Computational Methods for the Predictive Design of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

  • Stefan ScheinerEmail author
  • Vladimir S. Komlev
  • Christian Hellmich
Reference work entry
Part of the Reference Series in Biomedical Engineering book series (RSBE)


The design of bone tissue engineering materials and scaffold structures made thereof is a delicate task, owing to the various, sometimes contradicting requirements that must be fulfilled. The traditional approach is based on a trial-and-error strategy, which may result in a lengthy and inefficient process. Aiming at improvement of this unsatisfactory situation, computer simulations, based on sound mathematical modeling of the involved processes, have been identified as promising complement to experimental testing. After giving a brief overview of available modeling and simulation concepts, the core of this chapter is presented, namely recent examples of multiscale, continuum micromechanics-based homogenization approaches developed in relation to bone tissue engineering. First, the fundamentals of continuum micromechanics are introduced, in order to lay the groundwork for the subsequently elaborated stiffness and strength homogenization approach related to a hydroxyapatite-based granular bone tissue engineering material. For the latter, the derivation of an upscaling scheme allowing for estimating the macroscopic stiffness and the macroscopic strength is demonstrated. Finally, avenues to utilization of this method in the design process of such materials are pointed out.


Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold Continuum Micromechanics Hydroxyapatite-based Biomaterials Multi-scale Modeling Homogeneous Stiffness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



In the context of the research presented in Sect. 3.3 of this chapter, the partial financial support by the European Research Council (ERC), in the framework of the project Multiscale poromicromechanics of bone materials, with links to biology and medicine (project number FP7-257023), as well as the partial financial support by the Russian Science Foundation (grant number 15-13-00108), are gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, COST-action MP1005, NAMABIO – From nano to macro biomaterials (design, processing, characterization, modeling) and applications to stem cells regenerative orthopedic and dental medicine has provided means for a sustainable collaboration over several years.


  1. Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, Hojo M, Hollister SJ (2006) Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27(21):3964–3972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akao M, Aoki H, Kato K (1981) Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite for prosthetic applications. J Mater Sci 16(3):809–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP (2012) Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40(5):363–408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand E, Hellmich C (2009) Multiscale elasticity of tissue engineering scaffolds with tissue-engineered bone: a continuum micromechanics approach. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 135(5):395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 30(10):546–554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12):496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botchwey EA, Pollack SR, Levine EM, Johnston ED, Laurencin CT (2004) Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional fluid flow in rotating bioreactors for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 69A(2):205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budianksy B, O’Connell RJ (1976) Elastic moduli of a cracked solid. Int J Solids Struct 12(2):81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung CA, Chen CW, Chen CP, Tseng CS (2007) Enhancement of cell growth in tissue-engineering constructs under direct perfusion: modeling and simulation. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(6):1603–1616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Czenek A, Blanchard R, Dejaco A, Sigurjónsson ÓE, Örlygsson G, Gargiulo P, Hellmich C (2014) Quantitative intravoxel analysis of microct-scanned resorbing ceramic biomaterials – perspectives for computer-aided biomaterial design. J Mater Res 29(23):2757–2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dejaco A, Komlev VS, Jaroszewicz J, Swieszkowski W, Hellmich C (2012) Micro CT-based multiscale elasticity of double-porous (pre-cracked) hydroxyapatite granules for regenerative medicine. J Biomech 45(6):1068–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Deudé V, Dormieux L, Kondo D, Maghous S (2002) Micromechanical approach to nonlinear poroelasticity: application to cracked rocks. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 128(8):848–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dias MR, Fernandes PR, Guedes JM, Hollister SJ (2012) Permeability analysis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 45(6):938–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dormieux L, Lemarchand E, Kondo D, Fairbairn E (2004) Elements of poromicromechanics applied to concrete. Mater Struct/Concr Sci Eng 37(265):31–42Google Scholar
  15. Dormieux L, Kondo D, Ulm F-J (2006) Microporomechanics. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drugan WR, Willis JR (1996) A micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites. J Mech Phys Solids 44(4):497–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. Bone Joint J 69-B(1):45–55Google Scholar
  18. Fritsch A, Hellmich C (2007) ‘Universal’ microstructural patterns in cortical and trabecular, extracellular and extravascular bone materials: micromechanics-based prediction of anisotropic elasticity. J Theor Biol 244(4):597–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritsch A, Dormieux L, Hellmich C (2006) Porous polycrystals built up by uniformly and axisymmetrically oriented needles: homogenization of elastic properties. C R Méc 334(3):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritsch A, Dormieux L, Hellmich C, Sanahuja J (2007) Micromechanics of crystal interfaces in polycrystalline solid phases of porous media: fundamentals and application to strength of hydroxyapatite biomaterials. J Mater Sci 42(21):8824–8837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fritsch A, Dormieux L, Hellmich C, Sanahuja J (2009a) Mechanical behavior of hydroxyapatite biomaterials: an experimentally validated micromechanical model for elasticity and strength. J Biomed Mater Res – Part A 88A(1):149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fritsch A, Hellmich C, Dormieux L (2009b) Ductile sliding between mineral crystals followed by rupture of collagen crosslinks: experimentally supported micromechanical explanation of bone strength. J Theor Biol 260(2):230–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fritsch A, Hellmich C, Dormieux L (2010) The role of disc-type crystal shape for micromechanical predictions of elasticity and strength of hydroxyapatite biomaterials. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 368:1913–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritsch A, Hellmich C, Young P (2013) Micromechanics-derived scaling relations for poroelasticity and strength of brittle porous polycrystals. J Appl Mech (ASME) 80(2):020905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geris L (2013) Computational modeling in tissue engineering, Studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials, vol 10. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilmore RS, Katz JL (1982) Elastic properties of apatites. J Mater Sci 17(4):1131–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hellmich C, Ulm F-J (2002) Micromechanical model for ultra-structural stiffness of mineralized tissues. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 128(8):898–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hellmich C, Ulm F-J, Dormieux L (2004) Can the diverse elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone be attributed to only a few tissue-independent phase properties and their interactions? - arguments from a multiscale approach. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2(4):219–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hervé E, Zaoui A (1993) n-Layered inclusion-based micromechanical modelling. Int J Eng Sci 31(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill R (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids 11(5):357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4(7):518–524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24):2529–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutmacher DW, Singh H (2008) Computational fluid dynamics for improved bioreactor design and 3D culture. Trends Biotechnol 26(4):166–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacobs CR, Temiyasathit S, Castillo AB (2010) Osteocyte mechanobiology and pericellular mechanics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:369–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaecques SVN, Van Oosterwyck H, Muraru L, Van Cleynenbreugel T, De Smet E, Wevers M, Naert I, Vander Sloten J (2004) Individualised, micro CT-based finite element modelling as a tool for biomechanical analysis related to tissue engineering of bone. Biomaterials 25(9):1683–1696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Katz JL, Ukraincik K (1971) On the anisotropic elastic properties of bone. Calcif Tissue Int 4(3):221–227Google Scholar
  37. Kohlhauser C, Hellmich C (2013) Ultrasonic contact pulse transmission for elastic wave velocity and stiffness determination: influence of specimen geometry and porosity. Eng Struct 47:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Komlev VS, Barinov SM, Koplik EV (2002) A method to fabricate porous spherical hydroxyapatite granules intended for time-controlled drug release. Biomaterials 23(16):3449–3454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Komlev VS, Barinov SM, Girardin E, Oscarsson S, Rosengren A, Rustichelli F, Orlovskii VP (2003) Porous spherical hydroxyapatite and fluorhydroxyapatite granules: processing and characterization. Sci Technol Adv Mater 4(6):503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lacroix D, Chateau A, Ginebra M-P, Planell JA (2006) Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 27(30):5326–5334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lacroix D, Planell JA, Prendergast PJ (2009) Computer-aided design and finiteelement modelling of biomaterial scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 367(1895):1993–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Langer R, Tirrell DA (2004) Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428(6982):487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li X, Wang L, Fan Y, Feng Q, Cui F-Z, Watari F (2013) Nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 101A(8):2424–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luczynski K, Dejaco A, Lahayne O, Jaroszewicz J, Swieszkowski W, Hellmich C (2012) MicroCT/micromechanics-based finite element models and quasi-static unloading tests deliver consistent values for Young’s modulus of rapid-prototyped polymer-ceramic tissue engineering scaffold. CMES – Comput Model Eng Sci 87(6):505–529Google Scholar
  45. Melchels FPW, Bertoldi K, Gabbrielli R, Velders AH, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) Mathematically defined tissue engineering scaffold architectures prepared by stereolithography. Biomaterials 31(27):6909–6916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Milan J-L, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2009) Computational modelling of the mechanical environment of osteogenesis within a polylactic acid–calcium phosphate glass scaffold. Biomaterials 30(25):4219–4226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Morin C, Vass V, Hellmich C (2017) Micromechanics of elastoplastic porous polycrystals: theory, algorithm, and application to osteonal bone. Int J Plast 91:238–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olivares AL, Marsal È, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2009) Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30(30):6142–6149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pastrama MI, Scheiner S, Pivonka P, Hellmich C (2018) A mathematical multiscale model of bone remodeling, accounting for pore space-specific mechanosensation. Bone 107: 208–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D (2005) 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech 38(3):543–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Porter JR, Ruckh TT, Popat KC (2009) Bone tissue engineering: a review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies. Biotechnol Prog 25(6):1539–1560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR (2006) Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27(18):3413–3431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Robling AG, Castillo A, Turner CH (2006) Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8:455–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sandino C, Lacroix D (2011) A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a cap scaffold based on micro-ct finite element models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10(4):565–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sandino C, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2008) A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 41(5):1005–1014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanz-Herrera JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M, Micro-macro M (2008) Numerical modelling of bone regeneration in tissue engineering. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(33–40):3092–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanz-Herrera JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M (2009a) On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: a computational multiscale approach. Acta Biomater 5(1):219–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanz-Herrera JA, García-Aznar JM, Doblaré M (2009b) A mathematical approach to bone tissue engineering. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 367(1895):2055–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scheiner S, Sinibaldi R, Pichler B, Komlev V, Renghini C, Vitale-Brovarone C, Rustichelli F, Hellmich C (2009) Micromechanics of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds, based on resolution error-cleared computer tomography. Biomaterials 30(12):2411–2419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Scheiner S, Pivonka P, Hellmich C (2013) Coupling systems biology with multi-scale mechanics, for computer simulations of bone remodeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scheiner S, Komlev VS, Gurin AN, Hellmich C (2016a) Multiscale mathematical modeling in dental tissue engineering: towards computer-aided design of a regenerative system based on hydroxyapatite granules, focusing on early and mid-term stiffness recovery. Front Physiol 7(383):1–18Google Scholar
  62. Scheiner S, Komlev VS, Hellmich C (2016b) Strength increase during ceramic biomaterial-induced bone regeneration: a micromechanical study. Int J Fract 202(2):217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shareef MY, Messer PF, van Noort R (1993) Fabrication, characterization and fracture study of a machinable hydroxyapatite ceramic. Biomaterials 14(1):69–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Simmons CA, Meguid SA, Pilliar RM (2001) Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains. J Orthop Res 19(2):187–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sturm S, Zhou S, Mai Y-W, Li Q (2010) On stiffness of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering – a numerical study. J Biomech 43(9):1738–1744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Thompson M, Willis JR (1991) A reformation of the equations anisotropic elasticity. J Appl Mech 58(3):612–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Truscello S, Kerckhofs G, Van Bael S, Pyka G, Schrooten J, Van Oosterwyck H (2012) Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study. Acta Biomater 8(4):1648–1658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. van Gaalen S, Kruyt M, Meijer G, Mistry A, Mikos A, van den Beucken J, Jansen J, de Groot K, Cancedda R, Olivo C, Yaszemski M, Dhert W (2008) Chapter 19. Tissue engineering of bone. In: Van Blitterswijk C, Thomsen P, Lindahl A, Hubbell J, Williams DF, Cancedda R, de Bruijn JD, Sohier J (eds) Tissue Engineering. Academic, Burlington, pp 559–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Voronov R, VanGordon S, Sikavitsas VI, Papavassiliou DV (2010) Computational modeling of flow-induced shear stresses within 3D salt-leached porous scaffolds imaged via micro-ct. J Biomech 43(7):1279–1286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams DF (2008) On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 29(20):2941–2953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM, Flanagan CL, Krebsbach PH, Feinberg SE, Hollister SJ, Das S (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26(23):4817–4827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zaoui A (1997) Chapter 6. Structural morphology and constitutive behavior of microheterogeneous materials. In: Suquet PM (ed) Continuum micromechanics, CISM courses and lectures, vol 377. Springer, Wien/New York, pp 291–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zaoui A (2002) Continuum micromechanics: survey. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 128(8):808–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Scheiner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vladimir S. Komlev
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christian Hellmich
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien)ViennaAustria
  2. 2.A.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations