Repatriation Acts: NAGPRA Repatriation in Tribal Practice

  • Matthew LiebmannEmail author
Living reference work entry

More than 25 years have passed since the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) became law in the United States. According to the National NAGPRA program, this law has resulted in the return of the remains of more than 50,000 individuals, 1.4 million funerary objects, and over 14,000 sacred objects/objects of cultural patrimony to Native American tribes ( It has also resulted in the publication of numerous books and articles investigating the myriad issues surrounding the law (Fine-Dare 2002; Killion 2008; Mihesuah 2000; Colwell 2017), including the conditions leading to its passage (Thomas 2000), its legislative background and history (Trope and Echo-Hawk 1992; Lovis et al. 2004), implementation (Anyon and Thornton 2003), and the responses of various stakeholders (Ayau and Tengan 2002; Preucel et al. 2003).

This entry seeks to give insight into the process of repatriation on the tribal side of the law. How...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Anyon, Roger, and Russell Thornton. 2003. Implementing repatriation in the United States: Issues raised and lessons learned. In The dead and their possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy, and practice, ed. C. Fforde, J. Hubert, and P. Turnbull, 190–198. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ayau, Edward Halealoho, and Ty Kawika Tengan. 2002. Ka Huaka’i O Na ‘Oiwi: The journey home. In The dead and their possessions: Repatriation in principle, policy and practice, ed. C. Fforde, J. Hubert, and P. Turnbull, 191–189. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Colwell, Chip. 2017. Plundered skulls and stolen spirits: Inside the fight to reclaim native America’s culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deloria, Vine. 1995. Red earth, white lies: Native Americans and the myth of scientific fact. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  5. Ferguson, T.J., Roger Anyon, and Edmund J. Ladd. 2000. Repatriation at the pueblo of Zuni: Diverse solutions to complex problems. In Repatriation reader: Who owns American Indian remains? ed. D. Mihesuah, 239–265. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fine-Dare, Kathleen S. 2002. Grave injustice: The American Indian repatriation movement and NAGPRA. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  7. Killion, Thomas W., ed. 2008. Opening archaeology: Repatriation’s impact on contemporary research and practice. Santa Fe: SAR Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lovis, William A., Keith W. Kintigh, Vincas P. Steponaitis, and Lynne G. Goldstein. 2004. Archaeological perspectives on the NAGPRA: Underlying principles, legislative history, and current issues. In Legal perspectives on cultural resources, ed. J.R. Richman and M.P. Forsyth, 165–184. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  9. Mihesuah, Devon A., ed. 2000. Repatriation reader: Who owns American Indian remains? Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  10. Odegaard, Nancy, and Alyce Sadongei. 2005. Old poisons, new problems: A museum resource for managing contaminated cultural materials. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  11. Preucel, Robert W., Lucy F. Williams, Stacy O. Espenlaub, and Janet Monge. 2003. Out of heaviness, enlightenment: NAGPRA and the University of Pennsylvania Museum of archaeology and anthropology. Expedition 45 (3): 21–27.Google Scholar
  12. Thomas, David Hurst. 2000. Skull wars. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Trope, Jack F., and Walter R. Echo-Hawk. 1992. The native American graves protection and repatriation act: Background and legislative history. Arizona State Law Journal 24 (1): 35–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Uzma Z. Rizvi
    • 1
  1. 1.Brooklyn CampusPratt InstituteBrooklynUSA