Indigenous Method and Theory in Archaeology

  • Paulette F. SteevesEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_2736-1

State of Knowledge and Current Debates

Indigenous method and theory (IMT) in archaeology, carried out by Indigenous scholars and communities, is an act of reclaiming, revivance, and retelling, weaving Indigenous knowledge into discussions of Indigenous histories. IMT foregrounds Indigenous identities and empowers Indigenous communities, when Indigenous scholars and communities are in power and control of archaeological design and interpretations. IMT in archaeology weaves Indigenous knowledge through sacred sites, stories ancestors left on the land, and creates a richer more informed view of the Indigenous past. IMT recognizes Indigenous elders, storytellers, and community scholars as knowledge holders (Wilson 2007a, 325) that are the center of community histories, rather than informants who are outside the processes of knowledge production.

Indigenous archaeology has been described as archaeology with, for, and by, Indigenous people (Atalay 2006, 283). The differences between, with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atalay, S. 2006. Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. American Indian Quarterly 30: 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. 2002. Lifting the blankets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brisbane. Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Barnhardt, R. 2005. Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology & education quarterly 36(1):8–23.Google Scholar
  4. Basso, K.H. 1996. Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  5. Battiste, M., and Y. Henderson, eds. 2000. Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing LTD.Google Scholar
  6. Bessarab, D., and B. Ng’andu. 2010. Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies 3 (1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, L.A., and S. Strega, eds. 2005. Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  8. Byrd, J.A. 2009. ‘In the City of Blinding Lights’: Indigeneity, Cultural Studies and the Errants of Colonial Nostalgia. Cultural Studies Review 15(2):13–28.Google Scholar
  9. Cajete, G. 2000. Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light.Google Scholar
  10. Castellano Brant, Marlene. 1999. Renewing the relationship. A perspective on the impact of the Royal Commission on aboriginal peoples. In Aboriginal self Government of Canada, ed. John H. Hylton. Saskatchewan: Purich Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Chirikure, S., G. Pwiti, C. Damm, C.A. Folorunso, D.M. Hughes, C. Phillips, … and G. Pwiti (2008). Community involvement in archaeology and cultural heritage management: An assessment from case studies in Southern Africa and elsewhere. Current Anthropology 49 (3): 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., T.J. Ferguson, D. Lippert, R.H. McGuire, G.P. Nicholas, J.E. Watkins, and L.J. Zimmerman. 2010. The premise and promise of indigenous archaeology. American Antiquity 75 (2): 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damm, C. 2005. Archaeology, ethnohistory, and oral traditions: Approaches to the indigenous past. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38 (2): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deloria, V. 1995. Red earth, white lies: Native Americans and the myth of scientific fact. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Duran, Eduardo. 2006. Healing the Soulwound: Counseling with American Indians and other native peoples. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Echo-Hawk, Roger. 2000. Ancient history in the New World: Integrating oral traditions and the archaeological record in deep time. American Antiquity 65 (2): 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gegeo, D.W., and K.A. Watson-Gegeo. 2001. “How we know”: Kwara’ae rural villagers doing indigenous epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific 13: 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gnecco, C., and P. Ayala. 2011. Indigenous peoples and archaeology in Latin America. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  19. Handsman, R.G. 2003. Towards archaeological histories of the Nipmuc Indian Community in the “Lost Century” (1820–1920). A theoretical foundation for indigenous archaeologies.Google Scholar
  20. Institute for Aboriginal Development. 2000. Aboriginal art and culture Center-Alice Springs. http://www.aboriginalart.com.au/culture/dreamtime.html
  21. Irabinna Rigney, Lester. 1997. ‘Internationalism of an aboriginal or Torres Strait islander anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies, a guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles’ In Research and Development in Higher Education, Advancing International Perspectives. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, Annual international conference proceedings 20, 629–636.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, G., and C. Smith. 2005. Living and learning on aboriginal lands; In: Claire Smith & Hans Martin Wobst (eds) Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practice. Routledge. pp. 328–351 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. Julien, D.M., T. Bernard, and L.M. Rosenmeier. 2010. Paleo is not our word: Protecting and growing a Mi’ kmaw place. In Indigenous archaeologies. A reader on decolonization, ed. M. Bruchac et al. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kennedy, Stephanie M. 2010. Indigenous archaeology: Historical interpretation from an emic perspective. Nebraska Anthropologist paper 55. Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska-Lincoln. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/55
  25. Kovach, M. 2005. Emerging from the margins, indigenous methodologies. In Research as resistance, critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches, ed. Leslie Brown and Susan Strega. Toronto: Ontario, Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kovach, M. 2009. Indigenous methodologies. Toronto: Universtiy of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  27. LaRocque, E. 2011. When the other is me: Native resistance discourse, 1850–1990. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
  28. Little Bear, Leroy. 2000. Jagged worldviews colliding. In Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision, ed. M. Battiste. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, K. 2003. Aboriginal people, aboriginal lands and Indigenist research: A discussion of research pasts and neo-colonial research futures. Unpublished masters thesis. Townsville, James Cook University.Google Scholar
  30. Martin-Booran Mirraboopa, Karen. 2003. Ways of knowing, ways of being and ways of doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous re-search and Indigenist research… voicing dissent, new talents 21C, next generation Australian studies. Journal of Australian Studies 76: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGhee, R. 2008. Aboriginalism and the problems of indigenous archaeology. American Antiquity 73(4):579–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGuire, Randall H. 1992. Archaeology and the First Americans. American Anthropologist 94(4):816–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuire, Randall H. 2008. Archaeology as political action. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mihesuah, D.A., ed. 1998. Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  35. Parrish, O., D. Murley, R. Jewett, and K. Lightfoot. 2000. The science of archaeology and the response from within native California: The archaeology and Ethnohistory of Me?tini Village in the Fort Ross State Historic Park. Proceedings of the Society for California Archaeology 13: 84–87.Google Scholar
  36. Porsanger, J. 2004. An essay about indigenous methodology. Nordlit 8 (1): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Preston, Susan M. 1999. Meaning and representation. Landscape in the oral traditions of the Eastern James Bay Cree. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Guelph.Google Scholar
  38. Reimer, R. 2012. The mountains and rocks are forever: Lithics and landscapes of skwxwú7mesh uxwumixw. (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
  39. Rigney, Lester-Irabinna. 1999. Internationalization of an indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies. Wicazo SA Review, Fall 14 (2): 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rika-Heke, M. 2010. Archaeology and Indigeneity in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century, vol. 197. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  41. Simpson, Leanne. 2008. Oshkimmadiziig, the new people. In Lighting the eighth fire: The liberation, resurgence, and protection of Indigenous Nations, ed. Leanne Simpson. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Sinclair, R. 2003. Indigenous research in social work: The challenge of operationalizing worldview. Native Social Work Journal 5: 117–139.Google Scholar
  43. Sium, A., and E. Ritskes. 2013. Speaking truth to power: Indigenous storytelling as an act of living resistance. Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education & Society 2(1):3.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, C., and H.M. Wobst, eds. 2004a. Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonising theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, C., and H.M. Wobst. 2004b. 21 the next step: An archaeology for social justice. In Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonising theory and practice, vol. 369. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Smith-Tuhiwai, L.T. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed books.Google Scholar
  47. Steeves, P.F. 2015a. Decolonizing the past and present of the Western hemisphere (The Americas). Archaeologies 11 (1): 42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steeves, P.F. 2015b. Decolonizing indigenous histories, Pleistocene archaeology sites of the Western Hemisphere. State University of New York at Binghamton.Google Scholar
  49. Terszack, M. 2008. Orphaned by the colour of my skin: A stolen generation story. Maleny: Verdant House.Google Scholar
  50. Tur, S.U., F.R. Blanch, and C. Wilson. 2010. Developing a collaborative approach to standpoint in indigenous Australian research. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 39 (S1): 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watson-Gegeo, K., and G. White. 1990. Conflict discourse in Pacific societies. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wilcox, M. 2010. Saving indigenous peoples from ourselves: Separate but equal archaeology is not scientific archaeology. American Antiquity 75 (2): 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson, S. 2001. What is an indigenous research methodology? Canadian Journal of Native Education 25 (2): 175–179.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, Waziyatawin A. 2004. Indigenous knowledge recovery is indigenous empowerment. American Indian Quarterly 28 (3/4): 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson, C.L. 2007a. Indigenous research and archaeology: Transformative practices in/with/for the Ngarrindjeri community. Archaeologies 3 (3): 320–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson, C. 2007b. Ngarrindjeri experiences of repatriations: Engaging in an effective consultation process for returning old people. Indigenous Law Bulletin 6 (29): 16.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Yellowhorn, Eldon. 2002. Awakening Internalist archaeology in the aboriginal world. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Department of Anthropology, McGill University.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Atalay, S. 2008. Multivocality and indigenous archaeologies. In Evaluating multiple narratives, 29–44. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battiste, M., ed. 2000. Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver: UBC Press, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  3. Bendremer, J.C. 2008. Hie tribe and the trowel an indigenous archaeology and the Mohegan archaeological field school. In Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, ed. Jeffrey C. Bendremer and Elaine L. Thomas, vol. 2, 50. Tucson University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, T.L., ed. 2001. The future of the past: Archaeologists, native Americans, and repatriation. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  5. Bruchac, M., S. Hart, and H.M. Wobst, eds. 2016. Indigenous archaeologies: A reader on decolonization. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Byrd, Jodi A. 2011. The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chilisa, Bagele. 2012. Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Denzin, N.K., Y.S. Lincoln, and L.T. Smith, eds. 2008. Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Foley, D. 2003. Indigenous epistemology and indigenous standpoint theory. Social Alternatives 22 (1): 44.Google Scholar
  10. Gegeo, D.W., and K.A. Watson-Gegeo. 2001. “How we know”: Kwara’ae rural villagers doing indigenous epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific 13: 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haber, A.F. 2007. Reframing social equality within an intercultural archaeology. World Archaeology 39 (2): 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isaacson, K. 2010. Archaeological reflections of a 68-year-old bushman. In Being and becoming indigenous archaeologists, 139. Walnut Creek: Lest Coast Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kato, H. 2009. Whose archaeology?: Decolonizing archaeological perspective in Hokkaido Island. Journal of the Graduate School of Letters 4: 47–55.Google Scholar
  14. Lydon, J., and U.Z. Rizvi, eds. 2016. Handbook of postcolonial archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Oxenham, D. 2000. Aboriginal terms of reference: A course paper for the indigenous studies program. Perth: Gunada Press, Curtin Indigenous Research Centre, Curtin University.Google Scholar
  16. Phillips, C., and H. Allen, eds. 2010. Bridging the divide: Indigenous communities and archaeology into the 21st century. Vol. 60. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rigney, L.I. 1997. Internationalisation of an indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to indigenous research methodology and its principles. The Journal for Native American Studies, WICAZO SA Review 14 (2, Fall edition): 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silliman, S.W., ed. 2008. Collaborating at the trowel’s edge: teaching and learning in indigenous archaeology. Vol. 2. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, C., and Wobst, H. M. eds. 2004. Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonising theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon, M., and S. Forbes. 2010. Bridging the Divide: Indigenous Communities and Archaeology into the 21st Century. Indigenous Archaeology 60: 213.Google Scholar
  21. Watkins, J. 2001. Indigenous archaeology: American Indian values and scientific practice. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  22. Weber-Pillwax, C. 2001. What is Indigenous research?. Canadian Journal of Native Education 25(2):166.Google Scholar
  23. Wingard, B., and J. Lester. 2001. Telling our stories in ways that make us stronger. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Youngblood Henderson, J.S. 2000. Ayukpachi: Empowering Aboriginal thought. In Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision, ed. M. Battiste, 248–278. Vancouver: UBC Press, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History & PhilosophyAlgoma UniversitySault Ste. MarieCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ndukukhaye Ndlovu
    • 1
  1. 1.Newcastle UniversityNewcastleUK