Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Mirroring in Couple and Family Therapy

  • Gihane Jérémie-BrinkEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_318

Introduction

Attachment theorists, such as Kohut and Bowlby, emphasize early caregiving relationships. They suggest that the responsiveness of the caregiver will influence how the child develops into an adult and how that adult develops of a healthy sense of sense and will respond in intimate relationships (Marmarosh and Mann 2014). Mirroring is known as one of the three selfobject transferences evolved from the relationships with the caregiver that Kohut focused on. Kohut theorized that a healthy mirroring selfobject experience, such as being the gleam in a parent’s eye, enables self-esteem, ambitions, and the ability to assert oneself later in life (Marmarosh and Mann 2014). An important aspect of the therapy process is for the therapist to identify the selfobject transferences as they develop, such as awareness of the patient’s unmet selfobject needs. Within the therapy process, the therapist serves multiple selfobject functions, such as being attuned to the ways the client both...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atwood, J. D., & Dobkin, S. (1992). Storm clouds are coming: Ways to help couples reconstruct the crisis of infertility. Contemporary Family Therapy, 14(5), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hill, E. W. (2010). Discovering forgiveness through empathy: Implications for couple and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jakubowski, S. F., Milne, E. P., Brunner, H., & Miller, R. B. (2004). A review of empirically supported marital enrichment programs. Family Relations, 53(5), 528–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Luquet, W. (2006). Short-term couples therapy: The imago model in action (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Marmarosh, C. L., & Mann, S. (2014). Patients’ selfobject needs in psychodynamic psychotherapy: How they relate to client attachment, symptoms, and the therapy alliance. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(3), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Vetere, A. (2001). Structural family therapy. Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 6(3), 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Vetere, A., & Henley, M. (2001). Integrating couples and family therapy into a community alcohol service: A pantheorectical approach. Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Family Institute at Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Eli Karam
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA