Ecological Aspects of Nuclear Industry

  • A. Gokhman
  • M. Kondria
Living reference work entry


Since the emergence of nuclear energy, discussions on its benefits and harm to humanity have not stopped. On the one hand, the use of nuclear power plants solves the problem of the greenhouse effect that has occurred in recent centuries due to the intense combustion of carbon fuels (peat, coal, natural gas, oil, etc.), and resulting in a marked increase in the average temperature of the Earth. On the other hand, the problem arises because the expensive procedures for the disposal and disposal of radioactive wastes with a long half-life period. Moreover, three serious accidents of nuclear power plants that have been taking place during the existence of nuclear power for more than sixty years, as well as a very large number of contingencies led to serious consequences for the atomic phobia of humanity. The proposed article informs the world public about the ecological aspects of nuclear energy objectively, drawing readers’ attention to both its negative and positive impact on the environment.


Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) ofNuclear Power Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) International Commission On Radiation Protection (ICRP) Light Water Breeder Reactor (LWBR) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    BP Statistical Review of World Energy, London, June 2015Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BP Technology Outlook, London, November 2015Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEA – Key world energy statistics, 2015, Retrieved 6 Apr 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riski vozdeystviya atmosfernyih vyibrosov elektrostantsiy na zdorove naseleniya //Teploenergetika. – 2009. – # 1. – M., 2009. pp 71–76Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desbrosses N. World energy expenditures, leonardo energy, 28 Nov 2011. Accessed 30 Jan 2015Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Key World Energy Statistics (PDF). IEA. 28 May 2017. p 38Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Statistics Search IEA. 2012. pp 6, 24Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Electricity – installed generating capacity, 2014. Retrieved 6 Apr 2017Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakićenović N, Grübler A, McDonald A (1998) Global energy: perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York. ISBN 0521642000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma D. China’s coming decade of natural gas. Asia’s uncertain LNG future, NBR special report. November 2013. Retrieved 8 Aug 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Key statistics 2012, 2010 and 2006 IEAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    The true cost of coal 27 Nov 2008, pp 66–69Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Key statistics 2012 IEAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Makdonald A (2008) Yadernaya energetika: polozhenie del v mire. Vzglyad na proizvodstvo elektroenergii na AES vo vsem mire i ego buduschie perspektivyi. Byull. MAGATE 49-2. p 45Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved 23 July 2016Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    World nuclear power reactors & uranium requirements. World Nuclear Association. 1 Oct 2010. Retrieved 23 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    China nuclear power – Chinese nuclear energyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    WNA (2013). Nuclear power down in 2012Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Nuclear News. The nuclear renaissanceGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Japan/Nuclear Power in Japan, World Nuclear Association. 27 Jan 2015Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    2015 key world energy statistics (PDF). IEA. 2016. p 18. World electricity generation by fuels in 2015; from the international Energy Agency report key world energy statistic, 2016 editionGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Emerging nuclear energy countries. World Nuclear Association. 2013. Retrieved 14 Apr 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Golubeva AA, Tselischeva MD, Tregubchenko AV (2013) Ekologicheskie problemyi AES Obscherossiyskaya zaochnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya studentov OU SPO, NPO i VPO. Tezisyi dokladov, g. Samara, pp 84–85Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tselischeva MD, Serebrov GS OTsENKA EKOLOGIChESKIH PROBLEM AES // Nauchnoe soobschestvo studentov XXI stoletiya. TEHNIChESKIE NAUKI: sb. st. po mat. XIV mezhdunar. stud. nauch.-prakt. konf.№ 14Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Basov VI, Doronin MS, Ipatov PL, Kashtanov VV, Larin EA, Severinov VV, HrustalYov VA, Chebotarevskiy YV (2005) Regionalnaya effektivnost proektov AES/Pod M.: Energoatomizdat. pp 195–196. 228. ISBN 5 283 00796 0Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bekman IN Yadernaya industriya: Kurs lektsiy/Predotvraschenie zagryazneniya okruzhayuschey sredyi vyibrosami AES. – M.: Himichesskiy fakultet MGU. pp 2–4. 26 sGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Makhijani A (1998) Health and environmental effects of nuclear weapons production and other aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle. NGO presentation to the 1998 Non-Proliferation Treaty PrepComGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Flowers В (1976) Nuclear energy and the environment, royal commission on environmental pollution, Rep. no. 6. H.M.S.O., LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stewart A (2000) The role of epidemiology in the detection of harmful effect of radiation. Environ Health Perspect 108(2):93–96MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robbins A, Makhijani A, Yih K (1991) Radioactive Heaven and Earth. The health and environmental effects of nuclear weaponns testings in, on, and above the Earth. The Apex Press, New York, XIII+193 pGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    NP 017 – 2000. Osnovnyie trebovaniya k prodleniyu sroka ekspluatatsii bloka atomnoy stantsii. Utverzhdenyi Postanovleniem # 4 Gosatomnadzora Rossii ot 18 sentyabrya 2000 gGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Report on Nuclear and Radiation Safety in Ukraine 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Gokhman
    • 1
  • M. Kondria
    • 1
  1. 1.South Ukraininan National Pedagogical UniversityOdessaUkraine

Personalised recommendations