Phytoliths in Archaeology: Chemical Aspects

  • Martin J. HodsonEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_3250-1

Introduction

Phytoliths have now become almost a routine aspect of many archaeological investigations. They are very widely used in many contexts to gain information about the plant species grown by or associated with humans in the past. Up until relatively recently most workers have used phytolith morphology to investigate archaeological contexts, and still the majority of papers published take that approach. However, there is increasing interest in using the chemical or even isotopic makeup of phytoliths to provide more information than is available merely from using morphology. The second key area where phytolith chemistry is important in archaeology is taphonomy. In particular, phytoliths with different chemistries might be expected to degrade in soils or sediments at different rates, and soil chemical conditions may also affect degradation. Both these factors could seriously impact on the interpretation of phytolith results from archaeological contexts.

Philippa Ryan wrote an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexandre, A., J. Crespin, F. Sylvestre, C. Sonzogni, and D.W. Hilbert. 2012. The oxygen isotopic composition of phytolith assemblages from tropical rainforest soil tops (Queensland, Australia): Validation of a new paleoenvironmental tool. Climate of the Past 8: 307–324.  https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-307-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandre, A., I. Basile-Doelsch, T. Delhaye, D. Borshneck, J.C. Mazur, P. Reyerson, and G.M. Santos. 2015. New highlights of phytolith structure and occluded carbon location: 3-D X-ray microscopy and NanoSIMS results. Biogeosciences 12: 863–873.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-863-2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asscher, Y., S. Weiner, and E. Boaretto. 2017. A new method for extracting the insoluble occluded carbon in archaeological and modern phytoliths: Detection of 14C depleted carbon fraction and implications for radiocarbon dating. Journal of Archaeological Science 78: 57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartoli, F. 1985. Crystallochemistry and surface properties of biogenic opal. Journal of Soil Science 36: 335–350.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1985.tb00340.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabanes, D., and R. Shahack-Gross. 2015. Understanding fossil phytolith preservation: The role of partial dissolution in paleoecology and archaeology. PLoS One 10 (5): e0125532.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carnelli, A.L., M. Madella, J.-P. Theurillat, and B. Ammann. 2002. Aluminum in the opal silica reticule of phytoliths: A new tool in palaeoecological studies. American Journal of Botany 89: 346–351.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.2.346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Currie, H.A., and C.C. Perry. 2007. Silica in plants: Biological, biochemical and chemical studies. Annals of Botany 100: 1383–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elbaum, R., C. Melamed-Bessudo, N. Tuross, A.A. Levy, and S. Weiner. 2009. New methods to isolate organic materials from silicified phytoliths reveal fragmented glycoproteins but no DNA. Quaternary International 193: 11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodson, M. 2016a. Carbon concentrations in phytoliths and carbon sequestration in soil. Journal of Brief Ideas. http://beta.briefideas.org/ideas/c2ee0d247f8fc516a87f2b0f385c6031.
  10. Hodson, M.J. 2016b. The development of phytoliths in plants and its influence on their chemistry and isotopic composition. Implications for palaeoecology and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 68: 62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodson, M.J., A.G. Parker, M.J. Leng, and H.J. Sloane. 2008. Silicon, oxygen and carbon isotope composition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phytoliths: Implications for palaeoecology and archaeology. Journal of Quaternary Science 23: 331–339.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, R.L., and A.H. Beavers. 1963. Some mineralogical and chemical properties of plant opal. Soil Science 96: 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar, S., M. Soukup, and R. Elbaum. 2017. Silicification in grasses: Variation between different cell types. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 438.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00438.Google Scholar
  14. Osterrieth, M., M. Madella, D. Zurro, and M.F. Alvarez. 2009. Taphonomical aspects of silica phytoliths in the loess sediments of the Argentinean Pampas. Quaternary International 193: 70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piperno, D.R. 2016. Phytolith radiocarbon dating in archaeological and paleoecological research: A case study of phytoliths from modern neotropical plants and a review of the previous dating evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 68: 54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prentice, A.J., and E.A. Webb. 2016. The effect of progressive dissolution on the oxygen and silicon isotope composition of opal-A phytoliths: Implications for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 453: 42–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.03.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryan, P. 2014. Phytolith studies in archaeology. In Encyclopedia of global archaeology, ed. C. Smith. New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/9781441904652_2258.Google Scholar
  18. Santos, G.M., A. Alexandre, J.R. Southon, K.K. Treseder, R. Corbineau, and P.E. Reyerson. 2012. Possible source of ancient carbon in phytolith concentrates from harvested grasses. Biogeosciences 9: 1873–1884.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1873-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Song, Z., H. Liu, C.A.E. Strömberg, X. Yang, and X. Zhang. 2017. Phytolith carbon sequestration in global terrestrial biomes. Science of the Total Environment 603–604: 502–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zuo, X., L. Houyuan, J. Leping, J. Zhang, X. Yang, X. Huan, K. He, C. Wang, and N. Wu. 2017. Dating rice remains through phytolith carbon-14 study reveals domestication at the beginning of the Holocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 114: 6486–6491.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704304114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health and Life SciencesOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • E. Christian Wells
    • 1
  • Arleyn Simon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.School of Human Evolution & Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA