Complex Intervention Trials
- 314 Downloads
Clinical trial methodology was developed for pharmaceutical drug development and evaluation. In recent years, trials have expanded to an increasingly diverse range of interventions.
The term complex intervention describes treatments that are multicomponent and include clustering due to specific components, such as the healthcare provider, which cannot be separated from the package of treatment and influence treatment outcomes. This chapter provides an overview of the main considerations in the design and analysis of complex interventions trials.
Initial development of complex interventions is a multidisciplinary endeavor and requires rigorous qualitative and quantitative methods. Understanding both the intervention components and how they interact is crucial for successful development and evaluation of the intervention.
Published guidance on methods for feasibility, piloting, or early phase trials of complex interventions is scarce. However, there are well-established methods for phase III trials of multicomponent interventions that involve clustering. The most commonly used methods, including individually randomized trials with random effects for clusters, cluster randomized trials, and stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials, are described. Analysis focuses on generalized linear (mixed) models; methods for sample size estimation that accommodate the extra variance related to clustering are also provided for a range of designs in this setting.
With careful attention to the correlation structure induced by the chosen design, results can be analyzed in standard statistical software, although small numbers of clusters, and/or small within-cluster sizes, can cause convergence problems.
Statistical analysis results of complex interventions trials, including those relating to components of the intervention, need to be considered alongside economic, qualitative, and behavioral research to ensure that complex interventions can be successfully implemented into routine practice.
KeywordsRandomized; Cluster randomized; Clinical trial; Complex intervention; Multicomponent; Clustering; Healthcare provider; Stepped-wedge
- Austin PC (2010) Estimating multilevel logistic regression models when the number of clusters is low: a comparison of different statistical software procedures. Int J Biostat 6Google Scholar
- Cisse MBM, Sangare D, Oxborough RM, Dicko A, Dengela D, Sadou A, Mihigo J, George K, Norris L, Fornadel C (2017) A village level cluster-randomized entomological evaluation of combination long-lasting insecticidal nets containing pyrethroid plus PBO synergist in Southern Mali. Malar J 16:477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C (1981) Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol 114:19Google Scholar
- Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (2015) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 4th edn. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Emery JD, Gray V, Walter FM, Cheetham S, Croager EJ, Slevin T, Saunders C, Threlfall T, Auret K, Nowak AK, Geelhoed E, Bulsara M, Holman CDJ (2017) The Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Trial: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce time to diagnosis in rural cancer patients in Western Australia. Br J Cancer 117:1459–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Erasmus V, Huis A, Oenema A, Van Empelen P, Boog MC, Van Beeck EH, Polinder S, Steyerberg EW, Richardus JH, Vos MC, Van Beeck EF (2011) The ACCOMPLISH study. A cluster randomised trial on the cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to improve hand hygiene compliance and reduce healthcare associated infections. BMC Public Health 11:721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fuller C, Michie S, Savage J, Mcateer J, Besser S, Charlett A, Hayward A, Cookson BD, Cooper BS, Duckworth G, Jeanes A, Roberts J, Teare L, Stone S (2012) The Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT)-improving hand-hygiene compliance in UK healthcare workers: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 7:e41617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, Mcculloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan AW, Michie S (2014) Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 348:g1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mcculloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol C, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, De Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, Mcpherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Medical_Research_Council (2000) A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve healthGoogle Scholar
- Medical_Research_Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidanceGoogle Scholar
- Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, G (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63:e1–e37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pocock SJ (1983) Clinical trials: a practical approach. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Rabe-Hesketh S and Skrondal A (2012) Mulilevel and longitudinal modelling using Stata. Stata Press, TexasGoogle Scholar
- Sharples L, Everett C, Singh J, Mills C, Spyt T, Abu-Omar Y, Fynn S, Thorpe B, Stoneman V, Goddard H, Fox-Rushby J, Nashef S (2018) Amaze: a double-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding an ablation device-based maze procedure as an adjunct to routine cardiac surgery for patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation. Health Technol Assess 22:1–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Surr CA, Walwyn RE, Lilley-Kelly A, Cicero R, Meads D, Ballard C, Burton K, Chenoweth L, Corbett A, Creese B, Downs M, Farrin AJ, Fossey J, Garrod L, Graham EH, Griffiths A, Holloway I, Jones S, Malik B, Siddiqi N, Robinson L, Stokes G, Wallace D (2016) Evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Dementia Care Mapping to enable person-centred care for people with dementia and their carers (DCM-EPIC) in care homes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 17:300CrossRefGoogle Scholar