Advertisement

Normal and Abnormal Aging (General Perspective for the Oncologist)

  • George E. Taffet
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Normal aging, from maturity to senescence, is accompanied by a large number of physiologic, organ, biochemical, and molecular changes. In the unchallenged state, at homeostasis, age-related decrements in function from these changes are few in part because reserves are used to maintain homeostasis. When challenged, whether by diseases, environment, medications, etc., those age-related changes become apparent. These changes lead to increased vulnerability with aging, called “homeostenosis.” Rather than the reserves disappearing with age, the reserves are invoked in the older person just to maintain homeostasis. Therefore, less are available to respond to disease or medication or other challenge. Broadly this pattern is seen in the cardiovascular system, the hematological system, and the renal system, and elsewhere. When there are essentially no reserves available for challenges, when any challenge overwhelms them, that is frailty. Additionally, aging can modify the impact, presentation, and natural history of any illness. This is because the substrate, the aging person, more than the disease pathophysiology, has been modified. In any given person, the system where the reserves are the least may be the most likely to fail with any challenge. For example, in older patients with dementia, delirium may be the presenting symptom for a urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal bleed, or myocardial infarction; the weakest link fails first. Understanding homeostenosis helps one to understand the apparent vulnerability of the elderly that are in our care.

Keywords

Homeostenosis Frailty Physiologic reserves Vulnerability 

References

  1. Anisimov VN. Effect of host age on tumor growth rate in rodents. Front Biosci. 2006;11:412–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer RJ, et al. Estimation of severity of illness with APACHE II: age-related implications in cardiac arrest outcomes. Resuscitation. 1994;27(3):189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Channer KS, Jones JV. The contribution of atrial systole to mitral diastolic blood flow increases during exercise in humans. J Physiol. 1989;411:53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng S, et al. Correlates of echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling over the adult life course: longitudinal observations from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;122(6):570–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christou DD, Seals DR. Decreased maximal heart rate with aging is related to reduced {beta}-adrenergic responsiveness but is largely explained by a reduction in intrinsic heart rate. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(1): 24–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowdry EV, Allen E. Problems of ageing: biological and medical aspects. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1939. p. 758.Google Scholar
  7. Craft N, Schwartz JB. Effects of age on intrinsic heart rate, heart rate variability, and AV conduction in healthy humans. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(4 Pt 2):H1441–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirovic D, Rattan SI. Establishing cellular stress response profiles as biomarkers of homeodynamics, health and hormesis. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(1):94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ershler WB, et al. B16 murine melanoma and aging: slower growth and longer survival in old mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984;72(1):161–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleg JL, et al. Impact of age on the cardiovascular response to dynamic upright exercise in healthy men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78(3):890–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hung CL, et al. Age- and sex-related influences on left ventricular mechanics in elderly individuals free of prevalent heart failure: the ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(1):pii: e004510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isoyama S, et al. Effect of age on the development of cardiac hypertrophy produced by aortic constriction in the rat. Circ Res. 1987;61(3):337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaesberg PR, Ershler WB. The importance of immunesenescence in the incidence and malignant properties of cancer in hosts of advanced age. J Gerontol. 1989;44(6):63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kane RL, et al. The association between geriatric syndromes and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(5): 896–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlamangla AS, Singer BH, Seeman TE. Reduction in allostatic load in older adults is associated with lower all-cause mortality risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychosom Med. 2006;68(3):500–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitzman DW, et al. Age-related alterations of Doppler left ventricular filling indexes in normal subjects are independent of left ventricular mass, heart rate, contractility and loading conditions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(5):1243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knaus WA, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuo LC, et al. Quantification of atrial contribution to left ventricular filling by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and the effect of age in normal and diseased hearts. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(12):1174–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lipsitz LA, Goldberger AL. Loss of “complexity” and aging. Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. JAMA. 1992;267(13):1806–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masoro EJ. Caloric restriction and aging: controversial issues. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(1): 14–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pili R, et al. Altered angiogenesis underlying age-dependent changes in tumor growth. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(17):1303–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sawhney R, Sehl M, Naeim A. Physiologic aspects of aging: impact on cancer management and decision making, part I. Cancer J. 2005;11(6):449–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seeman TE, et al. Price of adaptation – allostatic load and its health consequences. MacArthur studies of successful aging. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(19):2259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sehl M, Sawhney R, Naeim A. Physiologic aspects of aging: impact on cancer management and decision making, part II. Cancer J. 2005;11(6):461–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strait JB, Lakatta EG. Aging-associated cardiovascular changes and their relationship to heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2012;8(1):143–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2011.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takahashi T, et al. Age-related differences in the expression of proto-oncogene and contractile protein genes in response to pressure overload in the rat myocardium. J Clin Investig. 1992;89(3):939–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmerman JE, et al. Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III predictions of hospital mortality in an independent database. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(8):1317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zimmerman JE, et al. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geriatrics and Cardiovascular Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Division of GeriatricsHouston Methodist HospitalHoustonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • William Dale
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Supportive Care MedicineCity of Hope Duarte - Comprehensive Cancer CenterDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations