Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Contemplation as a Stage of Change in Couple and Family Therapy

  • Carlo C. DiClementeEmail author
  • Alicia E. Wiprovnick
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_558

Synonyms

Ambivalence; Considering Change; Decision-making; Decisional balance; Risk reward analysis

Overview and Theoretical Context

Stages of change represent a series of steps and tasks that assist in understanding the multidimensional nature of the process of intentional behavior change. According to the transtheoretical model (TTM), the process begins with an individual in precontemplation and not considering change through contemplation (decision-making), preparation (planning and committing), and action (making the change and revising the plan) to reach maintenance where the new behavior is sustained and integrated into one’s life (Prochaska and DiClemente 1984). When individuals in couples and family therapy need to make a change in personal or interpersonal behaviors, the stages can be helpful for understanding their readiness and motivation. Thus, assessing stage status enables therapists to match their approaches to meet the needs of clients in different stages of change....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bradford, K. (2012). Assessing readiness for couple therapy: The stages of Relationship Change Questionnaire. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(3), 486–501.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00211.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cordova, J. V., Scott, R. L., Dorian, M., Mirgain, S., Yaeger, D., & Groot, A. (2005). The marriage checkup: An indicated preventive intervention for treatment-avoidant couples at risk for marital deterioration. Behavior Therapy, 36(4), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DiClemente, C. C. (2003). Addiction and change: How addictions develop and addicted people recover. New York: Guilford Press. (Released in paperback in 2006).Google Scholar
  4. Heatherington, L., Friedlander, M. L., & Greenberg, L. (2005). Change process research in couple and family therapy: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 18–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1998). Acceptance and change in couple therapy: A therapist’s guide to transforming relationships. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. NYC: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lebow, J., & Rekart, K. N. (2007). Integrative family therapy for high-conflict divorce with disputes over child custody and visitation. Family Process, 46(1), 79–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, W. R., & Rose, G. S. (2015). Motivational interviewing and decisional balance: Contrasting procedures for responding to client ambivalence. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 43(2), 129–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of therapy. Malabar: Krieger.Google Scholar
  11. Stotts, A. L., DiClemente, C. C., Carbonari, J. P., & Mullen, P. D. (2000). Postpartum return to smoking: Staging a suspended behavior. Health Psychology, 19(4), 324–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Velasquez, M., DiClemente, C., Crouch, C., & Stephens, N. (2015). Group treatment for substance abuse: Stages of change therapy manual (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Rachel Diamond
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Saint JosephWest HarfordUSA