Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Reputation

  • Yvan I. RussellEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1884-2

Synonyms

Introduction

Reputation is based on two things: behavior plus an audience. In its most basic definition, “reputation” is an information source (Russell 2016). Any episode of animal behavior is a potential signal to another animal (Danchin et al. 2004), even if that signal was not a deliberate intention to communicate.

Consider the example of territorial urine marking in mice. When a mouse urinates in your house, that urine deposit is a meaningful signal for other mice (Hurst 2005). In many animals, scent marks have an important role in social communication, allowing “recognition of group members and kin, the advertisement of territory ownership and social dominance, assessment of the quality of competitors and potential mates, and the advertisement and control of reproductive status” (Hurst 2005, p. 220). After a mouse deposits urine, the scent stays behind in the absence of the signaler, detectable by other mice passing near....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abdai, J., & Miklósi, Á. (2016). The origin of social evaluation, social eavesdropping, reputation formation, image scoring, or what you will. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, E. S. (2001). Threat displays in animal communication: Handicaps, reputations, and commitments. In R. M. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 99–119). New York: Russell Sage Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R., Kuroshima, H., Takimoto, A., & Fujita, K. (2013a). Third-party social evaluation of humans by monkeys. Nature Communications, 4, 1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R., Takimoto, A., Kuroshima, H., & Fujita, K. (2013b). Capuchin monkeys judge third-party reciprocity. Cognition, 127, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. R., Bucher, B., Chijiiwa, H., Kuroshima, H., Takimoto, A., & Fujita, K. (2017). Third-party social evaluations of humans by monkeys and dogs. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aureli, F., Cozzolino, R., Cordischi, C., & Scucchi, S. (1992). Kin-oriented redirection among Japanese macaques: An expression of a revenge system? Animal Behaviour, 44, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binmore, K. (2007). Playing for real: A text on game theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2012). Fairness in animals: Where to from here? Social Justice Research, 25, 336–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chijiiwa, H., Kuroshima, H., Hori, Y., Anderson, J. R., & Fujita, K. (2015). Dogs avoid people who behave negatively to their owner: Third-party affective evaluation. Animal Behaviour, 106, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danchin, É., Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T. J., & Wagner, R. H. (2004). Public information: From nosy neighbours to cultural evolution. Science, 305, 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitch, T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haviland, J. B. (1977). Gossip, reputation, and knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Herrmann, E., Keupp, S., Hare, B., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Direct and indirect reputation formation in nonhuman great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heyes, C. M. (1994). Social learning in animals: Categories and mechanisms. Biological Reviews, 69, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirata, S., & Morimura, N. (2000). Naive chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) observation of experienced conspecifics in a tool-using task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurst, J. L. (2005). Scent marking and social communication. In P. K. Mcgregor (Ed.), Animal communication networks (pp. 219–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. McGregor, P. K. (1993). Signalling in territorial systems: A context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 340, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mennill, D. J., & Ratcliffe, L. M. (2004). Do male black-capped chickadees eavesdrop on song contests? A multi-speaker playback experiment. Behaviour, 141, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milinski, M. (2016). Reputation: A universal currency for human social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morris, C. W. (1999). What is this thing called “reputation”?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ophir, A. G., & Galef, B. G., Jr. (2003). Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners. Animal Behaviour, 66, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollock, G., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1992). Reciprocity and the emergence of reputation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 159, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. Philosophical Review, 67, 164–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Russell, Y. I. (2016). Reciprocity and reputation: A review of direct and indirect information gathering. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 37, 247–270.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, Y. I., Call, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Image scoring in great apes. Behavioural Processes, 78, 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tennie, C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Rhijn, J. G., & Vodegel, R. (1980). Being honest about one’s intentions: An evolutionary stable strategy for animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 85, 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Zanna Clay
    • 1
  1. 1.Durham UniversityDurhamUK