Advertisement

Chromium

  • John Havens Cary
  • Howard I. Maibach
  • Desmond Burrows
  • Jurij J. Hostynek
Living reference work entry

Abstract

  • Hexavalent chromium (salt) is a form of chromium responsible for sensitization and contact dermatitis in chromate allergy.

  • Exposure to chromium is often occupational and is commonly seen among building workers handling cement, leather workers, electroplaters, welders, and painters.

  • Addition of ferrous sulfate has reduced the incidence of chromate allergy in the Scandinavian countries, since it decreases the concentration of hexavalent chromate in cement.

  • Simple office-based tests are helpful in detecting chromium in objects.

  • Patch testing with chromate (in chromium-sensitive subjects) to detect the minimum elicitation threshold (MET) is best done by using serial dilutions of Cr(III) and Cr(VI).

  • Chromium can cause lipid peroxidation, nephrotoxicity, and affect the immune system.

  • Reduction or elimination of exposure is the best method for prevention of chromium-induced contact allergy.

Keywords

Chromium allergy Chromate allergy Cr(VI) Cr(III) 

References

  1. Accominotti M, Bost M, Haudrechy P et al (1998) Contribution to chromium and nickel enrichment during cooking of foods in stainless steel utensils. Contact Dermatitis 38(6):305–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allenby CF, Goodwin BF (1983) Influence of detergent washing powders on minimal eliciting patch test concentration of nickel and chromium. Contact Dermatitis 9(6):491–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson RA, Kozlovsky AS (1985) Chromium intake, absorption and excretion of subjects consuming self-selected diets. Am J Clin Nutr 41:1177–1183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Athavale P, Shum KW, Chen Y, Agius R, Cherry N, Gawkrodger DJ (2007) Occupational dermatitis related to chromium and cobalt: experience of dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) in the U.K. over an 11-year period (1993–2004). Br J Dermatol 157:518–522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagchi D, Hassoun EA, Bagchi M, Stohs SJ (1995) Chromium-induced excretion of urinary lipid metabolites, DNA damage, nitric oxide production, and generation of reactive oxygen species in Sprague-Dawley rats. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 110:177–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Basketter DA, Angelini G, Ingber A, Kern PS, Menne T (2003) Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis 49:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bidstrup PL (1983) Effects of chrome compounds on the respiratory system. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 31–51Google Scholar
  8. Bock M, Schmidt A, Bruckner T, Diepgen TL (2004) Developments in chromate allergy in the German construction industry. Hautarzt 55:460–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boman A, Estlander T, Wahlberg JE (1972) Protective gloves for occupational use, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  10. Burrows D (1972) Prognosis in industrial dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 87:145–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burrows D (1978) Chromium and the skin. Br J Dermatol 99:587–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burrows D (1981) Chromium dermatitis in a tyre fitter. Contact Dermatitis 7:55–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Burrows D (1983) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Burrows D (1987) Comparison of 0.25 and 0.5% potassiumndichromate in patch testing. Bull Dermatol Allerg Professionale 2:117–120Google Scholar
  15. Burrows D, Adams RM (1990) In: Occupational skin disease, 2nd ed. (Adams RM, ed). W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 349–386.Google Scholar
  16. Burrows D, Calnan CD (1965) Cement dermatitis. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 51:27–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Burrows D, Cooke MD (1980) Trivalent chrome plating. Contact Dermatitis 6:222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Burrows D, Andersen KE, Camaras JG et al (1989) Trial of 0.5% versus 0.3750% potassium dichromate. Contact Dermatitis 21:351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Calnan CD (1978a) Chromate dermatitis from soluble oil. Contact Dermatitis 4:378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Calnan CD (1978b) Chromate in coolant water of gramophone record presses. Contact Dermatitis 4:246–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carøe C, Andersen K, Thyssen J, Mortz C (2010) Fluctuations in the prevalence of chromate allergy in Denmark and exposure to chrome-tanned leather. Contact Dermatitis 63(6):340–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chou TC, Chang HY, Chen CJ, Yu HS, Wu JD, Sheu SC, Shih TS (2008) Effect of hand dermatitis on the total body burden of chromium after ferrous sulfate application in cement among cement workers. Contact Dermatitis 59:151–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Clemmensen OJ, Jorgensen J, Jons O et al (1981) Exposure to chromium from hospital cleaning. Derm Beruf Umwelt 3:31–54Google Scholar
  24. Cohen SR, Davis DM, Kramkowski PE (1974) Clinical manifestations of chromic acid toxicity: nasal lesions in electroplate workers. Cutis 13:558–568Google Scholar
  25. Conde-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Villegas C et al (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 33:226–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Conner B (1972) Chromate dermatitis and paper manufacture. Contact Dermatitis Newsl 11:265Google Scholar
  27. Decaestecker AM, Marez T, Jdaini J et al (1990) Hypersensitivity to dichromate among asymptomatic workers in a chromate pigment factory. Contact Dermatitis 23:52–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dornan JD (1981) Occupational dermatoses amongst chrome platers in the Sheffield area 1977–80. Contact Dermatitis 7:354–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Einarsson O, Kylin B, Lindstedt G et al (1975) Chromium and cobalt in nickel in using cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 1:182–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. El Sayed F, Bazex J (1994) Air-borne contact dermatitis from chromate in cement with recall dermatitis on patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 30:58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellis V, Freeman S (1986) Dermatitis due to chromate in cement. Part 1. Chromate content in cement in Australia. Aust J Dermatol 27:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fernandez-Nieto M, Quirce S, Carnes J et al (2006) Occupational asthma due to chromium and nickel salts. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79(6):483–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fischer T, Rystedt I (1985) False-positive follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis 12:93–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman S (1995) Chromate allergy from ‘antifreeze-antiboil’. Australas J Dermatol 36:168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fregert S, Ovrum P (1963) Chromate in welding fumes with special reference to contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 43:119–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Heijer A (1972) Sensitization to chromium and cobalt in processing of sulfate pulp. Acta Derm Venereol 52:221–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Sandahl E (1979) Reduction of chromate in cement by iron sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 5:39–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Geier J, Lessmann H, Hellweg B, Jappe U, Spornraft-Ragaller P, Fuchs T et al (2009) Chromated metal products may be hazardous to patients with chromate allergy. Contact Dermatitis 60(4):199–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ghosh D, Bhattacharya B, Mukherjee B, Manna B, Sinha M, Chowdhury J, Chowdhury S (2002) Role of chromium supplementation in Indians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nutr Biochem 13:690–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Goh CL, Gan SL (1996) Changes in cement manufacturing process, a cause for decline in chromate allergy? Contact Dermatitis 34:51–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Goh CL, Gan SL, Ngui SJ (1986a) Occupational dermatitis in a prefabrication construction factory. Contact Dermatitis 15:235–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Goh CL, Wong PH, Kwok SF et al (1986b) Chromate allergy: total chromium and hexavalent chromium in the air. Derm Beruf Umwelt 34:132–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Halbert AR, Gebaver KA, Wall LM (1992) Prognosis of occupational chromate dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 27:214–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Handley J, Burrows D (1994) Dermatitis from hexavalent chromate in the accelerator of an epoxy sealant (PT 1422) used in the aircraft industry. Contact Dermatitis 30:193–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hansen MB, Rydin S, Menne T, Duus Johansen J (2002) Quantitative aspects of contact allergy to chromium and exposure to chrome-tanned leather. Contact Dermatitis 47:127–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hansen M, Menne T, Johansen J (2006) Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in leather and elicitation of eczema. Contact Dermatitis 54(5):278–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hedberg Y, Lidén C, Odnevall WI (2015) Chromium released from leather – I: exposure conditions that govern the release of chromium(III) and chromium(VI). Contact Dermatitis 72(4):206–215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Hogan DJ, Dannaker W, Lal S et al (1990) An international survey of the prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands. Derm Beruf Umwelt 38:143–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Huang YL, Chen CY, Sheu JY, Chuang IC, Pan JH, Lin TH (1999) Lipid peroxidation in workers exposed to hexavalent chromium. J Toxicol Environ Health A 56:235–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Huriez C, Martin P, Lefebvre M (1975) Sensitivity dichromate in a milk analysis laboratory. Contact Dermatitis 1:247–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ingber A, Gammelgaard B, David M (1998) Detergents and bleaches are sources of chromium contact dermatitis in Israel. Contact Dermatitis 38:101–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Joensen HD, Thormann J, Jespersen NP et al (1979) Kromallergi medicinsice og sociale aspekter. Ugeskr Laeger 141:1405–1407Google Scholar
  53. Kanerva L (1997) Dermatotoxicological aspects of metallic chromium. Eur J Dermatol 7:79–84Google Scholar
  54. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Savela A (2000) Incidence rates of occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by metals. Am J Contact Dermat 11:155–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kasprzak KS (1995) Possible role of oxidative damage in metal-induced carcinogenesis. Cancer Investig 13:411–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kleefstra N, Houweling ST, Bakker SJ, Verhoeven S, Gans RO, Meyboom-de Jong B, Bilo HJ (2007) Chromium treatment has no effect in patients with type 2 diabetes in a Western population: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care 30:1092–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Krook G, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1977) Chromate and cobalt eczema due to magnetic tapes. Contact Dermatitis 3:60–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Krupashankar DS, Manjushree D, Rathna MS (2009) Absence of chromates in detergents in India confirmed by diphenyl carbazide spot test. Dermatitis 20:351–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kumpulainen JT, Wolf WR, Veillon C, Mertz W (1979) Determination of chromium in selected United States diets. J Agric Food Chem 27:490–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kuo HW, Wu ML (2002) Effects of chromic acid exposure on immunological parameters among electroplating workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75(3):186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Langard S (1983) The carcinogenicity of chrome compounds in man and animals. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 13–31Google Scholar
  62. Lee HS, Goh CL (1988) Occupational dermatitis among chrome platers. Contact Dermatitis 18:89–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Liden C, Skare L, Nise G, Vahter M (2008) Deposition of nickel, chromium, and cobalt on the skin in some occupations – assessment by acid wipe sampling. Contact Dermatitis 58:347–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lindemann M, Rietschel F, Zabel M, Grosse-Wilde H (2008) Detection of chromium allergy by cellular in vitro methods. Clin Exp Allergy 38(9):1468–1475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Love G (1983) Chromium – biological and analytical considerations. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  66. Manciet JR, Barrade A, Janssen F, Morel P (1995) Contact allergy with immediate and delayed photoaggravation to chromate and cobalt. Contact Dermatitis 33:282–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mathias CGT (1982) Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis from contact allergy to a toilet soap containing chromium. Contact Dermatitis 8:29–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Mignini F, Streccioni V, Baldo M, Vitali M, Indraccolo U, Bernacchia G, Cocchioni M (2004) Individual susceptibility to hexavalent chromium of workers of shoe, hide, and leather industries. Immunological pattern of HLA-B8, DR3-positive subjects. Prev Med 39:767–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Moretto A (2015) Hexavalent and trivalent chromium in leather: what should be done? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73(2):681–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Nethercott JR (1982) Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada. Contact Dermatitis 8:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Nethercott J, Paustenbach D, Adams R, Fowler J, Marks J, Morton C, Taylor J, Horowitz S, Finley B (1994) A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment. Occup Environ Med 51:371–380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Nethercott J, Fowler J, Kauffman L et al (1996) Human response to repetitive hexavalent chromium challenge at 25 flg/ml in water. Jadassohn Centenary Congress, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Nguyen SH, Dang TP, Macpherson C, Maibach H, Maibach HI (2008) Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multi-centre population in North America (NACDG). Contact Dermatitis 58(2):101–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Niklasson B, Bjorkner B et al (1996) In vivo evaluation of an active barrier cream in nickel contact allergy. Jadassohn Centenary Congress, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Oleffe J, Roosels D, Vanderkell J et al (1971) Presence due chrome dans I-environment de travail. Derm Beruf Umwelt 19:57Google Scholar
  76. Pedersen NB (1977) Chromate in a food laboratory. Contact Dermatitis 3:105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Peltonen L, Fraki J (1983) Prevalence of dichromate sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 9:190–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Pirila V, Kilpi O (1954) On occupational dermatoses in Finland: a report of 1752 cases. Acta Derm Venereol 34:395–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Polak L (1983) Immunology of chromium. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 51–136Google Scholar
  80. Rogers S, Burrows D (1975) Contact dermatitis in milk testers. Contact Dermatitis 1:387–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Romaguera C, Grimalt F, Vilaplana J, Carreras E (1985) Formulation of a barrier cream against chromate. Contact Dermatitis 13:49–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Rudolf E, Cervinka M, Cerman J, Schroterova L (2005) Hexavalent chromium disrupts the actin cytoskeleton and induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in human dermal fibroblasts. Toxicol In Vitro 19:713–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Rycroft UG, Calnan CD (1977) Relapse of chromate dermatitis from sheet metal. Contact Dermatitis 3:177–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Schleiff P (1968) Provokation des Chromatekzems zu Testwecken durch interne Chrornzufubr. Hautarzt 19:209–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Shelley WB (1964) Chromium in welding fumes as cause of eczematous hand eruption. JAMA 189:772–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Snyder CA, Udasin I, Waterman SJ et al (1996) Reduced IL-6 levels among individuals in Hudson County, New Jersey, an area contaminated with chromium. Arch Environ Health 51:26–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Stern A, Yu C, Black K, Lin L, Lioy P, Gochfeld M, Fan Z (2010) Hexavalent chromium in house dust – a comparison between an area with historic contamination from chromate production and background locations. Sci Total Environ 408(21):4993–4998CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Stocks S, Mcnamee R, Turner S, Carder M, Agius R (2012) Has European Union legislation to reduce exposure to chromate in cement been effective in reducing the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis attributed to chromate in the UK? Occup Environ Med 69(2):150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Tandon R, Aarts B (1993) Chromium, nickel and cobalt contents of some Australian cements. Contact Dermatitis 28:201–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Thyssen JP, Jensen P, Carlsen BC, Engkilde K, Menne T, Johansen JD (2009) The prevalence of chromium allergy in Denmark is currently increasing as a result of leather exposure. Br J Dermatol 161:1288–1293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Valsecchi R, Cainelia T (1984) Chromium dermatitis and ascorbic acid. Contact Dermatitis 10:252–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G (1994) Chromate-allergic patients challenged orally with potassium dichromate. Contact Dermatitis 31:137–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wahlberg JE, Wennersten G (1977) Light sensitivity and chromium dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 97:411–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wall LM (1982) Chromate dermatitis and sodium dithionite. Contact Dermatitis 8:291–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Walsh EN (1953) Chromate hazards in industry. J Am Med Assoc 153:1305–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang ZQ, Qin J, Martin J, Zhang XH, Sereda O, Anderson RA, Pinsonat P, Cefalu WT (2007) Phenotype of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus may determine clinical response to chromium supplementation. Metabolism 56:1652–1655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Williams N (1997) Occupational skin ulceration in chrome platers. Occup Med (Lond) 47:309–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Williams N (1998) Nasal septal ulceration and perforation in jiggers. Occup Med (Lond) 48:135–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhang GS, Jin YL (2006) Studies on the nephrotoxicity of chromium compounds. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 35:659–662PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Louisiana State University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations