Allograft Use in Modern Spinal Surgery
Allograft use continues to be important in modern spinal surgery due to its abundant supply, ability to customize to shape, and avoidance of donor site morbidity. However, surgeons must be aware of the limitations of the grafts when used in isolation and how to obtain bony healing. These limitations include subsidence from altered mechanical properties, a lack of osteoinduction and risk of immunogenicity. Optimal healing can be achieved through optimizing the host, selecting the correct graft for the bony environment where the healing is required, and optimizing local graft site biology and stability. Tissue engineering in arthrodesis through obtaining a stable mechanical construct, use of an appropriate structural allograft, and placement of a biologic component (e.g., BMP-2) has shown to be a reliable means to obtain union and achieved satisfactory outcomes. Novel biological agents show promise and will continue to mature in their clinical application.
KeywordsAllograft Bone banking Corticocancellous Femoral ring Demineralized bone matrix Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) Union Arthrodesis Outcomes
- Aryan HE et al (2008) Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex via C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pedicle screw fixation in a multicenter clinical experience in 102 patients: modification of the Harms and Goel techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 8(3):222–229. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coric D et al (2018) Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc. J Neurosurg Spine 28(3):252–261. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.SPINE16824. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
- Peppers TA et al (2017) Prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of an allogeneic bone matrix containing stem cells (Trinity Evolution® Viable Cellular Bone Matrix) in patients undergoing two-level anterior cervicaldiscectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0564-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Price CT et al (2003) Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(8):793–798Google Scholar
- Rahn BA (2002) Bone healing: histologic and physiologic concepts. In: Fackelman GE (ed) Bone in clinical orthopedics. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 287–326Google Scholar