Advertisement

Laboratory Technicians

  • Marwa Hakimi
  • Riitta Jolanki
  • Howard I. Maibach
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Laboratory workers run a high risk of occupational dermatitis.

Laboratory technicians are exposed to a great number of chemicals, all of which are considered dangerous to the skin.

Many of the commonly used chemicals are corrosive or irritating to the skin, and some are allergenic.

Sensitization often develops to well-known allergens and also to rare and even to new sensitizers.

Human and animal tissue specimens, and laboratory animals, present additional risks of contact urticaria and skin infections.

Assessing skin exposure in research laboratories is exceptionally difficult because a large number of chemicals and even unknown intermediates may be present.

Contact allergy from accidental exposure to a chemical is often the first clue that the chemical is a potential contact sensitizer.

The use of protective gloves during laboratory work is essential, but disposable gloves are usually only suitable for short-term or occasional handling of chemicals.

Keywords

Occupational dermatology Laboratroy workers Dermatitis Contact allergy Contact urticaria Occupational dermatoses Contact irritants 

References

  1. Bassi N, Beck MH, Fawcett RL (2008) Allergic contact dermatitis from 4-chloro-2-[methylthio]pyrimidine-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester and methyl 4-hydroxy-2-hexynoate in a laboratory chemist. Contact Dermatitis 58:115–116. ISSN 1600-0536. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18186753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu S, Adisesh A (2013) Management of occupational hazards in healthcare: exposure to diphencyprone. BMJ Case Report.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-008321Google Scholar
  3. Boman A, Estlander T, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) (2005) Protective gloves for occupational use, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–335Google Scholar
  4. Botella-Estrada R, Mora E, de la Cuadra J (1992) Hexanediol diacrylate sensitization after accidental occupational exposure. Contact Dermatitis 26:50–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boukhman MP, Maibach HI (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis from tropicamide ophthalmic solution. Contact Dermatitis 41:47–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourrain JL, Morin C, Béani JC et al (1998) Airborne contact dermatitis from cacodylic acid. Contact Dermatitis 38:364–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burden AD, O’Driscoll JB, Page FC et al (1994) Contact hypersensitivity to a new isothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis 30:179–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrows D, Irvine J (1982) Contact dermatitis to hexylresorcinol. Contact Dermatitis 8:71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Byun JY, Woo JY, Choi YW et al (2013) Occupational airborne contact dermatitis caused by trifluoroacetic acid in an organic chemistry laboratory. Contact Dermatitis 70:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calnan CD, Hill RN (1979) Allergy to diphenyloxazole. Contact Dermatitis 5:269–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Camarasa JG, Barnadas M (1982) Occupational dermatosis by vitamin K3 sodium bisulphite. Contact Dermatitis 8:268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Groot AC (2008) Patch testing. Test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals, 3rd edn. Acdegroot Publishing, WapserveenGoogle Scholar
  13. De Veylder H, Dooms-Goossens A, Dupre K et al (1986) Airborne dermatitis due to 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propane diamine. Contact Dermatitis 15:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duman Y, Yakupogullari Y, Otlu B et al (2016) Laboratory-acquired skin infection in a clinical microbiologist: is wearing only gloves really safe? Am J Infection Control 22:935–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. English JS, Rycroft RJ (1988) Allergic contact dermatitis from methyl heptine and methyl octine carbonates. Contact Dermatitis 18:174–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1997) Hydroxylammonium chloride as sensitizer in a water laboratory. Contact Dermatitis 36:161–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Estlander T, Kanerva L, Tupasela O et al (1998) Occupational contact urticaria and type I sensitization caused by gerbera. Contact Dermatitis 38:118–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox JG (1982) Outbreak of tropical rat mite dermatitis in laboratory personnel. Arch Dermatol 118:676–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goon AT-J, McFadden JP, McCann M et al (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from melphalan and chlorambucil: cross-sensitivity or cosensitization? Contact Dermatitis 47:309–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon PM, McLelland J (1998) Contact sensitivity to Ancamine 2280 (p-aminocyclohexylamine) following a change in work practice. Contact Dermatitis 38:54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Guimaraens D, Gonzales MA, Condé-Salazar L (1994) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from intermediate products in famotidine synthesis. Contact Dermatitis 31:259–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heine A, Schulz B (1985) Allergisches kontaktekzem durch alpha-naphthylsenfol bei einer chemielaborantin (in German). Dermatol Monatsschr 171:201–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoet PH, Brüske-Hohlfeld I, Salata OV (2004) Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks. J Nanobiotechnology 8:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen O (1981) Contact allergy to propylene oxide and isopropyl alcohol in a skin disinfectant swab. Contact Dermatitis 7:148–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jensen CD, Andersen KE (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from a paper mill slimicide containing 2-bromo-4′-hydroxyacetophenone. Am J Contact Dermat 14:41–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson WM (1981) Occupational factors in coccidioidomycosis. J Occup Med 23:367–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1999) Occupational dermatoses among laboratory assistants. Contact Dermatitis 40:166–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kanerva L, Alanko K, Estlander T et al (1997) Occupational allergic contact urticaria from chloramine-T solution. Contact Dermatitis 37:180–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanerva L, Alanko K, Jolanki R et al (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from potassium persulfate. Contact Dermatitis 40:116–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Karjalainen A, Mutanen P, Martikainen R et al (1997) Risk of occupational diseases by occupation (in Finnish). In: Karjalainen A, Toikkanen J (eds) Jauhoastmasta sementti-ihottumaan. Ammattitautivaara eri ammateissa v. 1987–91. Työterveyslaitos, Helsinki, pp 6–46Google Scholar
  31. Kirkup ME, Murphy J, Beck MH et al (2001) Occupational contact sensitization to 1,2-diaminocyclohexane. Contact Dermatitis 45:121–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Knegt-Junk C, Geursen-Reitsma L, van Joost T (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis from pyridine in Karl Fischer reagent. Contact Dermatitis 28:252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Krogsrud NE, Larsen AI (1997) Airborne irritant contact dermatitis from benzalkonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis 36:112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Le Coz CJ, Caussade P, Bottlaender A (1998) Occupational contact dermatitis from methyl-ter-pyridine in a chemistry laboratory technician. Contact Dermatitis 38:214–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindskov R (1982) Contact urticaria to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 8:333–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lübbe D (1993) Professionelle Dinitrochlorbenzol-Kontaktderm atitis. Ein Fälle in der Nitrieranlage eines Chemiewerkes. Dermatosen 41:19–24Google Scholar
  37. McAleer MA, Bourke B, Bourke J (2010) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to HBTU [(o-benzotriazole-10yl)-N, N, N′, N,-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate]. Contact Dermatitis 62:123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer J (1995) Tuberculosis cutis: Folge einer beruflichen Nadelstichverletzung. Dermatosen 43:279–280Google Scholar
  39. Mitchell JC, Maibach HI (1975) Allergic contact dermatitis from phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride: cross-sensitivity to some related haloalkylamine compounds. Contact Dermatitis 1:363–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mochizuki T, Watanabe S, Kawasaki M et al (2002) A Japanese case of tinea corporis caused by Arthroderma benhamiae. J Dermatol 29:221–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Molina L, Amado A, Mattei PL, Taylor JS (2009) Contact dermatitis from acrylics in a histology laboratory assistant. Dermatitis 20:E11–E12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Monk BE (1988) Contact urticaria to locusts. Br J Dermatol 118:707–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Driscoll JB, Marcus R, Beck MH (1989) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from triphenyl phosphite. Contact Dermatitis 20:392–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pedersen NB, Thormann J, Senning A (1980) Occupational contact allergy to bis-(4-chlorophenyl)-methyl chloride. Contact Dermatitis 6:56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Price SM, Shupack JL (1978) Allergic contact dermatitis due to N, N-dimethyl-para-phenylenediamine in bacteriology technicians. Cutis 21:330–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Recke A, Recke AL, Jappe U (2015) Periorbital contact dermatitis caused by octylisothiazolinone in a floor-cleaning agent. Contact Dermatitis 72:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF (2008) Fisher’s contact dermatitis, 6th edn. BC Dekker, Hamilton, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  48. Rudzki E, Rebandel P (1990) Dermatitis from methyl 2,3 epoxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propionate. Contact Dermatitis 23:382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rycroft RJ (1981) Allergic contact dermatitis from laboratory synthesis of 4-bromomethyl-6,8-dimethyl-2(1H)-quinolone. Contact Dermatitis 7:39–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Senff H, Kuhlwein A, Bothe C et al (1988) Allergic contact dermatitis from selenite. Contact Dermatitis 19:73–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Susitaival P, Hannuksela M (1997) Animal and animal products. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria symdrome. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 95–105Google Scholar
  52. Tobler M, Wüthrich B, Freiburghaus AU (1990) Contact dermatitis from acrylate and methacrylate compounds in Lowicryl embedding media for electron microscopy. Contact Dermatitis 23:96–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. van Ketel WG (1979) Contact dermatitis from propylene oxide. Contact Dermatitis 5:191–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Violante FS, Milani S, Malenchini G et al (2005) Chloracne due to o-dichlorobenzene in a laboratory worker. Contact Dermatitis 52:108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Waclawski ER, Aldridge R (1995) Occupational dermatitis from the baine and codeine. Contact Dermatitis 33:51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wakelin SH, McFadden JP, Leonard JN et al (1998) Allergic contact dermatitis from d-limonene in a laboratory technician. Contact Dermatitis 38:164–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang MT, Wenger K, Maibach HI (1997) Piperazine diacrylamide allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 37:300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Weiss RR, Mowan C (1998) Contact urticaria from xylene. Am J Contact Dermat 9:125–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Weller R, Ormerod A (1996) Water tester’s dermatitis due to a para-phenylenediamine derivative. Contact Dermatitis 34:138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P (1997) Occupational contact dermatitis due to pyritinol. Contact Dermatitis 37:91–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California – San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Control of Hypersensitivity DiseasesFinnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)HelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Alameda Health System – Highland HospitalOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations