Advertisement

Canalization: A Central but Controversial Concept in Evo-Devo

  • Paula N. Gonzalez
  • Jimena Barbeito-Andrés
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Canalization refers to, in a broader sense, the production of consistent phenotypic traits in the face of genetic and environmental variation. It is a key concept for evolutionary developmental biology because it is one of the properties of developmental systems that modulates the expression of phenotypic variation, influencing the potential for evolutionary change (i.e., evolvability). Although the relevance of canalization is widely accepted, many topics around this concept are still a matter of debate. In this chapter, we first summarize the views about canalization from developmental and genetic population biologists and then discuss the mechanisms, origin, and evolutionary role of canalization. Mechanisms proposed to explain how canalization is achieved range from single molecular factors to complex interactions in the developmental-genetic architecture. Contrasting views also characterize explanations about the origin of canalization, with positions that favor an adaptive origin derived from selective forces and others that consider canalization as an emergent product of developmental processes. Independently of its origin, the role of canalization in the evolution of phenotypic traits is also controversial. Since canalized traits reduce the range of phenotypic outputs, canalization could be expected to reduce evolvability. However, it has been proposed that canalization allows the accumulation of new cryptic mutations that are maintained within populations and can be expressed in certain evolutionary contexts. In sum, we provide an updated discussion on this elusive but key concept, attempting to review contrasting and complementary positions.

Keywords

Phenotypic robustness Developmental stability Phenotypic landscape Evolvability 

References

  1. de Visser JAGM, Hermisson J, Wagner GP et al (2003) Perspective: evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57:1959–1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Geiler-Samerotte KA, Zhu YO, Goulet BE et al (2016) Selection transforms the landscape of genetic variation interacting with Hsp90. PLoS Biol 14:e2000465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson G, Wagner G (2000) Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory? BioEssays 22:372–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Green RM, Fish JL, Young NM et al (2017) Developmental nonlinearity drives phenotypic robustness. Nat Commun 8:1970CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hansen TF (2011) Epigenetics: adaptation or contingency? In: Hallgrímsson B, Hall BK (eds) Epigenetics. Linking genotype and phenotype in development and evolution. University of California Press, California, pp 357–376Google Scholar
  6. Hendrikse JL, Parsons TE, Hallgrímsson B (2007) Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evol Dev 9:393–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hermisson J, Wagner GP (2004) The population genetic theory of hidden variation and genetic robustness. Genetics 168:2271–2284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Jamniczky H, Boughner JC, Rolian C et al (2010) Rediscovering Waddington in the post-genomic age: operationalising Waddington’s epigenetics reveals new ways to investigate the generation and modulation of phenotypic variation. BioEssays 32:553–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A et al (2013) Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu Rev Biochem 82:323–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Klingenberg CP, Graham JH (2015) Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry (Basel) 7:843–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masel J, Trotter MV (2010) Robustness and evolvability. Trends Genet 26:406–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Meiklejohn CD, Hartl DL (2002) A single mode of canalization. Trends Ecol Evol 17:468–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nijhout HF, Sadre-Marandi F, Best J, Reed MC (2017) Systems biology of phenotypic robustness and plasticity. Integr Comp Biol 57:171–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Palmer A (1994) Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In: Markow T (ed) Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications. Contemporary issues in genetics and evolution. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 335–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Queitsch C, Todd AS, Lindquist S (2002) Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417: 618–624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rutherford SL, Lindquist S (1998) Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396:336–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Salathia N, Queitsch C (2007) Molecular mechanisms of canalization: Hsp90 and beyond. J Biosci 32:457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sato K, Siomi H (2010) Is canalization more than just a beautiful idea? Genome Biol 11:109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Siegal ML, Bergman A (2002) Waddington’s canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10528–10532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Siegal ML, Leu J-Y (2014) On the nature and evolutionary impact of phenotypic robustness mechanisms. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:495–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Specchia V, Piacentini L, Tritto P et al (2010) Hsp90 prevents phenotypic variation by suppressing the mutagenic activity of transposons. Nature 463:662–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Waddington CH (1957) The strategies of the genes. Macmillan Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Wagner GP, Booth G, Bagheri-Chaichian H (1997) A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51:329–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Studies in Neurosciences and Complex Systems (ENyS – Unidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos) CONICET-UNAJ-HECFlorencio VarelaArgentina

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mihaela Pavličev
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations