Introduction
In the neurosciences, animal models play a central role for experimentally investigating neurobehavioral (dys)functions and their underlying (patho)physiological mechanisms and processes. Almost always, when using animal models, one implicitly assumes that they simulate these mechanisms and processes in humans or a species other than the one investigated. These animal models thus focus on the homology/analogy of the behavior and underlying substrates with the final aim to learn about these behaviors and substrates in the species to be modeled. When developing a model or when selecting the most appropriate animal model for a research project, the most important selection criterion is its validity. Validity is the extent to which an animal model’s underlying substrates and mechanisms, measurements, and the conclusions drawn from these measurements are well-grounded and represent the real world accurately.
The basic classes of validity, i.e., internal and external validity...
References
Atanasova, N. A. (2015). Validating animal models. Theoria, 30(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.12761.
Belzung, C. (2014). Innovative drugs to treat depression: Did animal models fail to be predictive or did clinical trials fail to detect effects? Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 39(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.342.
Belzung, C., & Lemoine, M. (2011). Criteria of validity for animal models of psychiatric disorders: Focus on anxiety disorders and depression. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, 1(9), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-5380-1-9.
Burrows, E. L., McOmish, C. E., & Hannan, A. J. (2011). Gene–environment interactions and construct validity in preclinical models of psychiatric disorders. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 35(6), 1376–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.12.011.
Cachat, J., Stewart, A., Utterback, E., Hart, P., Gaikwad, S., Wong, K., … Kalueff, A. V. (2011). Three-dimensional neurophenotyping of adult zebrafish behavior. PLoS One 6(3), e17597, 14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017597.
Crabbe, J. C., & Morris, R. G. M. (2004). Festina lente: Late-night thoughts on high-throughput screening of mouse behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7(11), 1175–1179. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1343.
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014). The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20087.
Degeling, C., & Johnson, J. (2013). Evaluating animal models: Some taxonomic worries. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht004.
Denayer, T., Stöhr, T., & van Roy, M. (2014). Animal models in translational medicine: Validation and prediction. New Horizons in Translational Medicine, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhtm.2014.08.001.
Ferreira, G. S., Veening-Griffioen, D. H., Boon, W. P. C., Moors, E. H. M., Gispen-de Wied, C. C., Schellekens, H., & van Meer, P. J. K. (2019). A standardised framework to identify optimal animal models for efficacy assessment in drug development. PLoS One, 14(6), e0218014, 17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218014.
Gamzu, E. (1985). Animal behavioral models in the discovery of compounds to treat memory dysfunction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 444, 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb37602.x.
Gould, T. D., & Gottesman, I. I. (2006). Psychiatric endophenotypes and the development of valid animal models. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00186.x.
Gouveia, A., Jr., & de Brito, T. M. (2015). Animal models of psychopathology and its relation to clinical practice. In P. A. Gargiulo & H. L. M. Arroyo (Eds.), Psychiatry and neuroscience update. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17103-6_22.
Greek, R., & Rice, M. J. (2012). Animal models and conserved processes. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 9, 40, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-9-40.
Guala, F. (2003). Experimental localism and external validity. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/377400.
Hoffman, K. L. (2016). New dimensions in the use of rodent behavioral tests for novel drug discovery and development. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 11(4), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2016.1153624.
Kas, M. J. H., Fernandes, C., Schalkwyk, L. C., & Collier, D. A. (2007). Genetics of behavioural domains across the neuropsychiatric spectrum; of mice and men. Molecular Psychiatry, 12, 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001979.
Kas, M. J. H., Gelegen, C., Schalkwyk, L. C., & Collier, D. A. (2009). Interspecies comparisons of functional genetic variations and their implications in neuropsychiatry. American Journal of Medical Genetics – Part B, 150B, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30815.
Kas, M. J. H., Krishnan, V., Gould, T. D., Collier, D. A., Olivier, B., Lesch, K.-P., et al. (2011). Advances in multidisciplinary and cross-species approaches to examine the neurobiology of psychiatric disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21, 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.12.001.
LaPorte, J. L., Ren-Patterson, R. F., Murphy, D. L., & Kalueff, A. V. (2008). Refining psychiatric genetics: From ‘mouse psychiatry’ to understanding complex human disorders. Behavioural Pharmacology, 19, 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0b013e32830dc09b.
Maximino, C., & van der Staay, F. J. (2019). Behavioral models in psychopathology: Epistemic and semantic considerations. Behavioral and Brain Functions 15, 1, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12993-019-0152-4.
Maximino, C., Marques de Brito, T., & Gouveia, A., Jr. (2010). Construct validity of behavioral models of anxiety: Where experimental psychopathology meets ecology and evolution. Psychology & Neuroscience, 3(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2010.1.015.
Maximino, C., da Silva, A. W. B., Araújo, J., Gomes Lima, M., Miranda, V., Puty, B., … Herculano, A. M. (2014). Fingerprinting of psychoactive drugs in zebrafish anxiety-like behaviors. PLoS One 9(7), e103943, 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103943.
McKinney, W. T., Jr., & Bunney, W. E., Jr. (1969). Animal model of depression, I. Review of evidence: Implications for research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-023725-1.50013-6.
McNaughton, N., & Zangrossi, H., Jr. (2008). Theoretical approaches to the modeling of anxiety in animals. In R. J. Blanchard, D. C. Blanchard, G. Griebel, & D. Nutt (Eds.), Handbook of anxiety and fear (Vol. 17, pp. 11–27). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-7339(07)00002-1.
McOmish, C. E., Burrows, E. L., & Hannan, A. J. (2014). Identifying novel interventional strategies for psychiatric disorders: Integrating genomics, ‘enviromics’ and gene–environment interactions in valid preclinical models. British Journal of Pharmacology, 171, 4719–4728. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12783.
Stewart, A. M., & Kalueff, A. V. (2015). Developing better and more valid animal models of brain disorders. Behavioural Brain Research, 276, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.024.
Stewart, A. M., Nguyen, M., Poudel, M. K., Warnick, J. E., Echevarria, D. J., Beaton, E. A., et al. (2015). The failure of anxiolytic therapies in early clinical trials: What needs to be done. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 24(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2015.1019063.
van der Staay, F. J. (2006). Animal models of behavioral dysfunctions: Basic concepts and classifications, and an evaluation strategy. Brain Research Reviews, 52(1), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.01.006.
van der Staay, F. J., Arndt, S. S., & Nordquist, R. E. (2009). Evaluation of animal models of neurobehavioral disorders. Behavioral and Brain Functions 5, 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-11.
van der Staay, F. J., Arndt, S. S., & Nordquist, R. E. (2014). Developing mouse models of neurobehavioral disorders: When is a model a good model? In S. Pietropaolo, F. Sluyter, & W. E. Crusio (Eds.), Behavioral genetics of the mouse (pp. 3–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/CBO9781107360556.
Willner, P. (1984). The validity of animal models of depression. Psychopharmacology, 83, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427414.
Willner, P. (1986). Validation criteria for animal models of human mental disorders: Learned helplessness as a paradigm case. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 10, 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-5846(86)90051-5.
Willner, P. (1991). In P. Willner (Ed.), Behavioural models in psychopharmacology (pp. 3–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, C. D. (2002). Animal models of depression in neuropsychopharmacology qua Feyerabend philosophy of science. In S. P. Shodov (Ed.), Advances in psychologyy research (Vol. 13, pp. 129–148). New York: NovaScience Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Maximino, C., Arndt, S.S., van der Staay, F.J. (2019). Animal Models. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_2059-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_2059-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences