Nanofiber Electrodes for Biosensors

  • Subhash Singh
Living reference work entry


Nanoscience and nanotechnology impact our lives in many ways, and the production of engineered nanofibers represents a scientific breakthrough in material design and the development of new consumer products from electronics, aerospace, automobile, photonic devices, and biosensors to renewable energy materials that are expected to impact almost every industrial and manufacturing sector, including biomedicine and biotechnology (vascular, neural, bone, cartilage, and tendon/ligament tissue engineering) and electrochemical energy storage because of their excellent conductivities, extremely large surface areas, and structural stability. Among the reported functionalities, nanofiber electrodes are popularly used as biosensors and have been extensively investigated due to their importance in solving the challenges in bioanalytical problems including clinical application, health care, chemical and biological analysis, environmental monitoring, and food processing industries. Graphene, graphene oxide, chemically reduced graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), diamond, carbon nanofibers (CNFs), ZnO nanofibers, conductive polymers (like polypyrrole, polyaniline, polythiophene nanofibers), Pt–Au nanoparticle-decorated titania nanotube array, boron-doped diamond nanorods, and gold nanofiber electrodes are some of the biosensing materials used for DNA biosensor, glucose biosensor, electrochemical biosensors, or electrocatalytic biosensor, respectively. Carbon-based materials such as diamond and carbon nanofibers are highly important for the construction of practical nanoscale sensing devices and systems because of high degree of chemical stability, their relatively wide potential windows in aqueous media, good biocompatibility, low cost, and relative chemical inertness in most electrolyte solutions. Innovation and research in the field of nanofibers is paving way for a new era in biosensing application.


Nanofiber electrodes Carbon nanofiber Carbon nanotubes Graphene Glucose Dopamine Proteins Uric acid Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Ribonucleic acid (RNA) Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2Biosensor 


  1. 1.
    Clark LC Jr, Lyons C (1962) Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann N Y Acad Sci 102:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thevenot DR, Toth K, Durst RA, Wilson GS (1999) Electrochemical biosensors: recommended definitions and classification. Pure Appl Chem 71:2333–2348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marx S, Josec MV, Andersenc JD, Russell AJ (2011) Electrospun gold nanofiber electrodes for biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 26:2981–2986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kenry, Lim CT (2017) Nanofiber technology: current status and emerging developments. Prog Polym Sci 70:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McNeil SE (2009) Nanoparticle therapeutics: a personal perspective. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1:264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kenry, Lim CT (2013) Synthesis, optical properties, and chemical–biological sensing applications of one-dimensional inorganic semiconductor nanowires. Prog Mater Sci 58:705–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang X, Zou W, Su Y, Zhu Y, Jiang H, Shen J et al (2014) Activated nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers with hierarchical pore as efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalyst for microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 266:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Behrens AM, Casey BJ, Sikorski MJ, Wu KL, Tutak W, Sandler AD et al (2014) In situ deposition of PLGA nanofibers via solution blow spinning. ACS Macro Lett 3:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shang M, Wang W, Sun S, Gao E, Zhang Z, Zhang L et al (2013) The design and realization of a large-area flexible nanofiber-based mat for pollutant degradation: an application in photocatalysis. Nanoscale 5:5036–5042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang P, Zhao X, Zhang X, Lai Y, Wang X, Li J, Wei G, Su Z (2014) Electrospun doping of carbon nanotubes and platinum nanoparticles into the β-phase polyvinylidene difluoride nanofibrous membrane for biosensor and catalysis applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:7563–7571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hasegawa T, Mikuni T (2014) Higher-order structural analysis of nylon-66 nanofibers prepared by carbon dioxide laser supersonic drawing and exhibiting near-equilibrium melting temperature. J Appl Polym Sci 131(40361):1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suzuki A, Hayashi H (2013) Ethylene tetrafluoroethylene nanofibers prepared by CO2 laser supersonic drawing. Express Polym Lett 7(6):519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Medeiros ES, Glenn GM, Klamczynski AP, Orts WJ, Mattoso (2010) LHC solution blow spinning. US Patent 0062.08Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu X, Zhang X, Shen X, Li H, Takai O, Saito N (2014) Plasma-induced synthesis of CuO nanofibers and ZnO nanoflowers in water. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 34:1129–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ren L, Kotha SP (2014) Centrifugal jet spinning for highly efficient and large-scale fabrication of barium titanate nanofibers. Mater Lett 117:153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loscertales IG, Barrero A, Guerrero I, Cortijo R, Marquez M, Ganan-Calvo AM (2002) Micro/nano encapsulation via electrified coaxial liquid jets. Science 295:1695–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hao C, Ding L, Zhang X, Ju H (2007) Biocompatible conductive architecture of carbon nanofiber-doped chitosan prepared with controllable electrodeposition for cytosensing. Anal Chem 79:4442–4447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu L, Peng X, Huo K, Chen R, Fu J, Li Y, Lee LYS, Wong KY, Chu PK (2016) Dominant factors governing the electron transfer kinetics and electrochemical biosensing properties of carbon nanofiber arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(42):28872–28879Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jun J, Lee JS, Shin DH, Jang J (2014) Aptamer-functionalized hybrid carbon nanofiber FET-type electrode for a highly sensitive and selective platelet-derived growth factor biosensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:13859–13865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim SG, Lee JS, Jun J, Shin DH, Jang J (2016) Ultrasensitive bisphenol a field-effect transistor sensor using an aptamer-modified multichannel carbon nanofiber transducer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(10):6602–6610Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alizadeh T, Mirzagholipur SA (2014) Nafion-free non-enzymatic amperometric glucose sensor based on copper oxide nanoparticles−graphene nanocomposite. Sens Actuators B 198:438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Unnikrishnan B, Palanisamy S, Chen SM (2013) A simple electrochemical approach to fabricate a glucose biosensor based on graphene-glucose oxidase biocomposite. Biosens Bioelectron 39:70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun W, Cao L, Deng Y, Gong S, Shi F, Li G, Sun Z (2013) Direct electrochemistry with enhanced electrocatalytic activity of hemoglobin in hybrid modified electrodes composed of graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Anal Chim Acta 781:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Serafín V, Agui L, YanezSedeno P, Pingarron JM (2014) Determination of prolactin hormone in serum and urine using an electrochemical immunosensor based on poly(pyrrolepropionic acid)/carbon nanotubes hybrid modified electrodes. Sensors Actuators B Chem 195:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li SJ, Du JM, Zhang JP, Zhang MJ, Chen J (2014) A glassy carbon electrode modified with a film composed of cobalt oxide nanoparticles and graphene for electrochemical sensing of H2O2. Microchim Acta 181:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu D, Guo A, Guo Z, Xie L, Wei Q, Du B (2014) Simultaneous electrochemical detection of cervical cancer markers using reduced graphene oxide-tetraethylene pentamine as electrode materials and distinguishable redox probes as labels. Biosens Bioelectron 54:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang J, Shi A, Fang X, Han X, Zhang Y (2014) Ultrasensitive electrochemical supersandwich DNA biosensor using a glassy carbon electrode modified with gold particle-decorated sheets of graphene oxide. Microchim Acta 181:935–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pakapongpan S, Mensing JP, Phokharatkul D, Lomas T, Tuantranont (2014) A highly selective electrochemical sensor for ascorbic acid based on a novel hybrid graphene-copper phthalocyanine-polyaniline nanocomposites. Electrochim Acta 133:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A, Pouladsaz P (2014) Voltammetric determination of riboflavin based on electrocatalytic oxidation at zeolite-modified carbon paste electrodes. J Ind Eng Chem 20:2146–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baghizadeh A, Karimi-Maleh H, Khoshnama Z, Hassankhani A, Abbasghorbani M (2015) A voltammetric sensor for simultaneous determination of vitamin C and vitamin B6 in food samples using ZrO2 nanoparticle/ionic liquids carbon paste electrode. Food Anal Methods 8:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumar DR, Manoj D, Santhanalakshmi J (2014) Electrostatic fabrication of oleylamine capped nickel oxide nanoparticles anchored multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposite: a robust electrochemical determination of riboflavin at nanomolar levels. Anal Methods 6:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gupta RK, Periyakaruppan A, Meyyappan M, Koehne JE (2014) Label-free detection of C-reactive protein using a carbon nanofiber based biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 59:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tran HV, Piro B, Reisberg S, Tran LD, Duc HT, Pham MC (2013) Label-free and reagentless electrochemical detection of micro-RNAs using a conducting polymer nanostructured by carbon nanotubes: application to prostate cancer biomarker miR-141. Biosens Bioelectron 49:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gao FL, Zhu Z, Lei JP, Geng Y, Ju HX (2013) Sub-femtomolar electrochemical detection of DNA using surface circular strand-replacement polymerization and gold nanoparticle catalyzed silver deposition for signal amplification. Biosens Bioelectron 39:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suzuki I, Fukuda M, Shirakawa K, Jiko H, Gotoh M (2013) Carbon nanotube multi-electrode array chips for noninvasive real-time measurement of dopamine, action potentials, and postsynaptic potentials. Biosens Bioelectron 49:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    de Souza Ribeiro FA, Tarley CRT, Borges KB, Pereira AC (2013) Development of a square wave voltammetric method for dopamine determination using a biosensor based on multiwall carbon nanotubes paste and crude extract of cucurbita pepo L. Sensors Actuators B Chem 185:743–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lin KC, Lin YC, Chen SM (2013) A highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes decorated with nickel and copper nanoparticles. Electrochim Acta 96:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vilian ATE, Chen SM, Lou BS (2014) A simple strategy for the immobilization of catalase on multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly (L-Lysine) biocomposite for the detection of H2O2 and iodate. Biosens Bioelectron 61:639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dutta D, Chandra S, Swain AK, Bahadur D (2014) SnO2 quantum dots-reduced graphene oxide composite for enzyme-free ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of urea. Anal Chem 86:5914–5921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moraes FC, Silva TA, Cesarino I, Lanza MRV, Machado SAS (2013) Antibiotic detection in urine using electrochemical sensors based on vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Electroanalysis 25:2092–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gheibi S, Karimi-Maleh H, Khalilzadeh MA, Bagheri HJ (2015) A new voltammetric sensor for electrocatalytic determination of vitamin C in fruit juices and fresh vegetable juice using modified multi-wall carbon nanotubes paste electrode. J Food Sci Technol 52:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rafati AA, Afraz A (2014) Amperometric sensing of anti-HIV drug zidovudine on Ag nanofilm-multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater Sci Eng C 39:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ensafi AA, Amini M, Rezaei B (2013) Biosensor based on dsDNA decorated chitosan modified multiwall carbon nanotubes for voltammetric biodetection of herbicide amitrole. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 109:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sun X, Cao Y, Gong Z, Wang X, Zhang Y, Gao J (2012) An amperometric immunosensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes-thionine-chitosan nanocomposite film for chlorpyrifos detection. Sensors 12:17247–17261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Han M, Qu Y, Chen S, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Ma M, Wang Z, Zhan G, Li C (2013) Amperometric biosensor for bisphenol a based on a glassy electrode modified with a nanocomposite made from polylysine, single walled carbon nanotubes and tyrosinase. Microchim Acta 180:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gomes-Filho SLR, Dias ACMS, Silva MMS, Silva BVM, Dutra RF (2013) A carbon nanotube-based electrochemical immunosensor for cardiac troponin T. Microchem J 109:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Deng W, Liu F, Ge S, Yu J, Yan M, Song X (2014) A dual amplification strategy for ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence immunoassay based on a Pt nanoparticles dotted graphene−carbon nanotubes composite and carbon dots functionalized mesoporous Pt/Fe. Analyst 139:1713–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cao Q, Zhao H, Yang Y, He Y, Ding N, Wang J et al (2011) Electrochemical immunosensor for casein based on gold nanoparticles and poly(L-arginine)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite film functionalized interface. Biosens Bioelectron 26:3469–3474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Silva TA, Zanin H, Vicentini FC, Corat EJ, Fatibello-Filho O (2014) Differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of nanomolar levels of atorvastatin calcium in pharmaceutical and biological samples using a vertically aligned carbon nanotube/graphene oxide electrode. Analyst 139:2832–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Golsheikh AM, Huang NM, Lim HN, Zakaria R (2014) One-pot sonochemical synthesis of reduced graphene oxide uniformly decorated with ultrafine silver nanoparticles for non-enzymatic detection of H2O2 and optical detection of mercury ions. RSC Adv 4:36401–36411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subhash Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Research and Development, Mechanical Engineering DepartmentLovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia

Personalised recommendations