp 253-275 | Cite as

Literature Review on Hemorrhoidectomy

  • Guy R. Orangio
Reference work entry
Part of the Coloproctology book series (COLOPROCT, volume 2)

Abstract

The surgical hemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard for the management of symptomatic grade III and grade IV Hemorrhoids. In 1937, Milligan-Morgan described the surgical hemorrhoidectomy, leaving the wounds open, the term open hemorrhoidectomy came to symbolize the excisional hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan et al., Lancet 233:1119–1124, 1937). In 1959 Ferguson et al., described the technique of modifying the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy by closing hemorrhoidectomy wounds, the term closed hemorrhoidectomy came to symbolize the modification of the Milligan-Morgan procedure (Ferguson and Heaton, Dis Colon Rectum 2:176–179, 1959). The “closed” hemorrhoidectomy has become the main technique for hemorrhoidectomy instructed in General Surgery and Colon and Rectal Surgery residencies in the United States. The principal of the surgical hemorrhoidectomy is to completely excise all of the hemorrhoidal tissue, in the three most common quadrants, the right anterior, right posterior and left lateral areas of the anal canal. The most common complaint for patients is postoperative pain, and the disability caused by the pain. This postoperative pain is the driving force in the development or “quest” for the “painless” hemorrhoidectomy. All other procedures are compared to the excisional hemorrhoidectomy, for postoperative pain, disability, bleeding, stricture formation and recurrence. There are multiple modalities that are utilized to diminish post hemorrhoidectomy pain, which I will discuss. There has been development of new technology for “non-excisional” hemorrhoid procedures with the promise to decrease post hemorrhoidectomy pain and disability. The two most commonly used alternatives today is the Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids (PPH) more commonly known as the “Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy” and the other is the Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation, known as Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) with plication of the Hemorrhoids (ligation anopexy or mucopexy) (Yeo and Tan, World J Gastroenterol 20:16,976–16,983, 2014; Lohsiriwat, Tech Coloproctol 12:229–239, 2015).

The standard tools for the surgical hemorrhoidectomy are the scalpel, scissors or electrocautery, however efforts to decrease the amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the associated post-operative pain and disability have led to the development of alternative energy devices to dissect and excise the hemorrhoidal tissue: the LigaSure™, a computer-guided bipolar electrothermy device (BED), and the Harmonic Scalpel™, which is vibratory energy (VE) (Mastakov et al., Tech Coloproctol 2:229–239, 2008; Neinhuijs and de Hingh, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD 006761, 2009; Chung et al., Dis Colon Rectum 45:784–794, 2002; Armstrong et al., Dis Colon Rectum 44:558–564, 2001). This chapter will discuss the literature leading up to the current management of patients with advanced hemorrhoidal disease and the procedures and the methods utilized to minimize postoperative pain and disability.

Abbreviations

AUC

Area under quality of life curve

BED

Bipolar electrothermy device

BPI

Brief Pain Inventory

BSH

Bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy

BT

Botulinum toxin

CBT

Clostridium botulinum toxin

CH/CSH

Conventional surgical hemorrhoidectomy

DEH

Diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy

DFB

DepoFoam bupivacaine

DFH

Diathermy Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

DH

Diathermy hemorrhoidectomy

DPIS

Distal partial internal sphincterotomy

FH

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

GT/GTN

Glyceryl trinitrate ointment

HSH

Harmonic scalpel® hemorrhoidectomy

HSS

Hemorrhoidal symptom scores

LH

LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy

LIS

Lateral internal sphincterotomy

LOS

Length of stay (hospital stay)

MMH/OH

Milligan-Morgan (open) hemorrhoidectomy

MRP

Maximal resting pressures

MSP

Maximal squeeze pressures

N=

Number of participants

NO

Nitrous oxide

NRS

Numeric rating scale

NSAIDS

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NTG

Nitroglycerin

PC

Pedicle coagulation

PES

Pain expectation scores

PJ

Petroleum jelly

PL

Pedicle ligation

PO

Placebo ointment

PPH/SRM/SH

Procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids

PPS

Postoperative pain score

QALY

Quality-adjusted life-years

RBL

Rubber band ligation

RCT

Randomized controlled trial

SCH/Parks

Semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy

THD/HAL

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization

THE

Traditional excisional hemorrhoidectomy

VAS

Visual analogue scale

VE

Vibratory energy

References

  1. Alper D, Ram E, Stein GY, Dreznik Z (2005) Resting anal pressure following hemorrhoidectomy and lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2080–2084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelici A, Ferranti F, Piermattei A et al (1987) Submucosal lateral sphincterotomy associated with hemorrhoidectomy by the Milligan-Morgan method. Clin Study Minerva Chir 42:633–635Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong DN, Ambroze WL, Schertzer ME, Orangio GR (2001) Harmonic scalpel® vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 44(4):558–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessa SS (2011) Diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing pedicle ligation and pedicle coagulation. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1405–1411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilgin Y, Hot S, Barlas IS et al (2015) Short and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy versus stapler hemorrhoidopexy in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Asian J Surg 38:214–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brisinda G, Maria G, Bentivoglio A et al (1993) A comparison of injections of botulinum toxin and topical nitroglycerine ointment for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med 341:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown SR, Tieman JP, Watson AJM et al (2016) Hemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree hemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 388:356–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulus H, Tas A, Coskun A, Kucukazman M (2014) Evaluation of two hemorrhoidectomy techniques: harmonic scalpel® and Ferguson’s with electrocautery. Asian J Surg 37:20–23. www.sciencedirect.comCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari A et al (2008) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (Hemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 12:iii–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ et al (1998) Double-blind randomized controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case hemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 351:169–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung CC, Ha JPY, Tai YP, Tsang WWC, Li MKW (2002) Double-blind, randomized trial comparing harmonic scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision. Dis Colon Rectum 45:789–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies J, Duffy D, Boyt N et al (2003) Botulinum toxin (Botox®) reduces pain after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a double-blind randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:109701102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denoya P, Tam J, Bergamaschi R (2014) Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year follow-up assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 18:1081–1085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmer SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE (2013) A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR (1959) Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2(2):176–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Galizia G, Lieto E, Castellano P et al (2000) Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomized prospective study. Eur J Surg 166:223–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerjy R, Derwinger K, Lindhoff-Larson A et al (2011) Long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy in a prospective single center study of 153 patients with 1–6 years follow-up. Colorectal Dis 14:490–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldstein ET, Williamson PR, Larach SW (1993) Subcutaneous morphine pump for postoperative hemorrhoidectomy pain management. Dis Colon Rectum 36:439–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV (2011) Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1552–1559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta PJ, Heda PS, Kalaskar S, Tamaskar VP (2008) Topical sucralfate decreases pain after hemorrhoidectomy and improves healing: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Junior IF, Kotze PG, Rocha JG et al (2014) Postoperative topical analgesia of hemorrhoidectomy with policresulen and cinchocaine: a prospective and controlled study. Rev Col Bras 41(2):092–098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karanlik H, Akturk R, Camlica H et al (2009) The effect of glyceryl trinitrate ointment on post hemorrhoidectomy pain and wound healing: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:280–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan S, Pawlak BS, Eggengerger JC et al (2001) Prospective, randomized trial comparing closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the harmonic scalpel® technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44(6):845–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan KI, Waqas A, Akmal M et al (2014) Efficacy of combination of 0.2% GTN and lignocaine ointments in wound healing and pain relief after Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy – a comparison with lignocaine and 0.2% GTN ointments separately. Int J Surg 12:329–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Khubchandani I (2002) Internal sphincterotomy with hemorrhoidectomy does not relieve pain. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1452–1457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee KC, Chen HH, Chung KC et al (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes for stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Surg 11:914–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress of endoscopic surgery, Monduzzi Aditre, Bologna, pp 777–784Google Scholar
  28. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90(4):610–613PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicholson TJ, Armstrong DN (2004) Topical metronidazole (10 percent) decreases post-hemorrhoidectomy pain and improves healing. Dis Colon Rectum 47:711–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Parks AG (1956) The surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 43:337–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Patti R, Piero LA, Muggeo VMR et al (2005) Improvement of wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized study of botulinum toxin injection. Dis Colon Rectum 48:217302179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patti R, Luigi AP, Matteo A et al (2006) Botulinum toxin vs. topical glyceryl trinitrate ointment for pain control in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1741–1748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ripetti V, La Vaccara V, Greco S et al (2015) A randomized trial comparing stapled rectal mucosectomy versus open and semi-closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 58:1083–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rittan S, Chadker S (1992) Role of nitric oxide as a mediator of internal anal sphincter relaxation. Am J Phys 262:G 107–G 112Google Scholar
  35. Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Ang HG, Goh HS (1992) Prospective. Randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 51:940–944Google Scholar
  36. Shahram A, Majid S, Fariborz E (2008) Topical metronidazole can reduce pain after surgery and pain on defecation in postoperative hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51(2):235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shao WJ, GCH LI, ZHK Z et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharif I, Lee L, Alexander-Williams J (1991) Diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. Int J Color Dis 6:217–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silverman R, Bendick PJ, Wasvary HJ (2005) A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of a calcium channel blocker ointment on pain after hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1913–1916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan KY, Sim HL (2014) Randomized single-blind clinical trial of intradermal methylene blue on pain reduction after open diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 16:283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wasvary HJ, Hain J, Mosed-Vogel M et al (2001) Randomized prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of effect of nitroglycerin ointment on pain after hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44(8):1069–1073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson AJM, Bruhn H, MacLeod K et al (2014) A pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, controlled, trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy to tradition excisional surgery for hemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:439. www.trialjournal.com/content/15/1/439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson AJM, Hudson J, Wood J et al (2016) Comparison of stapled hemorrhoidopexy with tradition excisional surgery for hemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Lancet 388:2375–2385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu L, Chen H, Lin G, Ge Q (2015) LigaSure™ versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:106–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ et al (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 19(29):4799–4807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryLouisiana State University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations