Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Defensive Burying

  • Mercedes McWatersEmail author
  • Leslie Matuszewich
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_690-1

Synonyms

Definition

The defensive burying test is used by researchers to measure an animal’s naturally occurring anxiety-like behaviors toward an aversive stimulus.

When an animal encounters a potentially threatening stimulus, the animal engages in a variety of behaviors to distance themselves from or reduce the risk of interacting with the noxious stimulus. A common behavior that rodents exhibit to reduce the threat of a potentially harmful stimulus is to bury the stimulus; this behavior is referred to as defensive burying. Rodents display this behavior in their natural environments, using their forepaws and heads to shovel available materials (e.g., leaves, bedding) onto or near the noxious object. Scientists have simulated this ethological behavior in the laboratory by exposing the animal to a noxious stimulus and measuring subsequent behaviors. The defensive burying test provides...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Charney, D. S., Heninger, G. R., & Redmond, D. E. (1983). Yohimbine induced anxiety and increased noradrenergic function in humans: Effects of diazepam and clonidine. Life Sciences, 33, 19–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. De Boer, S. F., & Koolhaas, J. M. (2003). Defensive burying in rodents: Ethology, neurobiology and psychopharmacology. European Journal of Pharmacology, 463, 145–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hudson, B. B. (1950). One-trial learning in the domestic rat. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 41, 99–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hughes, J. W., Watkins, L., Blumenthal, J. A., Kuhn, C., & Sherwood, A. (2004). Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to increased 24-hour urinary norepinephrine excretion among healthy middle-aged women. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 353–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Korte, S. M., Bouws, G. A. H., Koolhaas, J. M., & Bohus, B. (1992). Neuroendocrine and behavioral responses during conditioned active and passive behavior in the defensive burying/probe avoidance paradigm: Effects of ipsapirone. Physiology & Behavior, 52, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pinel, J. P. J., & Treit, D. (1978). Burying as a defensive response in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 708–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sgoifo, A., De Boer, S. F., Haller, J., & Koolhaas, J. M. (1996). Individual differences in plasma catecholamine and corticosterone stress responses of wild-type rats: Relationship with aggression. Physiology & Behavior, 60, 1403–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Treit, D. (1990). A comparison of anxiolytic and nonanxiolytic agents in the shock-probe/burying test for anxiolytics. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 36, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsuda, A., Ida, Y., & Tanaka, M. (1988). The contrasting effects of diazepam and yohimbine on conditioned defensive burying in rats. Psychobiology, 16, 213–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Caroline Leuchtenberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Institute FarroupilhaPanambiBrasil