Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Postmodern Approaches in the Use of Genograms

  • Jacob MosgaardEmail author
  • Monica Sesma-Vazquez
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_829

Introduction

In the field of couples and family therapy, genograms are widely known and used as graphic tools for gathering general or detailed information about family structure and interpersonal relationships, including relevant data regarding family demographics and key aspects of the past and present. Systemic family therapist Monica McGoldrick is not only a pioneer in developing, popularizing, and describing how to depict different family structures, and establishing codes and symbols, but she also proposes diverse modalities to utilize genograms as therapeutic instruments for assessments and interventions (McGoldrick et al. 2008).

A genogram is designed to help understand family composition, dynamics, and patterns across generations. Genograms in a sense are versions of family trees. Some people define them as graphic representations for mapping psychological factors and transgenerational relationship punctuations that influence individuals’ behaviors, emotions, and performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Cecchin, G., Lane, G., & Ray, W. A. (1992). Irreverence: A strategy for therapists’ survival. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  3. Iversen, R. R., Gergen, K. J., & Fairbanks, R. P., II. (2005). Assessment and social construction: Conflict or co-creation? British Journal of Social Work, 35(5), 689–708.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Mosgaard, J. (in press). Therapy as anthropology. In S. Schliewe, N. Chaudhary, & P. Marsico (Eds.), Cultural psychology of intervention in the globalized world. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Paré, D. A. (1995). Of families and other cultures: The shifting paradigm of family therapy. Family Process, 34(1), 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00001.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T. E. (2014). Open dialogues and anticipations: Respecting otherness in the present moment. Helsinki: THL, Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
  8. Sesma-Vazquez, M. (2011). Pathways to dialogue: The work of collaborative therapists with couples. International Journal of Collaborative Practices, 2(1), 48–66.Google Scholar
  9. Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for withness’-thinking. Organization Studies, 27(4), 585–604.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606062105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kongens LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Margarita Tarragona
    • 1
  1. 1.PositivaMente & Grupo Campos ElíseosMexico CityMexico