Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks

Living Edition
| Editors: Xuemin (Sherman) Shen, Xiaodong Lin, Kuan Zhang

Equalization Techniques for Single-Carrier Modulations

  • Michael RiceEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32903-1_180-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Linear modulations use pulses to transmit data over a channel. Transmission through a nonideal channel (say, from multipath propagation) causes temporal spreading of the pulses. The temporal spreading of the pulses produces a phenomenon known as inter-symbol interference: the detection instant for a given symbol contains contributions from adjacent symbols. Equalization refers to the category of signal processing techniques designed to mitigate inter-symbol interference.

Introduction

Linear, single-carrier modulations are described by the complex-valued, low-pass equivalent pulse train (Proakis 2008).
$$ {s}_c(t)=\sum \limits_{k=0}^{K-1}{a}_k{p}_c\left(t-{kT}_s\right) $$
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Austin M (1967) Decision feedback equalization for digital communication over dispersive channels. Technical report no. 437. MIT Lincoln Laboratory, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Benveniste A, Goursat M (1984) Blind equalizers. IEEE Trans Commun 32(8):871–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Forney GD (1972) Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 8(3):363–378MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Godard D (1980) Self-recovering equalization and carrier tracking in two-dimensional data communication systems. IEEE Trans Commun 28(11):1867–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayes M (1996) Statistical digital signal processing and modeling. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. Haykin S (2013) Adaptive filter theory, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucky R (1965) Automatic equalization for digital communication. Bell Syst Tech J 44(4):547–588MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Proakis J (2008) Digital Communications, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Treichler J, Fijalkow I, Johnson C (1996) Fractionally spaced equalizers: how long should they really be? IEEE Signal Process Mag 13(3):65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ungerboeck G (1974) Adaptive maximum-likelihood receiver for carrier-modulated data-transmission systems. IEEE Trans Commun 22(5):624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Walzman T, Schwartz M (1973) Automatic equalization using the discrete frequency domain. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 19(1):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Widrow B (1966) Adaptive filters I: fundamentals. Technical report no. 6764-6. Stanford Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, StanfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical & Computer EngineeringBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Yingying Chen

There are no affiliations available