Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Pairs Enrichment Program

  • Mo Therese HannahEmail author
  • Rita DeMaria
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_370

Name of the Model

Practical Application of Intimate Relationship Skills (PAIRS)

Introduction

PAIRS is a comprehensive relationship education program that serves as a bridge between marriage education/enrichment (primary and secondary intervention) and marital therapy (tertiary intervention). The model integrates marital enrichment, education, and therapeutic treatment in the support of healthy couple relationships (DeMaria 2003). PAIRS focuses on the essential role that primary relationships play in shaping our thoughts and feelings which in turn has a powerful impact on how we view ourselves and perceive and respond to other human beings.

With its broad focus and appeal, the PAIRS program is suitable for couples in relatively healthy, non-distressed relationships who wish to deepen their intimacy, as well as for distressed couples experiencing significant relationship difficulties (DeMaria 2005; Greenberg and Johnson 1988; Hawley and Olson 1995; Wampler 1982; Zimpher 1988). It is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen, W. D., & Olson, D. H. (2001). Five types of African American marriages based on ENRICH. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(3), 301–314.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, R., & Hannah, M. (1999). Preventive approaches to coupled therapy. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, V., Hawkins, A. J., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2009). Investigating the effects of marriage and relationship education on couples’ communication skills: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(2), 203–214. American Psychological Association.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Casriel, D. (1972). A scream away from happiness. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.Google Scholar
  5. Casriel, D. (1983). The relationship road map (Videotaped lecture). Falls Church: PAIRS Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. DeMaria, R. (1998). Satisfaction, couple type, divorce potential, conflict styles, attachment patterns, and romantic and sexual satisfaction of married couples who participated in a marital enrichment program (PAIRS) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr.Google Scholar
  7. DeMaria, R. (2005). Distressed couples and marriage education. Family Relations, 54(2), 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeMaria, R., & Hannah, M. (2003). Building intimate relationships: Clinical applications of the PAIRS program. New York: Brunner Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Durana, C. (1994). The use of bonding and emotional expressiveness in the PAIRS training: A psychoeducational approach for couples. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 5(2), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durana, C. (1996a). A longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of the PAIRS psychoeducational program for couples. Family Therapy, 23, 11–36.Google Scholar
  11. Durana, C. (1996b). Bonding and emotional re-education of couples in the PAIRS training: Part I. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(3), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durana, C. (1996c). Bonding and emotional re-education of couples in the PAIRS training: Part II. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(4), 315–328.Google Scholar
  13. Durana, C. (1997). Enhancing marital intimacy through psychoeducation: The PAIRS program. The Family Journal, 5(3), 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrett, J., & Olson, D.H. (2006) ENRICH couple typology and Hispanic and Caucasian married couples. Unpublished manuscript, Life Innovations, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  15. Giblin, P. (1986). Research and assessment in marriage and family enrichment: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 2, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon, L. H. (1992). Training manual and curriculum guide, Vols. I and II. Falls Church: PAIRS Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, L., & Frandsen, J. (1993, 2001). Passage to Intimacy (Revised Edition). Fireside, Falls Church, VA.Google Scholar
  18. Gordon, L., DeMaria, R., Haggerty, V., & Hayes, E. (2007). PAIRS SHM facilitator’s guide and curriculum for managers, facilitators, and family support staff. Weston: PAIRS Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. (1988). Emotionally focused couples therapy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Guerney, B., & Maxson, P. (1990). Marital and family enrichment research: A decade review and look ahead. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1127–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawley, D. R., & Olson, D. H. (1995). Enriching newlyweds: An evaluation of three enrichment programs. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsueh, J., Alderson, D. P., Lundquist, E., Michalopoulos, C., Gubits, D., Fein, D., & Knox, V. (2012). The supporting healthy marriage evaluation: Early impacts on low-income families. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  23. Hunt, R., Hof, L., & DeMaria, R. (1998). Marriage enrichment, preparation, mentoring and outreach. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, S. (1986). Bonds or bargains: Relationship paradigms and their significance for marital therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mattson, D. L., Christensen, O. J., & England, J. T. (1990). The effectiveness of a specific marital enrichment program: Time. Individual Psychology, 46(1), 88–92.Google Scholar
  26. Olson, D. (2011). FACES IV and circumplex model. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3(1), 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson, D. H., & Fowers, B. J. (1993). Five types of marriage: An empirical typology based on ENRICH. The Family Journal, 1(3), 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peluso, P. ( 2011). Relationship education impact reports, PAIRS Foundation for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. http://evaluation.pairs.com/reports/pairs050510.pdf.
  29. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner, L., & Gordon, L. H. (1995). PAIRS (Practical Application of Intimate Relationship Skills): An integrative approach to intimate relationship change through a psychoeducational program. Journal of Couples Therapy, 5(1–2), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wampler, K. S. (1982). The effectiveness of the Minnesota Couple Communication Program: A review of research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zimpher, D. G. (1988). Marriage enrichment programs: A review. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 13, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Siena CollegeLoudonvilleUSA
  2. 2.Advanced Clinician, Imago Relationship Therapy/Imago Relationships InternationalGlen EllynUSA
  3. 3.Couple and Family Therapy ProgramJefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Post-Graduate MFT Certificate ProgramCouncil for RelationshipsPhiladelphiaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Heather Pederson
    • 1
  • Diana Semmelhack
    • 2
  1. 1.Council for RelationshipsPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Midwestern UniversityDowners GroveUSA