Skip to main content

Synonyms

Dependency power; Fragmented bureaucracy; High costs; Leveling bureaucratic inertia; Resistance to change; Uncertainty

Definition

Leveling bureaucratic inertia occurs at the individual, group, organization, and interorganizational level. In this leveling bureaucratic inertia, organizations perpetuate the establishment of the path dependence rules and procedures, regardless of whether they are counterproductive or potentially specifically inverse built-up hierarchical objectives. In all these levels, bureaucratic inertia occurs when bureaucracy resistance to change, wherein individuals have no willingness to learn and the ability to make any organizational improvement. History, culture, and tradition are among the factors, which influenced bureaucratic inertia not only at the individual level, but also at the level of organizational networks. Bureaucratic inertia causes high costs, dependency in power, and uncertainty, which ultimately leads to a fragmented bureaucracy.

Introduction...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler PS (1999) Building better bureaucracies. Academy of Management Executive 13(4):36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29(10):1649–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congleton R (1982) A model of asymmetric bureaucratic inertia and bias. Public Choice 39(3):421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs A (1967) Inside bureaucracy. Little, Brown and Company, 292 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feiock RC (2013) The institutional collective action framework. Policy Stud J 41(3):397–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazley B (2014) Intersectoral collaboration and the motivation to collaborate. In: Big ideas in collaborative public management. Routledge, pp 46–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe TM (2012) Delegation, control and the study of public bureaucracy. The Forum 10(2):1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1984) Transaction costs, institutions, and economic history. J Inst Theor Econ 140:7–17

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2008) Developing a method for analyzing institutional change. In Sandra SB, Nicholas M (eds) In alternative institutional structures: evolution and impact. Routledge, New York, pp 48–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares AF, Feiock RC (2014) Intermunicipal cooperation and regional governance in Europe: an institutional collective action framework. European Consortium for Political Research in Glasgow, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38(3):595–613. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2565421. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zantvoort B (2015) On inertia: resistance to change in individuals, institutions and the development of knowledge. Cosmos Hist: J Nat Soc Philos 11(1):342–361

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dyah Mutiarin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mutiarin, D., Nurmandi, A., Moner, Y. (2018). Red Tape and Bureaucracy. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_659-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_659-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics