Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Dead Reckoning

  • Jason N. Bruck
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_872-1

Dead Reckoning: An animal’s inability to see, smell, echolocate, or feel its way around an environment does not necessarily preclude successful navigation. Instead an animal may use a mechanism called dead reckoning to navigate. A navigator’s phrase, dead reckoning, is also synonymous with path integration, meaning the organism uses cumulative information about its distance and direction to find a way back to the origin of the journey (Shettleworth 2010). Dead reckoning, as described by Gallistel (1990) is defined as an egocentric mode of navigation (see Egocentric Frame) that is based on the individual localizing with respect to itself. Egocentric navigation explains how a human can move around an unfamiliar darkened room with some limited success, capable of returning to a starting point after fumbling around the space for a few minutes. In these instances, an organism may use self-referential vestibular cues (Etienne et al. 1986), sensory input from leg mechanoreceptors (Seyfarth...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Benhamou, S. (1997). On systems of reference involved in spatial memory. Behavioural Processes, 40, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruck, J. N., Allen, N. A., Brass, K. E., Horn, B. A., & Campbell, P. (2017). Species differences in egocentric navigation: The effect of burrowing ecology on a spatial cognitive trait in mice. Animal Behaviour, 127, 67–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, B. J., & Taube, J. S. (2009). Deficits in landmark navigation and path integration after lesions of the interpeduncular nucleus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 123(3), 490–503.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015477.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dudchenko, P. A., & Bruce, C. (2005). Navigation without landmarks: Can rats use a sense of direction to return to a home site? Connection Science, 17, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyer, F. C. (1996). Spatial memory and navigation by honey bees on the scale of the foraging range. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 147–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eilam, D., Dank, M., & Maurer, R. (2003). Voles scale locomotion to the size of the open-field by adjusting the distance between stops: A possible link to path integration. Behavioural Brain Research, 141, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R., Saucy, F., & Teroni, E. (1986). Short-distance homing in the golden hamster after a passive outward journey. Animal Behavior, 39, 696–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Georgakopoulos, J., & Etienne, A. S. (1994). Identifying location by dead reckoning and external cues. Behavioural Processes, 31, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mittelstaedt, H., & Mittelstaedt, M. L. (1982). Homing by path integration. In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.), Avian navigation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Saint Paul, U. V. (1982). Do geese use path integration for walking home? In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.), Avian navigation (pp. 298–307). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Seyfarth, E. A., & Barth, F. G. (1972). Compound slit sense organs on the spider leg: Mechanoreceptors involved in kinesthetic orientation. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 78(2), 176–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shettleworth, S. (2010). Cognition, evolution and behavior (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Shettleworth, S., & Sutton, J. E. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial learning: Dead reckoning and beacon homing in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 125–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutton, J. E., & Shettleworth, S. (2005). Internal sense of direction and landmark use in pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ugolini, A. (1987). Visual displacement acquired during displacement and initial orientation in Polistes gallicus (L.) (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Animal Behaviour, 35, 590–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Watson, J. B. (1907). Kinaesthetic and organic sensations: Their role in the reaction of the white rat to the maze. Psychological Review, 8, i-101 (Monogram).Google Scholar
  18. Wehner, R. (2003). Desert ant navigation: How miniature brains solve complex tasks. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 189(8), 579–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wehner, R., & Srinivasan, M. V. (1981). Searching behavior of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenopetera). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 142, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Lauren Guillette
    • 1
  1. 1.University of St. AndrewsSt. AndrewsUK