Advertisement

Greedy Bags of Childhoodnature Theories

  • Karen MaloneEmail author
  • Iris Duhn
  • Marek Tesar
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to assemble a theoretical toolkit, a greedy bag of possibilities, that can enable childhood-nature encounters to flourish in the Anthropocene and beyond. In this undertaking, our aim is not to put diverse theoretical perspectives into competition with each other but rather to assemble theories as tools which can produce sparks when knocked together. These are theories that can be packed up and taken for a walk. Theories that can help us to get out of sticky situations. And theories which children themselves can use to address the crises which they will inevitably inherit (and already are). As such, this theory-infused section seeks to put multiple philosophical perspectives into consequential relations such that they can become productive in their directions and differences. In this chapter we take stock of theories that have been productive in the field childhood-nature up to this point, while at the same time seeking new theories, which are emerging in direct response to the contemporary planetary turn.

Keywords

Theoretical approaches Diffractive theorizing Speculative figurations Posthumanism New materialism Learning theory Spacetimematterings Place theory Object-oriented Place attachment 

References

  1. Barad, K. (2012, June). Intra-actions: An interview with Karen Barad by Adam Kleinman. Mousse, #34, 76–81.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandler, D. (2013). The world of attachment? The post-humanist challenge to freedom and necessity. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 516–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colebrook, C. (Ed.). (2010). Extinction: Framing the end of the species. London, UK: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987/2014). A thousand plateaus. (Translated and a foreword by B. Massumi). London, England: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (2005). On touching–Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Duhn, I., Malone, K., & Tesar, M. (2017). Troubling the Intersections of urban/nature/childhood in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1357–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haraway, D. (2011). SF: Science fiction, speculative fabulation, string figures, so far. Viewed Jan 30 2014. http://people.ucsc.edu/~haraway/Files/PilgrimAcceptanceHaraway.pdf.
  9. Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165. http://environmentalhumanities.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC/London, England: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  12. Harman, G. (2011). The quadruple object. Winchester, UK/Washington, DC: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  13. Harman, G. (2013). Bells and whistles: More speculative realism. Winchester, UK/Washington, DC: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  14. Head, L. (2016). Hope and grief in the anthropocene: Re-conceptualising human–nature relations. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodologies. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Malone, K. (2017). Children in the Anthropocene: Rethinking sustainability and child friendliness in cities. London, England: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Malone, K., & Waite, S. (2016). Student outcomes and natural schooling: Pathways from evidence to impact report. Plymouth, UK: Plymouth University. Retrieved from https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/6/6811/Student_outcomes_and__natural_schooling_pathways_to_impact_2016.pdf.  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3327.7681.
  19. Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Morton, T. (2016). Dark Ecology. For a logic of future coexistence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Quay, J. (2017). From human–Nature to cultureplace in education via an exploration of unity and relation in the work of Peirce and Dewey. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor, A., Blaise, M., & Guigni, M. (2013). Haraway’s ‘bag lady story-telling’: Relocating childhood and learning within a ‘post-human landscape’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 48–62.Google Scholar
  25. Van der Tuin, I. (2014). Diffraction as methodology as feminist onto-epistemology: On encountering chantal and chawaf and posthuman interpellation. Parallax, 20(3), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Waite, S. (2013). Knowing your place in the world: How place and culture support and obstruct educational aims. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waite, S. (2015). Culture clash and concord: Supporting early learning outdoors in the UK. In H. Prince, K. Henderson, & B. Humberstone (Eds.), International handbook of outdoor studies. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationFaculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Peninsula CampusMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Education and Social WorkThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Section editors and affiliations

  • Karen Malone
    • 1
  • Iris Duhn
    • 2
  • Marek Tesar
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Peninsula CampusMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations