Natural Hazards vs Cultural Heritage

  • Ionut Cristi NicuEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_3185-1

Introduction

Natural hazards are usually approached by geosciences (geology, geography); they are a cause of planetary evolution that can be divided into geological hazards (earthquakes, volcanic eruption), meteorological hazards (hailstorm, heat wave, cyclones, ice storm, tornado), and hydrological hazards (floods, droughts, mudslides). Over the last decades, due to the technological evolution, the research undertaken in order to understand and predict natural hazards has made serious progress. When a natural hazard is affecting the cultural heritage integrity, the process can be fast and lead to permanent destruction or slow, depending on the severity of the hazard. Along history, natural hazards lead to the destruction of some famous monuments: the pyroclastic flows from Vesuvius completely destroyed Pompeii in 79 A.D.; the Colossus of Rhodes and the Pharos Lighthouse have been destroyed by earthquakes in 227 B.C. and in the fourteenth century, respectively; mausoleum of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agapiou, A., and V. Lysandrou. 2015. Remote sensing archaeology: Tracking and mapping evolution in European scientific literature from 1999 to 2015. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 4: 192–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agapiou, A., V. Lysandrou, D.D. Alexakis, K. Themistocleous, B. Cuca, A. Argyriou, A. Sarris, and D.G. Hadjimitsis. 2015. Cultural heritage management and monitoring using remote sensing data and GIS: The case study of Paphos area, Cyprus. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54: 230–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gontz, A.M., C.V. Maio, E.K. Wagenknecht, and E.P. Berkland. 2011. Assessing threatened coastal sites: Applications of ground-penetrating radar and geographic information systems. Journal of Cultural Heritage 12: 451–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2011.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Khakzad, S., M. Pieters, and K. Van Balen. 2015. Coastal cultural heritage: A resource to be included in integrated coastal zone management. Ocean Coast Management 118: 110–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.07.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Khalil, A.M.R., N.Y. Hammouda, and K.F. El-Deeb. 2018. Implementing sustainability in retrofitting heritage buildings. Case study: Villa Antoniadis, Alexandria, Egypt. Heritage 1 (1): 6.  https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage1010006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lanza, S.G. 2003. Flood hazard on cultural heritage in the town of Genoa (Italy). Journal of Cultural Heritage 4: 159–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(03)00042-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. May, V. 2015. Coastal cliff conservation and management: The Dorset and East Devon coast world heritage site. Journal of Coastal Conservation 19 (6): 821–829.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0338-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Migoñ, P. 2013. Cultural heritage and natural hazards. In Encyclopedia of natural hazards, ed. P.T. Bobrowsky, 135–140. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nicu, I.C. 2016a. Hydrogeomorphic risk analysis affecting Chalcolithic archaeological sites from Valea Oii (Bahlui) watershed, Northeastern Romania: An interdisciplinary approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25709-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nicu, I.C. 2016b. Cultural heritage assessment and vulnerability using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems (Valea Oii catchment, North-Eastern Romania). An approach to historical maps. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 20: 103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicu, I.C., and G. Romanescu. 2016. Effect of natural risk factors upon the evolution of Chalcolithic human settlements in North-Eastern Romania (Valea Oii watershed). From ancient time dynamics to present day degradation. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 60 (1): 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1127/zfg/2015/0174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nicu, I.C. 2017a. Frequency ratio and GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility applied to cultural heritage assessment. Journal of Cultural Heritage 28: 172–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nicu, I.C. 2017b. Natural hazards – a threat for immovable cultural heritage. A review. International Journal of Conservation Science 8 (3): 375–388.Google Scholar
  14. Nicu, I.C. 2017c. Tracking natural and anthropic risks from historical maps as a tool for cultural heritage assessment: A case study. Environment and Earth Science 76 (9): 330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6656-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicu, I.C. 2018. Natural risk assessment and mitigation of cultural heritage sites from North-eastern Romania (Valea Oii river basin). Area.  https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12433.
  16. Nicu, I.C., and A. Asăndulesei. 2018. GIS-based evaluation of diagnostic areas in landslide susceptibility analysis of Bahluieț River Basin (Moldavian Plateau, NE Romania). Are Neolithic sites in danger? Geomorphology 314: 27–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pederson, J.L., P.A. Petersen, and J.L. Dierker. 2006. Gullying and erosion control at archaeological sites in Grand Canyon, Arizona. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31: 507–525.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Romanescu, G. 2013a. Geoarchaeology of the ancient and medieval Danube Delta: Modeling environmental and historical changes. A review. Quaternary International 293: 231–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Romanescu, G. 2013b. Alluvial transport processes and the impact of anthropogenic intervention on the Romanian littoral of the Danube Delta. Ocean and Coastal Management 73: 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Romanescu, G. 2014. The catchment area of the Milesian colony of Histria, within the Razim-Sinoie lagoon complex (Romania): Hydro-geomorphologic, economic and geopolitical implications. Area 46 (3): 320–327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Romanescu, G., and I.C. Nicu. 2014. Risk maps for gully erosion affecting archaeological sites in Moldavia, Romania. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 58 (4): 509–523.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2014/0133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Romanescu, G., V. Cotiugă, A. Asăndulesei, and C.C. Stoleriu. 2012a. Use of the 3-D scanner in mapping and monitoring the dynamic degradation of soils: Case study of the Cucuteni-Baiceni Gully on the Moldavian Plateau (Romania). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16: 953–966.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-953-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Romanescu G, V. Cotiugă, A. Asăndulesei. 2012b. Use of terrestrial 3D laser scanner in cartographing and monitoring relief dynamics and habitation space from various historical periods. In Cartography – a tool for spatial analysis, ed. C. Bateira, 49–74. InTech: Croatia.  https://doi.org/10.5772/47776.Google Scholar
  24. Sdao, F., and V. Simeone. 2007. Mass movements affecting goddess Mafitis sanctuary in Russano din Vaglio (Basilicata, southern Italy). Journal of Cultural Heritage 8: 77–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2006.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sdao, F., D.S. Lioi, S. Pascale, D. Caniani, and I.M. Mancini. 2013. Landslide susceptibility assessment by using a neuro-fuzzy model: A case study in the Rupestrian heritage rich area of Matera. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13: 395–407.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-395-2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tarragüel, A.A., B. Krol, and C. van Westen. 2012. Analysing the possible impact of landslides and avalanches on cultural heritage in Upper Svaneti, Georgia. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13: 453–461.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Usmanov, B., I.C. Nicu, I. Gainullin, and P. Khomyakov. 2018. Monitoring and assessing the destruction of archaeological sites from Kuibyshev reservoir coastline, Tatarstan Republic, Russian Federation. A case study. Journal of Coastal Conservation 22 (2): 417–429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0590-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, J.-J. 2015. Flood risk maps to cultural heritage: Measures and process. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16: 210–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Will, T., and H.-R. Meier. 2007. Cultural heritage and natural disasters: Risk preparedness and the limits of prevention. In Cultural heritage and natural disasters risk preparedness and the limits of prevention: Heritage at risk, ed. M. Hans-Rudolf, M. Petzet, and W. Thomas, Special ed., 9–20. Dresden: TUDpress.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Agapiou, A., V. Lysandrou, K. Themistocleous, and D.G. Hadjimitsis. 2016. Risk assessment of cultural heritage sites clusters using satellite imagery and GIS: The case study of Paphos District, Cyprus. Natural Hazards 83 (1): 5–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2211-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Howard, A.J. 2013. Managing global heritage in the face of future climate change: The importance of understanding geological and geomorphological processes and hazards. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (7): 632–658.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.681680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Margottini, C., F. Fidolini, C. Iadanza, A. Trigila, and Y. Ubelmann. 2015. The conservation of the Shahr-e-Zohak archaeological site (Central Afghanistan): Geomorphological processes and ecosystem-based mitigation. Geomorphology 239: 73–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Marzeion, B., and A. Levermann. 2014. Loss of cultural world heritage and currently inhabited places to sea-level rise. Environmental Research Letters 9 (3).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McKercher, B., P.S.Y. Ho, and H. du Cros. 2005. Relationship between tourism and cultural heritage management: Evidence from Hong Kong. Tourism Management 26: 539–548.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pavlova, I., A. Makarigakis, T. Depret, and V. Jomelli. 2017. Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness at world heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage 28: 151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Vecco, M. 2010. A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11 (3): 321–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Watt, J., J. Tidblad, V. Kucera, and R. Hamilton, eds. 2009. The effects of air pollution on cultural heritage. US: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU), High North Department, Fram CentreTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Flinders University, College of Humanities, Arts and Social SciencesAdelaideAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Thanik Lertcharnrit
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologySilpakorn UniversityBangkokThailand