Advertisement

TVET Teaching in the Time of Digitization

  • Mike Douse
  • Philip Uys
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Digitization is fundamentally altering our world and, with it, the roles, requirements, and potential of TVET. While its definition and scope will undoubtedly change – one very possible scenario is for there to be no discrete TVET sector in a few decades’ time – the demand for work-related skills provision will be massive, multifarious, and lifelong, and this will need to be met, imaginatively, efficiently, and equitably. The necessity is to reinvent TVET for our times, and the central challenge is to conceptualize and create TVET structures, methodologies, and arrangements appropriate to these dramatically new digital age circumstances. This calls for a redefined and high-status TVET, delivered from various (often virtual) kinds of centers, each dynamically responsive to trainees’ aspirations and to forthcoming market requirements. All should be staffed by competent, confident, cheerful, and well-respected instructors, working effectively in tandem with the best-suited technology, to guide the learning rather than to dictate it. Life skills should be redefined for the digital age; well-informed creativity should be emphasized; the moral dimension – worldwide imperfections, rampant inequalities, and the shame of migrant labor – should be addressed. The selection, preservice, and lifelong professional development of TVET instructors should similarly take advantage of contemporary technology. TVET instructor education should model digital age teaching and learning and, in addition, play a key role in recreating and repositioning the sector.

Keywords

Digitization TVET Skills Instructors Instruction E-learning 

References

  1. AACTE (2010) Educator preparation and 21st century skills: a blueprint for change: an initial look at key principles. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education Advisory Group and the Strategic Council of the Partnership for 21st Century SkillsGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackburn T (2017) The comprehensive university: an alternative to social stratification by academic selection. HEPI occasional paper 16. Accessed on 25 Aug 2017. http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Hepi-The-Comprehensive-University_Occasional-Paper-17-11_07_17.pdf
  3. Bonk C (2016) Education 3.0: the learning world of Middle Earth is fast changing! http://www.trainingshare.com/pdfs/Education_3_New_Zealand_April_2016.pptx
  4. Conference Board of Canada (2014). Employability skills 2000+. Accessed on 25 Aug 2017. http://www.conferenceboard.ca/Libraries/EDUC_PUBLIC/esp2000.sflb
  5. Contact North (2016). How ten key developments are shaping the future of technology-enabled learning. Accessed on 25 Aug 2017. http://teachonline.ca/print/tools-trends/how-ten-key-developments-are-shaping-future-technology-enabled-learning
  6. Douse M (2013) Chalkboards and cheeseboards – resisting the workplace’s colonisation of the schoolroom. Posted on July 29, 2013 by NORRAG, Network for Policy Research, Review and Advice on Education and Training, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. Douse M (2014) An enjoyment of education (ISBN 978-3-659-52884-2). LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, April 2014Google Scholar
  8. Douse M (2015) TVET that works: lessons from the skills development project; Directorate of Technical Education, Bangladesh Ministry of Education, Dhaka, June 2015Google Scholar
  9. Douse M, Uys P (2018) Educational planning in the time of digitisation. Educ Plann 25(2):7–23. International Society for Educational Planning, KennesawGoogle Scholar
  10. European Union (2017). Leonardo da Vinci – vocational education and training, Brussels. Accessed 1 Aug 2017. http://movingproject.eu/pdf/Leonardo_creativity_en.pdf
  11. Guardian (2015) Nepalese migrants building the infrastructure to host the 2022 World Cup have died at a rate of one every two days in 2014. Guardian, page 7, 13th January 2015, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassel BC et al (2012) Teachers in the age of digital instruction. In: Finn CE (ed) Education reform for the digital era. Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Washington DC, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  13. Manpower Services Commission (1983) In: Wild J (ed) Occupational outlook, an occasional report on prospects. Department of Employment Group in the United Kingdom, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  14. Middleton H (2011) Creativity in technical and further education in Australia. The Open Education Journal, 2011, 4 (Supplement 1:M9) 95-104 95 1874-9208/11 2011, Bentham Open AccessCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mustapha RB (2017) TVET in the digital age: implications on learning and teaching. University-Community Transformation Centre, Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogbonna CC (2015) Creativity and inventions in vocational and technical education. J Teach Perspect 10(1). ISSN 2006 – 0173. Agricultural Education Department, Federal College of Education, Osiele, AbeokutaGoogle Scholar
  17. Peddle P (2017) University transformation & industry education collaboration. EdTech FUTURE: EdTech and The Future of Education is NOW! Motivis Learning CEO on, interviewGoogle Scholar
  18. Powers W (2011) Hamlet’s blackberry. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Robles MM (2012) Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Bus Commun Q 75(4):453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. UK Parliament (2015) Digital skills strategy. Select Committee on Digital Skills Report, Make or Break: The UK’s Digital Future, 2015. Report: Make or Break: The UK’s Digital Future (HTML)Google Scholar
  21. UNESCO-UNIVOC (2012) Transforming TVET: building skills for work and life. The Shanghai consensus: recommendations of the third international congress on technical and vocational education and training, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, 14–16 May 2012Google Scholar
  22. US Department of Labor (2013) Occupational outlook handbook. Accessed on 25 Aug. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/home.htm
  23. Uys PM (2007) Enterprise-wide technological transformation in higher education: the LASO model. International Journal of Educational Management, Emerald. (ISSN: 0951-354X)Google Scholar
  24. Uys PM (2009) Change and innovation strategies during the implementation of an open source LMS: an Australian case study. Paper presented at the V International Conference on Multimedia and ICT in Education (m-ICTE2009). LisbonGoogle Scholar
  25. Uys PM (2010) Implementing an open source learning management system: a critical analysis of change strategies. Australas J Educ Technol 26(7):980–995. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/uys.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uys PM (2015) Using the LASO model to review a learning management system implementation to enhance distance e-learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th ICDE (International Council for Distance Education) World Conference. ICDE, Sun City.Google Scholar
  27. Uys PM, Douse M (2017) Digitisation, learning and teaching for sustainable development: curriculum, cognition and context in the digital age. Paper presented at the 14th UKFIET international conference on education and development, 5th September 2017 on learning and teaching for sustainable development: curriculum, cognition and context, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. WorldSkills (2017) WorldSkills Abu Dhabi 2017. Information. https://worldskillsabudhabi2017.com/en/skills/. Accessed Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International ConsultantEnnis, ClareIreland
  2. 2.Learning TechnologiesCharles Sturt UniversityOrangeAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Margarita Pavlova
    • 1
  • Salim Akoojee
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  2. 2.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations