Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Tool Use

  • Camilla CenniEmail author
  • Jean-Baptiste Leca
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1541-1

Synonyms

Introduction

Tools and other utilitarian artifacts pervade humans’ lives. They have played such a pivotal role in theories of human evolution that tool use has traditionally been considered a behavioral indicator of complex and flexible cognition. While this early promise has long triggered and maintained keen scientific interest for the study of tool use in nonhuman animals, it may also have revived some naïve anthropomorphic and even anthropocentric biases, particularly when studying species that are evolutionarily close to humans. It is noteworthy that not all cases of tool use necessarily imply high levels of cognitive sophistication, and we should not automatically attribute some of our psychological characteristics to other tool-using species, just because tools are part of our human identity. In fact, tool use is a broad functional category of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bernstein, N. A. (1996). Dexterity and its development. London, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Birch, H. G. (1945). The relation of previous experience to insightful problem-solving. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 38, 367–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesch, C. (2003). Is culture a golden barrier between human and chimpanzee? Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boesch, C. (2013). Ecology and cognition of tool use in chimpanzees. In C. Sanz, J. Call, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology (pp. 21–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Call, J. (2013). Three ingredients for becoming a creative tool user. In C. Sanz, J. Call, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Resende, B. D., Ottoni, E. B., & Fragaszy, D. M. (2008). Ontogeny of manipulative behavior and nutcracking in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): A perception–action perspective. Developmental Science, 11, 828–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ebel, S. J., & Call, J. (2018). The interplay of prior experience and motivation in great ape problem-solving (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, and Pongo abelii). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 132, 294–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2009). Tool use and physical cognition in birds and mammals. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox, E. A., Sitompul, A. F., & van Schaik, C. P. (1999). Intelligent tool use in wild Sumatran orangutans. In S. T. Parker, R. W. Mitchell, & H. L. Miles (Eds.), The mentality of gorillas and orangutans (pp. 99–116). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, E. A., van Schaik, C. P., Sitompul, A., & Wright, D. N. (2004). Intra-and interpopulational differences in orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) activity and diet: Implications for the invention of tool use. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 125, 162–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fragaszy, D. M., & Mangalam, M. (2018). Tooling. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 50, 177–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E., & Fedigan, L. M. (2004). The complete capuchin: The biology of the genus Cebus. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haidle, M. N. (2010). Working-memory capacity and the evolution of modern cognitive potential. Current Anthropology, 51, S149–S166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heldstab, S. A., Kosonen, Z. K., Koski, S. E., Burkart, J. M., van Schaik, C. P., & Isler, K. (2016). Manipulation complexity in primates coevolved with brain size and terrestriality. Scientific Reports, 6, 24528.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hihara, S., Notoya, T., Tanaka, M., Ichinose, S., Ojima, H., Obayashi, S., … Iriki, A. (2006). Extension of corticocortical afferents into the anterior bank of the intraparietal sulcus by tool-use training in adult monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2636–2646.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Humle, T., Snowdon, C. T., & Matsuzawa, T. (2009). Social influences on ant-dipping acquisition in the wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. Animal Cognition, 12, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt, G. R., Gray, R. D., & Taylor, A. H. (2013). Why is tool use rare in animals? In C. Sanz, J. Call, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology (pp. 89–118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahrs, B. A., Jung, W. P., & Lockman, J. J. (2012). What is the role of infant banging in the development of tool use? Experimental Brain Research, 218, 315–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kappeler, P., & Kraus, C. (2010). Levels and mechanisms of behavioral variability. In P. Kappeler (Ed.), Animal behavior: Evolution and mechanisms (pp. 655–684). Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kenward, B., Rutz, C., Weir, A. A., & Kacelnik, A. (2006). Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: Inherited action patterns and social influences. Animal Behaviour, 72, 1329–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koops, K., Furuichi, T., & Hashimoto, C. (2015). Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use. Scientific Reports, 5, 11356.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lamon, N., Neumann, C., & Zuberbühler, K. (2018). Development of object manipulation in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 135, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leca, J.-B., Nahallage, C. A., Gunst, N., & Huffman, M. A. (2008). Stone-throwing by Japanese macaques: Form and functional aspects of a group-specific behavioral tradition. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 989–998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lefebvre, L., Boire, D., & Nicolakakis, N. (2002). Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour, 139, 939–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lockman, J. J. (2000). A perception–action perspective on tool use development. Child Development, 71, 137–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lonsdorf, E. V. (2006). What is the role of mothers in the acquisition of termite-fishing behaviors in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii)? Animal Cognition, 9, 36–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin-Ordas, G., Call, J., & Colmenares, F. (2008). Tubes, tables and traps: Great apes solve two functional equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks. Animal Cognition, 11, 423–430.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthews, L. J., Paukner, A., & Suomi, S. J. (2010). Can traditions emerge from the interaction of stimulus enhancement and reinforcement learning? An experimental model. American Anthropologist, 112, 257–269.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Osiurak, F., Jarry, C., & Le Gall, D. (2010). Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: Toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychological Review, 117, 517–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmer, C. F. (1989). The discriminating nature of infants’ exploratory actions. Developmental Psychology, 25, 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parker, S. T., & Gibson, K. R. (1977). Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in Cebus monkeys and great apes. Journal of Human Evolution, 6, 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (1998). The structure-function interface in the analysis of play fighting. In M. Bekoff & J. A. Byers (Eds.), Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative and ecological perspectives (pp. 115–140). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pellis, S. M., Pellis, V. C., Pelletier, A., & Leca, J.-B. (2019). Is play a behavior system, and, if so, what kind? Behavioural Processes, 160, 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 4436–4441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Root-Bernstein, M., Narayan, T., Cornier, L., & Bourgeois, A. (2019). Context-specific tool use by Sus cebifrons. Mammalian Biology, 98, 102–110.Google Scholar
  38. Sanz, C. M., & Morgan, D. B. (2013). The social context of chimpanzee tool use. In C. Sanz, J. Call, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology (pp. 161–175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shumaker, R. W., Walkup, K. R., & Beck, B. B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  40. Spagnoletti, N., Visalberghi, E., Ottoni, E., Izar, P., & Fragaszy, D. (2011). Stone tool use by adult wild bearded capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus). Frequency, efficiency and tool selectivity. Journal of Human Evolution, 61, 97–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. St Amant, R., & Horton, T. E. (2008). Revisiting the definition of animal tool use. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1199–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tan, A. W. (2017). From play to proficiency: The ontogeny of stone-tool use in coastal-foraging long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) from a comparative perception-action perspective. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 131, 89–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thierry, B., Anderson, J. R., Demaria, C., Desportes, C., & Petit, O. (1994). Tonkean macaque behavior from the perspective of the evolution of Sulawesi macaques. In J. J. Roeder, B. Thierry, J. R. Anderson, & N. Herrenschmidt (Eds.), Current primatology (Social development, learning and behavior, Vol. II, pp. 103–117). Strasbourg: Université Louis Pasteur.Google Scholar
  44. Torigoe, T. (1985). Comparison of object manipulation among 74 species of non-human primates. Primates, 26, 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., Singleton, I., … Merrill, M. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299, 102–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yamakoshi, G. (1998). Dietary responses to fruit scarcity of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea: Possible implications for ecological importance of tool use. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 106, 283–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dawson Clary
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada