Advertisement

Water: Many-Body Potential from First Principles (From the Gas to the Liquid Phase)

  • Francesco PaesaniEmail author
Reference work entry
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Computer simulations have become an integral part of the toolbox of any researcher interested in molecular sciences, often providing new insights that are difficult (if not impossible) to obtain by other means. However, the predictive power of a computer simulation directly depends on the level of realism that can be used to represent the molecular system of interest. Since the early times of computer simulations, the search for a molecular model of water capable of describing its unique properties across different phases has been the focus of intense research. The continued increase in computer power accompanied by advances in the design of efficient algorithms for correlated electronic structure calculations and tremendous progress in the representation of global potential energy surfaces have recently opened the doors to the development of molecular models rigorously derived from many-body expansions of interaction energies. By quantitatively reproducing individual interaction terms between molecules, it has been shown that these many-body potential energy functions can achieve unprecedented accuracy in computer simulations. This chapter provides an overview of the theoretical formalism underlying such many-body representations, with a particular focus on the performance of the MB-pol potential energy function in predicting the energetics as well as structural, thermodynamic, dynamical, and spectroscopic properties of water from the gas to the condensed phase.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through Grants CHE-1453204, ACI-1642336, and ACI-1053575.

References

  1. Abu-Mostafa YS, Magdon-Ismail M, Lin H-T (2012) Learning from Data. AML BookGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamo C, Barone V (1999) Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: the PBE0 model. J Chem Phys 110:6158–6170CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler TB, Knizia G, Werner HJ (2007) A simple and efficient CCSD(T)-F12 approximation. J Chem Phys 127:221106CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Babin V, Medders GR, Paesani F (2012) Toward a universal water model: first principles simulations from the dimer to the liquid phase. J Phys Chem Lett 3:3765–3769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babin V, Leforestier C, Paesani F (2013) Development of a “first principles” water potential with flexible monomers: dimer potential energy surface, VRT spectrum, and second virial coefficient. J Chem Theory Comput 9:5395–5403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babin V, Medders GR, Paesani F (2014) Development of a “first principles” water potential with flexible monomers. II: trimer potential energy surface, third virial coefficient, and small clusters. J Chem Theory Comput 10:1599–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajaj P, Götz AW, Paesani F (2016) Toward chemical accuracy in the description of ion-water interactions through many-body representations. I. Halide-water dimer potential energy surfaces. J Chem Theory Comput 12:2698–2705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ball P (2008) Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem Rev 108:74–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barker JA, Watts RO (1969) Structure of water; a Monte Carlo calculation. Chem Phys Lett 3:144–145CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartók AP, Payne MC, Kondor R, Csányi G (2010) Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys Rev Lett 104:136403CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates DM, Tschumper GS (2009) CCSD(T) complete basis set limit relative energies for low-lying water hexamer structures. J Phys Chem A 113:3555–3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becke AD (1988) Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys Rev A 38:3098–3100CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. 3. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Behler J (2016) Perspective: machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J Chem Phys 145:170901CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Braams BJ, Bowman JM (2009) Permutationally invariant potential energy surfaces in high dimensionality. Int Rev Phys Chem 28:577–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown SE, Götz AW, Cheng X, Steele RP, Mandelshtam VA et al (2017) Monitoring water clusters “melt” through vibrational spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 139:7082–7088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bukowski R, Szalewicz K, Groenenboom GC, van der Avoird A (2007) Predictions of the properties of water from first principles. Science 315:1249–1252CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Bukowski R, Szalewicz K, Groenenboom GC, van der Avoird A (2008) Polarizable interaction potential for water from coupled cluster calculations. II. Applications to dimer spectra, virial coefficients, and simulations of liquid water. J Chem Phys 128:094314CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Burnham CJ, Anick DJ, Mankoo PK, Reiter GF (2008) The vibrational proton potential in bulk liquid water and ice. J Chem Phys 128:154519CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Chai JD, Head-Gordon M (2008) Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:6615–6620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheng XL, Steele RP (2014) Efficient anharmonic vibrational spectroscopy for large molecules using local-mode coordinates. J Chem Phys 141:104105CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Cheng XL, Talbot JJ, Steele RP (2016) Tuning vibrational mode localization with frequency windowing. J Chem Phys 145:124112CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Cisneros GA, Piquemal J-P, Darden TA (2006) Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics electrostatic embedding with continuous and discrete functions. J Phys Chem B 110:13682–13684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cisneros GA, Elking D, Piquemal J-P, Darden TA (2007) Numerical fitting of molecular properties to Hermite gaussians. J Phys Chem A 111:12049–12056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cisneros GA, Wikfeldt KT, Ojamae L, Lu JB, Xu Y et al (2016) Modeling molecular interactions in water: from pairwise to many-body potential energy functions. Chem Rev 116:7501–7528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cole WTS, Farrell JD, Wales DJ, Saykally RJ (2016) Structure and torsional dynamics of the water octamer from THz laser spectroscopy near 215 mu m. Science 352:1194–1197CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunning TH (1989) Gaussian-basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. 1. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J Chem Phys 90:1007–1023CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenberg D, Kauzmann W (1969) The structure and properties of water. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans MW, Refson K, Swamy KN, Lie GC, Clementi E (1987) Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water with an ab initio flexible water-water interaction potential. 2. The effect of internal vibrations on the time correlation functions. Phys Rev A 36:3935–3942CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Fanourgakis GS, Xantheas SS (2008) Development of transferable interaction potentials for water. V. Extension of the flexible, polarizable, Thole-type model potential (TTM3-F, v. 3.0) to describe the vibrational spectra of water clusters and liquid water. J Chem Phys 128:074506CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Frank HS, Wen WY (1957) Structural aspects of ion-solvent interaction in aqueous solutions – a suggested picture of water structure. Discuss Faraday Soc 24:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA et al (2009) Gaussian 09. Gaussian, Inc., WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Gao JL, Truhlar DG, Wang YJ, Mazack MJM, Loffler P et al (2014) Explicit polarization: a quantum mechanical framework for developing next generation force fields. Acc Chem Res 47:2837–2845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gillan MJ, Alfè D, Michaelides A (2016) Perspective: how good is DFT for water? J Chem Phys 144:130901CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. Goerigk L, Grimme S (2011) A thorough benchmark of density functional methods for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:6670–6688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gora U, Podeszwa R, Cencek W, Szalewicz K (2011) Interaction energies of large clusters from many-body expansion. J Chem Phys 135:224102CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H (2010) A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys 132:154104CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Guillot B (2002) A reappraisal of what we have learnt during three decades of computer simulations on water. J Mol Liq 101:219–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Halkier A, Helgaker T, Jorgensen P, Klopper W, Olsen J (1999a) Basis-set convergence of the energy in molecular Hartree-Fock calculations. Chem Phys Lett 302:437–446CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Halkier A, Klopper W, Helgaker T, Jorgensen P, Taylor PR (1999b) Basis set convergence of the interaction energy of hydrogen-bonded complexes. J Chem Phys 111:9157–9167CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. Handley CM, Hawe GI, Kell DB, Popelier PLA (2009) Optimal construction of a fast and accurate polarisable water potential based on multipole moments trained by machine learning. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:6365–6376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hankins D, Moskowitz JW, Stillinger FH (1970) Water molecule interactions. J Chem Phys 53:4544CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  43. Hasegawa T, Tanimura Y (2011) A polarizable water model for intramolecular and intermolecular vibrational spectroscopies. J Phys Chem B 115:5545–5553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Howard JC, Gray JL, Hardwick AJ, Nguyen LT, Tschumper GS (2014) Getting down to the fundamentals of hydrogen bonding: anharmonic vibrational frequencies of (HF)2 and (H2O)2 from ab initio electronic structure computations. J Chem Theory Comput 10:5426–5435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khaliullin RZ, Cobar EA, Lochan RC, Bell AT, Head-Gordon M (2007) Unravelling the origin of intermolecular interactions using absolutely localized molecular orbitals. J Phys Chem A 111:8753–8765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Khaliullin RZ, Bell AT, Head-Gordon M (2008) Analysis of charge transfer effects in molecular complexes based on absolutely localized molecular orbitals. J Chem Phys 128:184112CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  47. Knizia G, Adler TB, Werner HJ (2009) Simplified CCSD(T)-F12 methods: theory and benchmarks. J Chem Phys 130:054104CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  48. Manna D, Kesharwani MK, Sylvetsky N, Martin JML (2017) Conventional and explicitly correlated ab initio benchmark study on water clusters: revision of the BEGDB and WATER27 data sets. J Chem Theory Comput 13:3136–3152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mardirossian N, Head-Gordon M (2015) Mapping the genome of meta-generalized gradient approximation density functionals: the search for B97M-V. J Chem Phys 142:074111CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  50. Maréchal Y (2007) The hydrogen bond and the water molecule: the physics and chemistry of water, aqueous and bio media. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  51. Matsuoka O, Clementi E, Yoshimine M (1976) CI study of the water dimer potential surface. J Chem Phys 64:1351–1361CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. Medders GR, Paesani F (2013) Many-body convergence of the electrostatic properties of water. J Chem Theory Comput 9:4844–4852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Medders GR, Paesani F (2015) Infrared and Raman spectroscopy of liquid water through “first-principles” many-body molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 11:1145–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Medders GR, Paesani F (2016) Dissecting the molecular structure of the air/water interface from quantum simulations of the sum-frequency generation spectrum. J Am Chem Soc 138:3912–3919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Medders GR, Babin V, Paesani F (2014) Development of a “first-principles” water potential with flexible monomers. III. Liquid phase properties. J Chem Theory Comput 10:2906–2910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Medders GR, Götz AW, Morales MA, Bajaj P, Paesani F (2015) On the representation of many-body interactions in water. J Chem Phys 143:104102CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  57. Moberg DR, Straight SC, Knight C, Paesani F (2017) Molecular origin of the vibrational structure of ice Ih. J Phys Chem Lett 8:2579–2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moberg DR, Straight SC, Paesani F et al (2018) Temperature dependence of the air/water interface revealed by polarization sensitive sum-frequency generation spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 122:4356–4365Google Scholar
  59. Morales MA, Gergely JR, McMinis J, McMahon JM, Kim J et al (2014) Quantum Monte Carlo benchmark of exchange-correlation functionals for bulk water. J Chem Theory Comput 10:2355–2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Niesar U, Corongiu G, Clementi E, Kneller GR, Bhattacharya DK (1990) Molecular dynamics simulations of liquid water using the NCC ab initio potential. J Phys Chem 94:7949–7956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Paesani F (2016) Getting the right answers for the right reasons: toward predictive molecular simulations of water with many-body potential energy functions. Acc Chem Res 49:1844–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paesani F, Voth GA (2010) A quantitative assessment of the accuracy of centroid molecular dynamics for the calculation of the infrared spectrum of liquid water. J Chem Phys 132:014105CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  63. Partridge H, Schwenke DW (1997) The determination of an accurate isotope dependent potential energy surface for water from extensive ab initio calculations and experimental data. J Chem Phys 106:4618–4639CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  64. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  65. Peterson KA, Adler TB, Werner HJ (2008) Systematically convergent basis sets for explicitly correlated wavefunctions: the atoms H, He, B-Ne, and Al-Ar. J Chem Phys 128:084102CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  66. Pham CH, Reddy SK, Chen K, Knight C, Paesani F (2017) Many-body interactions in ice. J Chem Theory Comput 13:1778–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Piquemal JP, Cisneros GA, Reinhardt P, Gresh N, Darden TA (2006) Towards a force field based on density fitting. J Chem Phys 124:104101CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  68. Rahman A, Stillinger FH (1971) Molecular dynamics study of liquid water. J Chem Phys 55:3336CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  69. Rappoport D, Furche F (2010) Property-optimized Gaussian basis sets for molecular response calculations. J Chem Phys 133:134105CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  70. Reddy SK, Straight SC, Bajaj P, Pham CH, Riera M et al (2016) On the accuracy of the MB-pol many-body potential for water: interaction energies, vibrational frequencies, and classical thermodynamic and dynamical properties from clusters to liquid water and ice. J Chem Phys 145:194504CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  71. Reddy SK, Moberg DR, Straight SC, Paesani F (2017) Temperature-dependent vibrational spectra and structure of liquid water from classical and quantum simulations with the MB-pol potential energy function. J Chem Phys 147:244504CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  72. Ren PY, Ponder JW (2003) Polarizable atomic multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J Phys Chem B 107:5933–5947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rezac J, Hobza P (2013) Describing noncovalent interactions beyond the common approximations: how accurate is the “gold standard,” CCSD(T) at the complete basis set limit? J Chem Theory Comput 9:2151–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Richardson JO, Perez C, Lobsiger S, Reid AA, Temelso B et al (2016) Concerted hydrogen-bond breaking by quantum tunneling in the water hexamer prism. Science 351:1310–1313CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  75. Riera M, Mardirossian N, Bajaj P, Götz AW, Paesani F (2017) Toward chemical accuracy in the description of ion-water interactions through many-body representations. Alkali-water dimer potential energy surfaces. J Chem Phys 147:161715CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  76. Rossi M, Liu HC, Paesani F, Bowman J, Ceriotti M (2014) Communication: on the consistency of approximate quantum dynamics simulation methods for vibrational spectra in the condensed phase. J Chem Phys 141:181101CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  77. Shao YH, Gan ZT, Epifanovsky E, Gilbert ATB, Wormit M et al (2015) Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package. Mol Phys 113:184–215CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  78. Shvab I, Sadus RJ (2016) Atomistic water models: aqueous thermodynamic properties from ambient to supercritical conditions. Fluid Phase Equilib 407:7–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simova L, Rezac J, Hobza P (2013) Convergence of the interaction energies in noncovalent complexes in the coupled-cluster methods up to full configuration interaction. J Chem Theory Comput 9:3420–3428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Skinner LB, Huang CC, Schlesinger D, Pettersson LGM, Nilsson A et al (2013) Benchmark oxygen-oxygen pair-distribution function of ambient water from x-ray diffraction measurements with a wide Q-range. J Chem Phys 138:074506CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  81. Sode O, Cherry JN (2017) Development of a flexible-monomer two-body carbon dioxide potential and its application to clusters up to (CO2)13. J Comput Chem 38:2763–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Soper AK, Benmore CJ (2008) Quantum differences between heavy and light water. Phys Rev Lett 101:065502CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  83. Stone AJ (1997) The theory of intermolecular forces. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Straight SC, Paesani F (2016) Exploring electrostatic effects on the hydrogen bond network of liquid water through many-body molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem B 120:8539–8546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sun JW, Ruzsinszky A, Perdew JP (2015) Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional. Phys Rev Lett 115:036402CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  86. Tao FM, Pan YK (1992) Moller-Plesset perturbation investigation of the He2 potential and the role of midbond basis functions. J Chem Phys 97:4989–4995CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  87. Tao JM, Perdew JP, Staroverov VN, Scuseria GE (2003) Climbing the density functional ladder: nonempirical meta-generalized gradient approximation designed for molecules and solids. Phys Rev Lett 91:146401CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  88. Temelso B, Archer KA, Shields GC (2011) Benchmark structures and binding energies of small water clusters with anharmonicity corrections. J Phys Chem A 115:12034–12046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thole BT (1981) Molecular polarizabilities calculated with a modified dipole interaction. Chem Phys 59:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Torheyden M, Jansen G (2006) A new potential energy surface for the water dimer obtained from separate fits of ab initio electrostatic, induction, dispersion and exchange energy contributions. Mol Phys 104:2101–2138CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  91. Tuckerman ME (2010) Statistical mechanics: theory and molecular simulation. Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  92. van Duijnen PT, Swart M (1998) Molecular and atomic polarizabilities: Thole's model revisited. J Phys Chem A 102:2399–2407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vega C, Abascal JLF (2011) Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:19663–19688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Voth GA (1996) Path-integral centroid methods in quantum statistical mechanics and dynamics. Adv Chem Phys 93:135–218Google Scholar
  95. Vydrov OA, Van Voorhis T (2010) Nonlocal van der Waals density functional: the simpler the better. J Chem Phys 133:244103CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang LP, Head-Gordon T, Ponder JW, Ren P, Chodera JD et al (2013) Systematic improvement of a classical molecular model of water. J Phys Chem B 117:9956–9972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wang QK, Bowman JM (2017) Two-component, ab initio potential energy surface for CO2-H2O, extension to the hydrate clathrate, CO@(HO), and VSCF/VCI vibrational analyses of both. J Chem Phys 147:161714CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  98. Wang YM, Bowman JM (2011) Ab initio potential and dipole moment surfaces for water. II. Local-monomer calculations of the infrared spectra of water clusters. J Chem Phys 134:154510CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang YM, Huang XC, Shepler BC, Braams BJ, Bowman JM (2011) Flexible, ab initio potential, and dipole moment surfaces for water. I. Tests and applications for clusters up to the 22-mer. J Chem Phys 134:094509CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  100. Weigend F, Ahlrichs R (2005) Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:3297–3305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Witt A, Ivanov SD, Shiga M, Forbert H, Marx D (2009) On the applicability of centroid and ring polymer path integral molecular dynamics for vibrational spectroscopy. J Chem Phys 130:194510CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhang YK, Yang WT (1998) Comment on “generalized gradient approximation made simple”. Phys Rev Lett 80:890CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor Chem Accounts 120:215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Materials Science and Engineering, and San Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Roberto Car
    • 1
  • Biswajit Santra
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations