Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

2019 Edition
| Editors: Jay L. Lebow, Anthony L. Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Countertransference in Couples Therapy

  • Florence W. KaslowEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49425-8_2

Introduction

This article explicates various theoretical perspectives in the vast array of couples’ treatment modalities. It presents an historical overview of major schools of thought and highlights the phenomena of transference and countertransference. Several difficult kinds of patient populations where these twin phenomena are apt to occur are discussed illustratively. The intertwined, reciprocal complex dynamics of transference and countertransference are core elements.

“Countertransference” is used to denote the clinician’s reactions to patient transferences which arise unexpectedly from the therapist’s own unresolved feelings towards his or her parents and/or siblings. These emotional responses usually encompass unconscious projections of thoughts and feelings connected to one’s own family members onto clients. Such reactions, triggered in the therapist, are attributable to the fact that how a client acts, looks, expresses his thoughts and emotions, or the information the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ackerman, N. W. (1961). A dynamic from the clinical approach to family confict. In N. W. Ackerman, F. L. Beatman, & S. N. Sherman (Eds.), Exploring the base for family therapy (pp. 52–67). New York: Family Service Association of America.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, N. W. (1958). Psych. dynamics of family life: Diagnosis and treatment of family relationships. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, N. W. (1974). Treating the troubled family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, R., & Van der Heide, N. P. (1997). In M. F. Solomon & J. P. Siegel (Eds.), Rage and agression in couples therapy: An intersubjective approach. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2004). Diagnosis and statistical manual of mental disorder (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  6. Aznar-Martinez, B., Perez-Testor, C., Davins, M., & Aramburee, I. (2016). Couple psychoanalytic psychotherapy as the treatment of choice: Indications, challenges and benefits. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 1(33), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloch, D., & Simon, R. (1982). The strength of family therapy: Selected papers of Nathan W. Ackerman. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  8. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Framo, J. L. (Eds.). (1965, 1985). Intensive family therapy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., Grunebaun, J., & Ulrich, D. (1991). In Gurman, A. S. & Kniskern, D.P. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy. Vol II, pp. 200–238. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  10. Bowen, M. (1988). Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, A., Sichel, J. L., Yaeger, R. J., & DiGuiseppe, R. A. (1989). Rational-emotive couples therapy. Needham: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Erickson, M. H., & Lustig, H. (1976). The primer of Ericksonian psychotherapy. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  13. Goolishian, H. A., & Anderson, H. (1990). Understanding the therapeutic process: From individuals and families to systems in language. In F. Kaslow (Ed.), Voices in family psychology (pp. 91–113). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Kaslow, F. W. (Ed.). (1984). Psychotherapy with psychotherapists. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kaslow, F. W. (2001). Whither countertransference in couples and family treatment: A systemic persective. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 57(8), 1029–1040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaslow, N. J., & Suarez, A. F. (1988). Treating couples in group therapy. In Couples therapy in a family context: Perspective and retrospective (pp. 3–14). Rockvill: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Kaslow, N. J., Kaslow, F. W., & Farber, E. W. (1999). Theories and techniques of marital and family therapy. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 767–793). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirschner, S., Kirschner, D. A., & Rappaport, R. L. (1993). Working with adult incest survivors. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  19. Lachkar, J. (1992). The narcissistic/borderline couple. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  20. Lankton, S. R., Lankton, C. H., & Matthews, W. J. (1991). Ericksonian family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 239–283). New York: Brunner Mazel.Google Scholar
  21. Lazarus, A. (1981). The practice of multimodal therapy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Linehans, M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mendelsohn, R. (2011). Projective indentification and countertransference in borderline couples. Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 375–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Napier, A. Y., & Whitaker, C. A. (1978). The family crucible. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  25. Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Pinsof, W. M. (1995). Integrative problem centered therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Slipp, S. (1988). The technique and practice of object relations family therapy. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  28. Soloman, M. F. (1989). Narcissisn and intimacy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Tansey, M. J., & Burke, W. F. (1989). Understanding countertransference: From projective identification to empathy. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Whitaker, C. A., Felder, R. E., & Warkentin, J. (1965). Countertransference in the family treatment of schizophrenia. In I. Boszormenyi-Nagy & J. L. Framo (Eds.), Intensive family therapy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaslow AssociatesPalm Beach GardensUSA
  2. 2.Florida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Molly F. Gasbarrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Alliant International UniversityLos AngelesUSA