Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

First Order Cybernetics

  • Frederick SteierEmail author
  • Jay Lappin
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_274

Name

First Order Cybernetics

Introduction

The history and evolution of the conceptual basis and practice of family therapy relies heavily on principles of cybernetics. At the same time, in truly cybernetic fashion, cybernetics itself owes much to contributions from family therapy. This entry explores this mutual process. Gregory Bateson, whose work embodies the mutual relationship between cybernetics and family therapy, famously stated that “cybernetics is the biggest bite out of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge that mankind has taken in the last 2000 years” – a statement that we return to and build on in our entry. We introduce key principles of cybernetics, including ideas of circularity, nonlinearity, recursion, processes of self-correction and processes of deviation amplification. We concern ourselves with key cybernetic questions, such as how might a system, including a family system, or a therapeutic system, organize itself to maintain stability/homeostasis and balance that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a brain. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Ashby, W. R. (1956). Introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (1942). Social planning and the concept of deutero-learning. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G. (1979a). Mind and nature. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  6. Bateson, G. (1979b). The biosocial integration of behavior in the Schizophrenic family. In N. W. Ackerman, F. L. Beatman, & S. N. Sherman (Eds.), Exploring the base for family therapy. New York: Family Service Association of America.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson, M. C. (2005). The double bind: Pathology and creativity. In F. Steier (Ed.), Gregory Bateson: Essays for an ecology of ideas (pp. 11–21). Exeter: Imprint Academic. (also published as special issue of Cybernetics and Human Knowing, Vol. 12).Google Scholar
  8. Bateson, G., Jackson, D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beer, S. (1972). The brain of the firm. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard, C. (1974). Lectures on the phenomena common to animals and plants (H. E. Hoff, R. Guillemin & L. Guillemin, Trans.). Springfield: Charles C Thomas. ISBN 978-0-398-02857-2 (Wikipedia).
  11. Bowen, M. (1960). A family concept of schizophrenia. In D. Jackson (Ed.), The etiology of schizophrenia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Broderick, C., & Schrader, S. (1991). The history of professional marriage and family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  13. Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: W.W. Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colapinto, J. (1991). Structural family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, R., & Murphy, E. (2016). Hacking project based learning. Cleveland: Times 10 Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Deutsch, K. W. (1963). The nerves of government: Models of political communication and control. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dubos, R. (1978). Health and creative adaptation. Human Nature, 1, 74–82.Google Scholar
  19. Efran, J., Hussong, D., & Levson, S. (2016). Notes for new therapist. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 00(0), 1–11.Google Scholar
  20. Guerin, P. (1976). Family therapy: The first twenty-five years. In P. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy, theory and practice (pp. 2–22). New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gurman, A., & Kniskern, D. (Eds.). (1991). Handbook of family therapy (Vol. II). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  22. Guttman, H. A. (1991). Systems theory, cybernetics, and epistemology. In A. S. Gurman & D. R. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (Vol. II). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  23. Haley, J. (1976). Development of a theory: A history of a research project. In C. E. Sluzki & D. C. Ransom (Eds.), Double bind: The foundation of the communication approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  24. Heims, S. (1991). The cybernetics group. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, L. (1981). Foundations of family therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, D. D. (1957). The question of family homeostasis. Psychiatric Quarterly, 31(Suppl 1), 79–90.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, D. D., & Weakland, J. (1959). Schizophrenic symptoms and family interaction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1, 618–621.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. M. (1996). The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy: Creating connection. Levittown: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, S. (2018). Far sighted: The decisions that matter. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  31. Keeney, B. (1983). Aesthetics of change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  32. Lappin, J. (2014). When every session mattered: The legacy of Braulio Montalvo. Psychotherapy Networker, 38(4), 42–46.Google Scholar
  33. Lappin, J., & Reiter, M. D. (2014). Structural family therapy. In M. D. Reiter (Ed.), Case conceptualization in family therapy. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  34. Lappin, J., & Steier, F. (1996–97). Being there: Learning how to talk the talk. American Family Therapy Academy Newsletter (Special issue on “Larger Systems”), 66, 14–18.Google Scholar
  35. Lombana, J. & Ash, D. (2013). The Reflects Model. Technical report, Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, FLGoogle Scholar
  36. Luepnitz, D. (1988). The family interpreted: Feminist theory in clinical practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: Deviation-amplifying mutual causative processes. American Scientist, 51, 164–179.Google Scholar
  38. Maturana, H. R. (1988). The notions of cybernetics. Continuing the conversation, 12, 7.Google Scholar
  39. Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: ShambalaGoogle Scholar
  40. McGoldrick, M., Pearce, J., & Giordano, J. (Eds.). (1982). Ethnicity and family therapy. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  41. Mead, M. (1968). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In H. von Foerster, J. D. White, L. J. Peterson, & J. K. Russell (Eds.), Purposive systems: Proceedings of the first annual symposium of the American Society for Cybernetics. New York: Spartan Books.Google Scholar
  42. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Minuchin, S & Fishman, H.C. (1989), Family therapy techniques. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. G., Rosman, B., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  45. Montalvo, B. (1986). Family strengths: Obstacles and facilitators. In M. Karpel (Ed.), Family resources: The hidden partner in family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  46. Montalvo, B., & Gutierrez, M. (1983). A perspective for the use of the cultural dimension in family therapy. In J. C. Hansen & C. J. Falicov (Eds.), Cultural dimensions in family therapy. Rockville: Aspen.Google Scholar
  47. Montuori, A. (2005). Gregory Bateson and the promise of transdisciplinarity. In F. Steier (Ed.), Gregory Bateson: Essays for an ecology of ideas (pp. 147–159). Exeter: Imprint Academic. (also published as special issue of Cybernetics and Human Knowing, Vol. 12).Google Scholar
  48. Neill, J., & Kniskern, D. (1982). From psyche to system. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  49. Nichols, M., & Davis, D. (2017). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Hoboken: Pearson.Google Scholar
  50. Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition and learning: A cybernetic theory and methodology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  51. Pias, C. (Ed.) (2003/2016). Cybernetics: The Macy Conferences, 1946–1953: Transactions. Zurich/Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
  52. Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1968). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  54. Russell, B., & Whitehead, A. N. (1910/1912/1913). Principia mathmatica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Satir, V. (1964). Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  56. Selvini-Palazzoli, M. S. (1986). The hidden games of organizations. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  57. Simon, R. (2018). Learning to bear the unbearable: How MDMA works. Psychotherapy Networker, 42(5), 30–31.Google Scholar
  58. Sluzki, C. E., & Ransom, D. C. (Eds.). (1976). Double bind: The foundation of the communication approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  59. Speer, D. C. (1970). Family systems: Morphostasis and morphogenesis, or “Is Homeostasis Enough?”. Family Process, 9(3), 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steier, F. (1988). On cybernetics as reflexive understanding. Continuing the Conversation, 12, 7–8.Google Scholar
  61. Steier, F. (1992). Cybernetics as…Mutualling. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 1(2), 3–10.Google Scholar
  62. Steier, F., & Ostrenko, W. (2000). Taking cybernetics seriously at a science center: Reflection-in-interaction and second order organizational learning. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 7(2–3), 47–69.Google Scholar
  63. Thompson, W. T., Steier, F., & Ostrenko, W. (2014). Communication process in the design of an idea zone at a science center. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(2), 208–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Der Kolk, B. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  65. Whitaker, C. (1982). From psyche to system: The evolving therapy of Carl Whitaker. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  66. Whitaker, C. A., & Malone, T. P. (1953). The roots of psychotherapy. New York: Balkiston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whitaker, C. A., & Malone, T. P. (Eds.). (1958). Psychotherapy of chronic schizophrenic patients. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  68. White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  69. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. New York: Avon.Google Scholar

Audiovisual Media

  1. Psychotherapy.net (Producer). (2011). Salvador Minuchin on family therapy. With Salvador Minuchin, MD and Jay Lappin, LCSW [DVD]. Available from http://www.psychotherapy.net/video/minuchin-family-therapy

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Fielding Graduate UniversitySanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Minuchin Center for the FamilyWoodburyUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • David Kearns
    • 1
  • Bahareh Sahebi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.The Family Institute at Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA