Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Precontemplation in Couple and Family Therapy

  • Carlo C. DiClementeEmail author
  • Alicia E. Wiprovnick
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_585

Synonyms

Low readiness to change; Resistant; Unmotivated

Introduction and Theoretical Context

Stages of change represent a series of steps and tasks that assist in understanding the multidimensional nature of the process of intentional behavior change. According to the transtheoretical model (TTM), the process begins with an individual in precontemplation (not considering change) through contemplation (decision making), preparation (planning and committing), and action (making the change) to reach maintenance where the new behavior is sustained and integrated into one’s life (Prochaska and DiClemente 1984). When individuals in couples and family therapy need to make changes in behaviors, the stages can be helpful for understanding their readiness and motivation. Thus, assessing stage status enables therapists to match their approaches to meet the needs of clients in different stages. However, motivation may differ for different members of the couple or family system. Often family...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cordova, J. V., Scott, R. L., Dorian, M., Mirgain, S., Yaeger, D., & Groot, A. (2005). The marriage checkup: An indicated preventive intervention for treatment-avoidant couples at risk for marital deterioration. Behavior Therapy, 36(4), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Heatherington, L., Friedlander, M. L., & Greenberg, L. (2005). Change process research in couple and family therapy: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1998). Acceptance and change in couple therapy: A therapist’s guide to transforming relationships. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). You can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink’: Exploring children’s engagement and resistance in family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 491–507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9220-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1984). Self change processes, self efficacy and decisional balance across five stages of smoking cessation. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 156, 131–140.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sean Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International UniversitySacramentoUSA