Advertisement

Re-turning Childhoodnature: A Diffractive Account of the Past Tracings of Childhoodnature as a Series of Theoretical Turns

  • Karen Malone
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Weaving my personal narrative with a cartography of the theoretical field of childhoodnature, this chapter is the account of being a scholar working in the field of environmental education and more recently childhoodnature for close to two decades. To do this disruptive work, I am exploring the use of Barad’s (Parallax 20(3): 168–187, 2014), this notion of a “re-turn” in her diffractive theorizing. Spanning a series of theoretical turns from critical theory, ecophilosophy, human geography, social cultural theory, feminist theory, and more recently posthumanist and new materialist theory, this account is embedded in the interdisciplinary fields of childhood studies, children’s geographies, children’s environments, and environmental/nature education. Littered with the intersection of stories of children growing up in a variety of “places” across the globe, the account seeks to acknowledge and trouble the view that childhoodnature does not exist without a philosophical past by tracing its theoretical ghosts.

Keywords

New materialism Socially critical theory Posthumanism Diffractive theorizing Anthropocene Posthumanist ecological community Intra-acting Enmeshment Assemblages Disrupting Re-turning 

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 120–154). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bookchin, M. (1971). Post-scarcity anarchism. San Francisco, CA: Ramparts.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for the post-exuberant society. The American Behavioural Scientist, 24, 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chawla, L. (2002). Growing up in an urbanising world. London, England: UNESCO, Earthscan.Google Scholar
  9. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms. Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Commoner, B. (1972). The closing circle. London, England: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, England: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Devall, S., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs Smith.Google Scholar
  13. Driskell, D. (2002). Creating better cities with children and youth. London, England: UNESCO, Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fairweather, P. G. (1993). Links between ecology and ecophilosophy, ethics and the requirements of environmental management. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fien, J. (1993). Education for the environment: Critical curriculum theorising and environmental education. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2014). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gans, E., Tsing, A., Swanson, H., & Bubandt, N. (2017). Introduction: Haunted landscapes of eth Anthropocene. In A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Arts of living on a damaged planet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goldsmith, E. (1992). The way: An ecological world-view. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Goldsmith, E. (1972). Blueprint for survival. Houghton Mifflin, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Gough, N. (1992). Blueprints for greening schools. Prahan, Australia: Gould League.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165. http://environmentalhumanities.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials. Manchester, UK: National Centre for Research Methods, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  27. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Malone, K. (1996). Socially critical environmental education: Research as activism (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
  29. Malone, K. (1999). Environmental education researchers as activists. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malone, K. (2011). My island home: Theorising childhood in the Cook Islands. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 12(5), 462–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malone, K. (2015). Posthumanist approaches to theorising children’s human-nature relations. In K. Nairn & P. Kraftl (Eds.), Space, place and environment. Geographies of children and young people series (Vol. 3, pp. 1–22). London, England: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malone, K. (2017). Ecological posthumanist theorising: Grappling with child-dog-bodies. In K. Malone, S. Truong, & T. Gray (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability in precarious times. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malone, K. (2018). Children in the Anthropocene: Rethinking sustainability and child friendliness of cities. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search for a liveable world. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Qvortrup, J. (1999). Childhood and societal macrostructures. Working paper 9. Child and youth culture. Odense, Denmark: Department of Contemporary Cultural Studies, The University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  39. Rautio, P. (2013a). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rautio, P. (2013b). Being nature: Interspecies articulation as a species-specific practice of relating to environment. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 445–457.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.700698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, M. (2013). Ecological community, the sense of the world, and senseless extinction. Environmental Humanities, 2, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker, K. (2006). Doing research in environmental education: Touchstone theory and shaking things up. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolfe, C. (2009). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationFaculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Karen Malone
    • 1
  • Iris Duhn
    • 2
  • Marek Tesar
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Peninsula CampusMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations